6. Concluding Remarks
For technical convenience, in numerical implementations of all methods presented above set Λ is usually transformed to the following form \( \bar \Lambda = \{ \lambda \in \mathcal{R}^k |\lambda _i > 0,i = 1,...,k,\Sigma _{i = 1}^k \lambda _i = 1\}\). This is achieved by dividing each component of λ by the sum of all components of that λ, for all λ ∈ Λ. There is an obvious one-to-one correspondence between Λ and \( \bar \Lambda\).
It is astonishing but fortunately true that the multitude of interactive MCDM methods fall just to one of three classes which correspond to three types of characterizations presented in Chapter 3. This not only allows simple presenting and smooth “marketing” the field of MCDM to potential users, but has some methodological and technical consequences for the way interactive MCDM methods can be implemented and applied in practice. In particular, the general outline of interactive MCDM methods given in this chapter is sufficient for presenting in Chapter 6 the Generic Decision Supporting Scheme.
Interactive MCDM methods are “soft” in the sense that they deny rigorous formal convergence considerations. The rationale behind this type of methods is an assumption, strongly supported by evidence from practical applications (real, not academic), that there is noway to encapsulate DM preferences into a formal, consistent, and verifiable framework. If so, the convergence issues are to be left to experimental investigations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
7. Annotated References
Armann R., (1989), Solving multiobjective programming problems by discrete representation. Optimization, 20, 483–492.
Benayoun R., de Montgolfier J., Laritchev O., (1971), Linear programming with multiple objective functions: Step Method (STEM). Mathematical Programming, 1, 366–375.
Buchanan J.T., (1997), A naïve approach for solving MCDM problems: the GUES method. Journal of Operational Research Society, 48, 202–206.
Chankong V., Haimes Y.Y., (1978), The interactive surrogate worth trade-off (ISWT) method for muliobjective decision-making. In: Multiple Criteria Problem Solving, (Zionts S., ed.), Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, 155, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 42–67.
Chankong V., Haimes Y.Y., (1983), Multiobjective Decision Making Theory and Methodology. Elsevier Science Publishing Co., New York.
Dell R.F., Karwan M.H., (1990), An interactive MCDM weight space reduction method utilizing a Tchebycheff utility function. Naval Research Logistics, 37, 263–277.
Edwards W., (ed.), (1992), Utility Theories: Measurements and Applications. Kluwer, Boston.
Fishburn P.C., (1986), Utility Theory for Decision Making. JohnWiley & Sons, New York.
Gal T., Stewart Th., Hanne Th., (eds.), (1999), Multicriteria Decision Making-Advances in MCDM: Models, Algorithms, Theory and Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Geoffrion A.M., Dyer J.S., Feinberg A., (1972), An interactive approach to muliti-criterion optimization with an application to the operation of an academic department. Management Science, 19, 357–368.
Haimes Y.Y., Lasdon L.S., Wismer D.A., (1971), On bicriterion formulation of the problems of integrated system identification and system optimization. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 1, 296–297.
Jaszkiewicz A., Słowiński R., (1994), The light-beam search over a nondominated surface of a multiple-objective problem. In: Multiple Criteria Decision Making — Proceedings of Tenth International Conference: Expand and Enrich the Domains of Thinking and Application, (Thzeng G.H., Wand H.F., Wen U.P., Yu P.L, eds.), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 87–99.
Jaszkiewicz A., Słowiński R., (1995), The light-beam search-outranking based interactive procedure for multiple-objective mathematical programming. In: Advances in Multicriteria Analysis (Pardalos P.M., Siskos Y., Zopoundis C., eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 129–146.
Kaliszewski I., Zionts S., (2004), Generalization of the Zionts-Wallenius multicriteria decision making algorithm. Control & Cybernetics, 3, 477–500.
Korhonen P., Laakso J., (1984), A visual interactive method for solving the multiple-criteria problem. In: Interactive Decision Analysis, (Grauer M., Wierzbicki A.P., eds.), Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, 229, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 146–153.
Korhonen P., Laakso J., (1985), On developing a visual interactive multiple criteria method — an outline. In: Decision Making with Multiple Objectives, (Haimes Y.Y., Chankong V., eds.), Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, 242, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 272–281.
Korhonen P., Laakso J., (1986), A visual interactive method for solving the multiple criteria problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 24, 227–287.
Korhonen P., (1988), A visual reference direction approach to solving discrete multiple criteria problems. European Journal of Operations Research, 34, 152–159.
Michalowski W., (1988), Use of the displaced worst compromise in interactive multiobjective programming. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 18, 472–477.
Michalowski W., Szapiro T., (1989), A procedure for worst outcomes displacement in multiple criteria decision making. Computers and Operations Research, 16, 195–206.
Michalowski W., Szapiro T., (1992), A bi-reference procedure for interactive multiple criteria programming. Operations Research, 40, 247–258.
Miettinen K.M., (1999), Nonlinear multiobjective optimization. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
Miettinen K.M., Mäkelä M.M., (1995), Interactive bundle-based method for nondifferentiable multiobjective optimization: NIMBUS. Optimization, 34, 231–246.
Miettinen K.,M., Mäkelä M.M., (1997), Interactive method NIMBUS for non-differentiable multiobjective optimization problems. In: Multicriteria Analysis (Clímaco J., ed.), Springer-Verlag, 310–319.
Nakayama H., Nomura J., Sawada K., Nakajima R., (1986), An application of satisficing trade-off method to a blending problem of industrial materials. In: Large-Scale Modelling and Interactive Decision Analysis (Fandel G., Grauer M., Kurzhanski A., Wierzbicki A.P., eds.), Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, 273, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 303–313.
Nakayama H., (1989), Sensitivity and trade-off analysis in multiple objective programming. In: Methodology and Software for Interactive Decision Support, (Lewandowski A., Stanchev I., eds.), Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, 337, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 86–93.
Nakayama H., (1995), Aspiration level approach to interactive multi-objective programming and its applications. In: Advances in Multicriteria Analysis (Pardalos P.M., Siskos Y., Zopoundis C., eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 147–174.
Nakayama H., Furukawa K., (1985), Satisficing trade-off method with an application to multiobjective structural design. Large Scale Systems, 8, 47–57.
Nakayama H., Sawaragi Y., (1984), Satisfacing trade-off method for multiobjective programming. In: Interactive Decision Analysis (Grauer M., Wierzbicki A.P., eds.), Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, 229, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 113–122.
Narula S.C., Kirilov L., Vassilev V., (1994a), An interactive algorithm for solving multiple objective nonlinear programming problems. In: Multiple Criteria Decision Making-Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference: Expand and Enrich the Domains of Thinking and Application (Thzeng G.H., Wand H.F., Wen U.P., Yu P.L., eds.), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 119–127.
Narula S.C., Kirilov L., Vassilev V., (1994b), Reference direction approach for solving multiple objective nonlinear programming problems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 24, 804–806.
Roy A., Wallenius J., (1991), Nonlinear and unconstrained multiple-objective optimization: algorithm, computation, and application. Naval Research Logistics, 38, 623–635.
Sakawa M., (1982), Interactive mulitiobjective decision making by the Sequental Proxy Optimization Technique: SPOT. European Journal of Operational Research, 9, 386–396.
Steuer R.E. (1986), Multiple Criteria Optimization: Theory, Computation and Application. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Steuer R.E., Choo E.U., (1983), An interactive weighted Tchebycheff procedure for multiple objective programming. Mathematical Programming, 26, 326–344.
Wierzbicki A.P., (1980), The use of reference objectives in multiobjective optimization. In: Multiple Criteria Decision Making; Theory and Applications, (Fandel G., Gal T., eds.), Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, 177, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 468–486.
Wierzbicki A.P., (1986), On the completeness and constructiveness of parametric characterizations to vector optimization problems. OR Spectrum, 8, 73–87.
Wierzbicki A.P., (1990), Multiple criteria solutions in noncooperative game theory, Part III: Theoretical Foundations. Discussion Paper 288, Kyoto Institute of Economic Research, Kyoto University, Kyoto.
Wierzbicki A.P., (1999), Reference point approaches. In: Multicriteria Decision Making-Advances in MCDM: Models, Algorithms, Theory and Applications (Gal T., Stewart Th., Hanne Th., eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Zeleny M., (1976), The theory of displaced ideal. In: Multiple Criteria Decision Making Kyoto 1975, (Zeleny M., ed.), Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, 123, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 153–206.
Zeleny M., (1982), Multiple Criteria Decision Making. McGraw-Hill, Inc.
Zionts S., Wallenius J., (1976), An interactive programming method for solving the multiple criteria problem. Management Science, 22, 652–663.
Zionts S., Walenius J., (1983), An interactive multiple objective linear programming method for a class of underlying nonlinear value functions. Management Science, 29, 519–529.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2006). MCDM Interactive Methods - An Overview. In: Soft Computing For Complex Multiple Criteria Decision Making. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 85. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-30177-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-30177-1_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-30243-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-30177-8
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)