Skip to main content

Fluence Map Optimization in IMRT Cancer Treatment Planning and A Geometric Approach

  • Chapter
Multiscale Optimization Methods and Applications

Part of the book series: Nonconvex Optimization and Its Applications ((NOIA,volume 82))

Summary

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is a state-of-the-art technique for administering radiation to cancer patients. The goal of a treatment is to deliver a prescribed amount of radiation to the tumor, while limiting the amount absorbed by the surrounding healthy and critical organs. Planning an IMRT treatment requires determining fluence maps, each consisting of hundreds or more beamlet intensities. Since it is difficult or impossible to deliver a sufficient dose to a tumor without irradiating nearby critical organs, radiation oncologists have developed guidelines to allow tradeoffs by introducing so-called dose-volume constraints (DVCs), which specify a given percentage of volume for each critical organ that can be sacrificed if necessary. Such constraints, however, are of combinatorial nature and pose significant challenges to the fluence map optimization problem.

The purpose of this paper is two-fold. We try to introduce the IMRT fluence map optimization problem to a broad optimization audience, with the hope of attracting more interests in this promising application area. We also propose a geometric approach to the fluence map optimization problem. Contrary to the traditional view, we treat dose distributions as primary independent variables and beamlet intensities as secondary. We present theoretical and preliminary computational results for the proposed approach, while omitting excessive technical details to maintain an expository nature of the paper.

This author’s work was supported in part by DOE/LANL Contract 03891-99-23 and NSF Grant No. DMS-0240058.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. G. K. Bahr, J. G. Kereiakes, H. Horwitz, R. Finney, J. Galvin, and K. Goode. “The method of linear programming applied to radiation treatment planning.” Radiology, 91:686–693, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  2. H. Bauschke and J. Borwein. “On the Convergence of von Neumann’s Alternating Projection Algorithm for Two Sets,” Set-Valued Analysis, 1: pp. 185–212 (1993).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Brahme. “Optimized radiation therapy based on radiobiological objectives,” Sem. in Rad. Oncol., Vol. 9, No. 1: pp. 35–47, (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Y. Censor. “Mathematical optimization for the inverse problem of intensity modulated radiation therapy.” In: J.R. Palta and T.R. Mackie (Editors), Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy: The State of The Art. American Association of Physicists in Medicine, Medical Physics Monograph No. 29, Medical Physics Publishing, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, 2003, pp. 25–49.

    Google Scholar 

  5. W. Cheney and A. Goldstein. “Proximity maps for convex sets.” Proceedings of the AMS, Vol. 10: pp. 448–450 (1959).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Cho PS, Lee S, Marks RJ II, Oh S, Sutlief SG and Phillips MH. “Optimization of intensity modulated beams with volume constraints using two methods: cost function minimization and projections onto convex sets”. Medical Physics 25:435–443, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. C. Cotrutz, M. Lahanas, C. Kappas, and D. Baltas. “A multiobjective gradient-based dose optimization algorithm for external beam conformal radiotherapy,” Phys. Med. Biol. 46: pp. 2161–2175 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Holder. “Designing Radiotherapy Plans with Elastic Constraints and Interior Point Methods,” 2003, Health Care and Management Science, vol. 6, num. 1, pages 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. R. Jeraj, C. Wu and T. R Mackie. “Optimizer convergence and local minima errors and their clinical importance.” Phys. Med. Biol. 48 (2003) 28092827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Lahanas, M. Schreibmann, and D. Baltas. “Multiobjective inverse planning for intensity modulated radiotherapy with constraint-free gradient-based optimization algorithms,” Phys. Med. Biol., 48(17): pp. 2843–71 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. R. G. Lane, S. M. Morrill, I. I. Rosen, and J. A. Wong. “Dose volume considerations with linear programming optimization.” Med. Phys., 18(6):1201–1210, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. E. W. Larsen. “Tutorial: The Nature of Transport Calculations Used in Radiation Oncology,” Transport Theory Statist. Phys., 26: pp. 739 (1997).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. E. Lee, T. Fox, and I. Crocker. “Integer Programming Applied to Intensity-Modulated Radiation Treatment Planning Optimization,” Annals of Operations Research, Optimization in Medicine, 119: pp. 165–181 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. J. Llacer, J. Deasy, T. Bortfeld, T. Solberg and C. Promberger. “Absence of multiple local minima effects in intensity modulated optimization with dose-volume constraints.” Phys. Med. Biol. 48 (2003) 183210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. M. Merritt, Y. Zhang, Helen Liu, Xiaodong Zhang, Xiaochun Wang, Lei Dong, Radhe Mohan. “A successive linear programming approach to the IMRT fluence map optimization problem.” Manuscript, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. Merritt and Y. Zhang. “An Interior-Point Gradient Method for Large-Scale Totally Nonnegative Least Squares Problems.” To appear in JOTA, Vol. 126, No. 1 (2005), pp. 191–202.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. R. Palta and T. R. Mackie, eds. “Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy: The State of the Art,” Medical Physics Publishing, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  18. R. Rardin, M. Langer, F. Preciado-Walters, V. Thai. “A coupled column generation, mixed integer approaches to optimal planning of intensity-modulated Radiation therapy for cancer.” To appear in Mathematical Programming, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  19. H. Romeijn, R. Ahuja, J. Dempsey, A. Kumar and J. Li. “A novel linear programming approach to fluence map optimization for intensity modulated radiation therapy treatment planning,” Phys. Med. Biol., Vol. 48: pp. 3521–3542 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. D. Shepard, M. Ferris, G. Olivera, and T. Mackie. “Optimizing the delivery of radiation therapy to cancer patients,” SIAM Review, 41: pp. 721–744 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. S. V. Spirou and C. Chui. “A gradient inverse planning algorithm with dose-volume constraints,” Med. Phys., 25(3): pp. 321–333 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. J. von Neumann. “The geometry of orthogonal spaces, Functional operators-vol. 11.” Annals of Math. Studies, no. 22, Princeton University Press, 1950. (This is a reprint of mimeographed lecture notes, first distributed in 1933.)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Q. Wu and R. Mohan. “Algorithms and functionality of an intensity modulated radiotherapy optimization system,” Med. Phys., 27(4): pp. 701–711 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. C. Wu, R. Jeraj, W. Lu and T. Mackie. “Fast treatment plan modification with an over-relaxed Cimmino algorithm.” Med. Phys. 31:191–200 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Q. Wu and R. Mohan. “Multiple local minima in IMRT optimization based on dose-volume criteria.” Med. Phys. 29 (2002) 151427.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Q. Wu, D. Djajaputra, M. Lauterbach, Y. Wu, and R. Mohan. “A fast dose calculation method based on table lookup for IMRT optimization,” Phys. Med. Biol., 48(12): pp. N159–N166 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Y. Xiao, D. Michalski, Y. Censor and J. Galvin. “Inherent smoothness of intensity patterns for intensity modulated radiation therapy generated by simultaneous projection algorithms.” Phys. Med. Biol. 49 (2004) 3227–3245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. L. Xing, J. G. Li, S. Donaldson, Q. T. Le, and A. L. Boyer. “Optimization of importance factors in inverse planning,” Phys. Med. Biol., 44(10): pp. 2525–2536 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zhang, Y., Merritt, M. (2006). Fluence Map Optimization in IMRT Cancer Treatment Planning and A Geometric Approach. In: Hager, W.W., Huang, SJ., Pardalos, P.M., Prokopyev, O.A. (eds) Multiscale Optimization Methods and Applications. Nonconvex Optimization and Its Applications, vol 82. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-29550-X_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics