Skip to main content

Evidence-Based Approach to Oncology

  • Chapter
Oncology

Abstract

In the early years of the 21st century, clinicians and medical researchers often use the term evidence-based medicine. Cancer prevention, screening, diagnosis, and therapy, we hear, must be based on the best evidence to provide the best care. But is this approach new? And if it is, what have we been doing until now? In this chapter, we hope to provide perspectives on this question, by examining what evidence-based medicine (EBM)—oncology, in particular—is and is not, and by looking at the history of clinical inquiry, up to and including current research. We also hope to provide readers with a theoretical framework that will be useful in placing the results of new research into the context of existing knowledge, with the ultimate goal of improving clinical practice.

The opinions expressed in this manuscript are those of the authors and do not represent official opinions or positions of the National Institutes of Health, the Department of Health and Human Services, or the federal government.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Evidence-based medicine: a new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA 1992;268:2420–2425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sackett D, Straus SE, Richardson WS, et al. Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach Evidence-Based Medicine. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingston, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Morabia A. P.C.A. Louis and the birth of clinical epidemiology. J Clin Epidemiol 1996:49:1327–1333.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dunn PM. James Lind (1716–94) of Edinburgh and the treatment of scurvy. Arch Dis Childhood 1997;76:F64–F65.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Keith JM. Florence Nightingale: statistician and consultant epidemiologist. Int Nurs Rev 1988;35:147–150.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gehan E. The role of the biostatistician in cancer research. Biomed Pharmacother 2001;55:502–509.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mainland D. The rise of experimental statistics and the problems of a medical statistician. Yale J Biol Med 1954;27:1–10.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Meldrum ML. A brief history of the randomized clinical trial: from oranges and lemons to the gold standard. In: Allegra CJ, Kramer BS (eds). Hematology/Oncology Clinics of North America: Understanding Clinical Trials. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fisher B, Bauer M, Margolese R, et al. Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and segmental mastectomy with or without radiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1985;312:665–673.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, http://www.cebm.utoronto.ca/practise/formulate/.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Albanes D, Heinonen OP, Taylor PR et al. α-Tocopherol and β-carotene supplements and lung cancer incidence in the Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention Study: effects of base-line characteristics and study compliance. J Natl Cancer Inst 1996;88:1560–1570.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Krieger N, Wolff MS, Hiatt RA, et al. Breast cancer and serum organochlorines: a prospective study among white, black, and Asian women. J Natl Cancer Inst 1994;86(8):589–599.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fisher B. Clinical trials for the evaluation of cancer therapy. Cancer (Phila) 1984;54:2609–2617.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Roussouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL et al. Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results from the Women’s Health Initiative randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2002;288:321–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dans AL, Dans LF, Guyatt GH, et al. Users’ guides to the medical literature: XIV. How to decide on the applicability of clinical trial results to your patient. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 1998;279:545–549.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. McAlister FA, Straus SE, Guyatt GH et al. Users’ guides to the medical literature. XX. Integrating research evidence with the care of the individual patient. JAMA 2000;283:2829–2836.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Feuer EJ, Frey CM, Brawley OW, et al. After a treatment breakthrough: a comparison of trial and population-based data for advanced testicular cancer. J Clin Oncol 1994;12:368–377.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Nattinger AB, Hoffmann RG, Howell-Pelz A, et al.. Effect of Nancy Reagan’s mastectomy on choice of surgery for breast cancer by U.S. women. JAMA 1998;279:762–766.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Weir HK, Thun MJ, Hankey BF, et al. Annual report to the Nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2000, featuring the uses of surveillance data for cancer prevention and control. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003;95:1276–1299.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Welch HG, Schwartz SM, Woloshin S. Are increasing 5-year survival rates evidence of success against cancer? JAMA 2000;283:2975–2978.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

DeVoto, E., Kramer, B.S. (2006). Evidence-Based Approach to Oncology. In: Chang, A.E., et al. Oncology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-31056-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-31056-8_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-24291-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-31056-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics