Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Health Informatics ((HI))

Summary

Computer simulation can be used to evaluate complex information systems in situations where traditional methodologies are difficult or too costly to employ. The modeling process is described followed by three examples where computer simulation has been utilized in planning for a wide-area healthcare network and in the use of a hospital information system to reduce costs and errors in order entry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J.G. Anderson and C.E. Aydin, Overview: Theoretical perspectives and methodologies for the evaluation of healthcare information systems, in: J.G. Anderson, C.E. Aydin, S.J. Jay, editors, Evaluating Healthcare Information Systems: Methods and Applications (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1994), pp. 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J.G. Anderson and C.E. Aydin, Technology assessment of healthcare information systems, Int. J. Technol. Assessment Health Care 13 (1997) 380–393.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. J.R. Moehr, Evaluation: Salvation or nemesis of medical informatics? Comput. Biol. Med. 32 (2002) 113–125.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. G. Gordon, System Simulation (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cli1s, NJ, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  5. J.J. Swain, Simulation goes mainstream, 1997 simulation software survey, ORMS Today 24(5) (1997) 35–46.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Banks and J.S. Carson, Discrete-Event System Simulation (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  7. B. Hannon and M. Ruth, Dynamic Modeling (Springer, New York, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  8. J.L. Hargrove, Dynamic Modeling in the Health Sciences (Springer, New York, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  9. A.M. Law and W.D. Kelton, Simulation Modeling and Analysis, 2nd ed. (McGraw Hill, New York, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  10. N. Oreskes, K. Schrader-Frechette, and K. Belitz, Verification, validation and confirmation of numerical models in the Earth sciences, Science 2163 (1994) 641–646.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Katzper, Epistemological bases of postulational modeling, in: J.G. Anderson, M. Katzper, editors, Health Sciences, Physiological and Pharmacological Simulation Studies (Society for Computer Simulation, San Diego, CA, 1995), pp. 83–88.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Bahensky, University’s statewide network links rural doctors, Healthcare Inf. 9(3) (1992) 10–12.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. K. Norman and J.J. Moynihan, The impact of EDI & ANSI standards on administrative cost containment, Healthcare Inf. 9(11) (1992) 90–96.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. J. Villasante,Telematic systems for health in Europe: A look towards the future, Health Inf. Eur. 1(2) (1993) 10–12.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J.G. McDaniel, Discrete-event simulation of a wide-area healthcare network, J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2(4) (1995) 220–237.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. D.F. Sittig and W.W. Stead, Computer-based physician order entry: The state of the art, J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 1(2) (1994) 108–123.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. J.G. Anderson, Clearing the way for physicians’ use of clinical information systems, Communications of the ACM 40(8) (1997) 83–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. J.G. Anderson, S.J. Jay, S.J. Clevenger, D.R. Kassing, J. Perry, and M. Anderson, Physician utilization of a hospital information system: A computer simulation model, in: Proceedings of the 12th Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care (1988), pp. 858–861.

    Google Scholar 

  19. D.W. Bates, D.J. Cullen, N. Laird, et al., Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events, J. Am. Med. Assoc. 274 (1995) 29–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. L.L. Leape, D.W. Bates, D.J. Cullen, et al., Systems analysis of adverse drug events, J. Am. Med. Assoc. 274 (1995) 35–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. D.C. Classen, S.L. Pestotnik, R.S. Evans, J.F. Lloyd, and J.P. Burke, Adverse drug events in hospitalized patients: Excess length of stay, extra costs, and attributable mortality, J. Am. Med. Assoc. 277 (1997) 301–306.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. J.G. Anderson, S.J. Jay, M. Anderson, and T.J. Hunt, Evaluating the potential effectiveness of using computerized information systems to prevent adverse drug events, in: Proceedings of the 1997 AMIA Annual Fall Symposium (1997), pp. 228–232.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Anderson, J.G. (2005). Evaluation in Health Informatics: Computer Simulation. In: Anderson, J.G., Aydin, C.E. (eds) Evaluating the Organizational Impact of Healthcare Information Systems. Health Informatics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-30329-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-30329-4_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-24558-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-30329-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics