Skip to main content

Should Poverty and Inequality Measures be Combined?

  • Chapter
Poverty, Inequality and Development

Part of the book series: Economic Studies in Inequality, Social Exclusion and Well-Being ((EIAP,volume 1))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Atkinson, Anthony B., “On the Measurement of Poverty,” Econometrica, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourguignon, François and Gary S. Fields, “Discontinuous Losses from Poverty, Generalized Pα Measures, and Optimal Transfers to the Poor,” Journal of Public Economics, January, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty, Achin, Prasanta K. Pattanaik, and Yongsheng Xu, “On the Structure of Some Measures of Deprivation,” Working Paper, July, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fields, Gary S., “A Welfare Economic Approach to Growth and Distribution in the Dual Economy,” Ouarterly Journal of Economics, August, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fields, Gary S., Distribution and Development: A New Look at the Developing World. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press and the Russell Sage Foundation, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fields, Gary S. and John C.H. Fei, “On Inequality Comparisons,” Econometrica, March, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, James, “Poverty Indices,” Chapter 3 in this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, James, Joel Greer, and Erik Thorbecke, “A Class of Decomposable Poverty Measures,” Econometrica, May, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, James and Amartya K. Sen, “On Economic Inequality After a Quarter Century,” in Amartya K. Sen, On Economic Inequality, Expanded Edition. (New York: Oxford, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadar, Josef and William Russell, “Rules for Ordering Uncertain Prospects,” American Economic Review, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, Stephen and Peter Lambert, “Three I’s of Poverty Curves, with an Analysis of UK Poverty Trends,” Oxford Economic Papers, July, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion, Martin, Poverty Comparisons. (Chur, Switzerland: Harwood Academic Publishers, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Saposnik, R., “Rank Dominance in Income Distributions,” Public Choice, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya K., “Poverty: An Ordinal Approach to Measurement,” Econometrica, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorrocks, Anthony F., “Ranking Income Distributions,” Economica, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorrocks, Anthony F., “Deprivation Profiles and Deprivation Indices,” in Stephen P. Jenkins, Arie Kapteyn, and Bernard M.S. van Praag, eds., The Distribution of Welfare and Household Production. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fields, G.S. (2006). Should Poverty and Inequality Measures be Combined?. In: de Janvry, A., Kanbur, R. (eds) Poverty, Inequality and Development. Economic Studies in Inequality, Social Exclusion and Well-Being, vol 1. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-29748-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics