Advertisement

On Modelling of Refractory Castables by Marked Gibbs and Gibbsian-like Processes

  • Felix Ballani
Part of the Lecture Notes in Statistics book series (LNS, volume 185)

Summary

The modelling of self-flowing refractory castables, a special kind of concrete, is discussed. It consists of two phases: a system of randomly distributed spherical hard grains and a cement matrix. The focus is on marked Gibbs and Gibbsian-like processes but also some other models are discussed. It turns out that a particular canonical marked Gibbsian-like process is useful for modelling the samples and more plausible than the classical stationary marked Gibbs process.

Key words

Canonical Gibbsian-like process Marked Gibbs point processes Randomshift model Refractory castables 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    A.J. Baddeley and J. Møller. Nearest-neighbour Markov point processes and random sets. International Statistical Review, 57:89–121, 1989.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    A.J. Baddeley and R. Turner. Practical maximum pseudolikelihood for spatial point patterns. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Statistics, 42:283–322, 2000.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    F. Ballani, D.J. Daley and D. Stoyan. Modelling the microstructure of concrete with spherical grains. To appear in Computational Materials Science, 2005.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    M. Bargieł and J. Moscinski. C language program for irregular packing of hard spheres. Computer Physics Communications, 64:183–192, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    D.P. Bentz, E.J. Garboczi and K.A. Snyder. A hard core/soft shell microstructural model for studying percolation and transport in three-dimensional composite media. Building and Fire Research Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland, http://ciks.cbt.nist.gov/~garbocz/hcss/useguide.html, 1999.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    G. Döge, K.R. Mecke, J. Møller, D. Stoyan and R.P. Waagepetersen. Grand canonical simulations of hard-disk systems by simulated tempering. International Journal of Modern Physics C, 15:129–147, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    G. Döge and D. Stoyan. Statistics for non-sparse homogeneous Gibbs point processes. In: K.R. Mecke, D. Stoyan (eds) Morphology of Condensed Matter. Physics and Geometry of Spatially Complex Systems. Lecture Notes in Physics, No. 600, 418–427, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2002.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    J.W. Evans. Random and cooperative sequential adsorption. Review of Modern Physics, 65:1281–1304, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    A. Frey and V. Schmidt. Marked point processes in the plane I — a survey with applications to spatial modelling of communication networks. Adv. Perf. Anal., 1:65–110, 1998.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    M. Goulard, A. Särkkä and P. Grabarnik. Parameter estimation for marked Gibbs processes through the maximum pseudolikeliood method. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 23:365–379, 1996.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    J. Hubálková and D. Stoyan. On a quantitative relationship between degree of inhomogeneity and cold crushing strength of refractory castables. Cement Concrete Research, 33:747–753, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    J.L. Jensen and J. Møller. Pseudolikelihood for exponential family models of spatial point processes. Annals of Applied Probability, 1:445–461, 1991.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    T. Kokkila, A. Mäkelä and E. Nikinmaa. A method for generating stand structures using Gibbs marked point process. Silva Fennica, 36:265–277, 2002.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    M.N.M. van Lieshout. Stochastic Geometry Models in Image Analysis and Spatial Statistics. CWI Tract, 108, Amsterdam, 1995.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    H. Löwen. Fun with hard spheres. In: K.R. Mecke, D. Stoyan, (eds) Statistical Physics and Spatial Statistics. The Art of Analyzing Spatial Structures and Pattern Formation. Lecture Notes in Physics, No. 554, 295–331, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2000.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    B.D. Lubachevsky and F.H. Stillinger. Geometric properties of random disk packings. Journal of Statistical Physics, 60:561–583, 1990.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    S. Mase. On the possible form of size distributions for Gibbsian processes of mutually non-intersecting discs. Journal of Applied Probability, 23:646–659, 1986.zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    S. Mase, J. Møller, D. Stoyan, R.P. Waagepetersen and G. Döge. Packing densities and simulated tempering for hard-core Gibbs point processes. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 53:661–680, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    N. Metropolis, A.W. Rosenbluth, M.N. Rosenbluth, H. Teller and E. Teller. Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. Journal of Chemical Physics, 21:1087–1092, 1953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    J. Møller and R.P. Waagepetersen. Statistical Inference and Simulation for Spatial Point Processes. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, 2003.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    P. Sollich. Predicting phase equilibria in polydisperse systems. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 14:79–117, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    D. Stoyan. Statistical inference for a Gibbs point process of mutually non-intersecting discs. Biometrical Journal, 51:153–161, 1989.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    D. Stoyan. Random systems of hard particles: models and statistics. Chinese Journal of Stereology and Image Analysis, 7:1–14, 2002.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    D. Stoyan, W.S. Kendall and J. Mecke. Stochastic Geometry and its Applications. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1995.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    D. Stoyan and M. Schlather. Random sequential adsorption: Relationship to dead leaves and characterization of variability. Journal of Statistical Physics, 100:969–979, 2000.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    D. Stoyan and H. Stoyan. Fractals, Random Shapes and Point Fields. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1994.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    S. Torquato. Random Heterogeneous Materials: Microstructures and Macroscopic Properties. Springer, New York, 2002.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    N.B. Wilding and P. Sollich. Grand canonical ensemble simulation studies of polydisperse fluids. Journal of Chemical Physics, 116:7116–7126, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    G. Winkler. Image Analysis, Random Fields and Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods. Springer, Berlin, 2003.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    D.N. Winslow, M.D. Cohen, D.P. Bentz, K.A. Snyder and E.J. Garboczi. Percolation and pore structure in mortars and concrete. Cement Concrete Research, 24:25–37, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Felix Ballani
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für StochastikTechnische Universität Bergakademie FreibergFreibergGermany

Personalised recommendations