Skip to main content
  • 722 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. The emphasis on the importance of analytical means is not intended to convey a perception that numerous other aspects are not involved in preventing good policy. My experience in the policymaking arena precludes such naivete. Experiences have made me painfully aware, for example, of the tremendous power and influence of entrenched corporate interests in the policy process. That experience has also made me aware that one of the strongest weapons against such interests is well publicized results from competent research. For an example of the power of research and advocacy with regard to reducing the power of the atomic energy industry in Washington, D.C. see: Duffy, Robert J. Nuclear Politics in America: A History and Theory of Government Regulations. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson, Frederick R., Robert L. Glicksman, Daniel R. Mandelker, and A. Dan Tarlock. Environmental Protection: Law and Policy. New York: Aspen Law and Business, 1999, p. xxvii.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ibid., p. xxviii.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Menand, Louis. The Metaphysical Club. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lodge, George C. The New American Ideology. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1976, p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Menand. Op. cit., p. 441.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Westbrook, Robert B. John Dewey and American Democracy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1991, pp. 408–409.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lippmann, Walter. The Good Society. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bellah, Robert N., Richard Madsen, William M. Sullivan, Ann Swidler, and Steven M. Tipton. The Good Society. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Daly, Herman E. and John B. Cobb, Jr. For the Common Good. Boston: Beacon Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dewey, John. The Public and Its Problems. New York: Henry Holt and Company, 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Polanyi, Karl. The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon Press, 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  13. De Greene, Keynon B. Sociotechnical Systems. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lodge. Op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tool, Marc R. The Discretionary Economy: A Normative Theory of Political Economy. Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear Publishing Company, Inc., 1979.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2006). Introduction. In: Policymaking for A Good Society: The Social Fabric Matrix Approach to Policy Analysis and Program Evaluation. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-29370-1_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics