Skip to main content

The Chinese Conception of the Self

Towards a Person-Making Perspective

  • Chapter
Indigenous and Cultural Psychology

Part of the book series: International and Cultural Psychology ((ICUP))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allport, G. W. (1955). Becoming: Basic considerations for a psychology of personality. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, S.M., & Chen, Serena (2002). The relational self: An interpersonal social-cognitive theory. Psychological Review, 109, 619–645.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bodde, D. (1953). Harmony and conflict in Chinese philosophy. In A.F. Wright (Ed.), Studies in Chinese thought (pp. 19–75). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. M. (1998). Self-regulation and the addictive behaviors. In W. R. Miller & N. Heather (Eds.), Treating addictive behaviors (2nd ed., pp. 61–73). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1990). Principles of Self-regulation: Action and emotion. In R.M. Sorrentino & E.T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (Vol. 2, pp. 3–52). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, W. T. (1963). A source book in Chinese philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, T. S. (1989). Confucian ethics and order-complex: A sociological interpretation of Chinese thoughts. Teipei: Ju Liou. (In Chinese.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, T. S., King, A. Y. C., Chan, H. M., Chan, K. M., Yang, C. F., and Chiu, C. Y. (2001). Zhong-yung rationality: Beyond instrumental, value, and communicative rationality. A manuscript submitted for publication. (In Chinese.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, K. (2000). Between Western dualism and Chinese Erh-chi (dual-element): Comparisons on categorization and thinking style. A paper presented at the First Conference on “Social Sciences Concepts: Indigenous and Western”, Taipei, Taiwan, April 1–2. (In Chinese.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Creel, H. G. (1987). The role of compromise in Chinese culture. In C. Le Blanc, C. & S. Blader (Eds.), Chinese ideas about nature and society. Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, R. C. (1991). The relational self: Theoretical convergences in psychoanalysis and social psychology. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Bary, W. T. (1991). Learning for one’s: Essays on the individual in Neo-Confucian thought. New York: Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding, Z. Y., & Wu, J. D. (1993). Changes in ideas and thinking style during the Spring-Autumn and the Warring-States Periods. Changsha: Hunan Publishing Co. (In Chinese.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckenberger, L. H. (1995). Activity or action: Two different roads towards an integration of culture into psychology? Culture and Psychology, 1, 67–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckenberger, L. H. (2001). Action Theory: Psychological. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 45–49). Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. A. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, Zheng (2001). The unearthed Guo Dan bamboo book and Si-Mencius School of Confucianism. Cultural China, 8, 36–43. (In Chinese.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1984). From the native’s point of view: On the nature of anthrological understanding. In R. S. Shweder & R. A. LeVine (Eds.), Cultural theory: Essays on mind, self, and emotion (pp. 123–136). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hori, B. I. (1986). A study on the Even-Land Policy (Chinese Translation Version). Taipei, Taiwan: Hung Wen Guan. (In Chinese.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, C. H. & Jen, W. (1991). “Great man” (Chun-tsu) and “small man” (hsiao-ren) in the Confucian Analects: A transformation approach. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27, 425–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jahoda, G. (1992). Crossroads between Culture and Mind: Continuities and change in Theories of Human Nature. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiao, G. C. (1991). Thoughts on self-other relationship in ancient China. Beijing: People’s University Press. (In Chinese.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Leary, M. R. (1995). Self-presentation: Impression management and interpersonal behavior. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y. Y., Yang, K. S., & Wen, C. I. (1985). A collection of papers on modernization and indigenization. Taipei: Gui Guan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S. H. (2000). The openness of Confucianism. Global Dialogue, Winter Issue, 89–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logue, A. W. (1995). Self-control: Waiting until tomorrow for what you want today. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng, P. Y (1993). The subjectivistic thinking in Chinese philosophy. Beijing: Orient Publishing Co. (In Chinese.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng, P. Y. & Kuang, B. L. (1993). The thinking style of traditional Chinese philosophies. Hang Zhou: Zhejiang People’s Publishing Co. (In Chinese.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W. R., & Brown, J. M. (1991). Self-regulation as a conceptual basis for the prevention and treatment of addictive behaviors. In N. Heather & W. R. Miller & J. Greeley (Eds.), Self-control and the addictive behaviors (pp. 3–79). Sydney, Australia: Maxwell Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246–268.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mizoguchi, Y. (1994). Acomparison of the Chinese and Japanese conceptions of gong and si. Twenty-one Century Bi-monthly, February Issue, 85–97. (Chinese translation.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pervin, L. A., & Lewis, M. (1978). Perspectives in interactional psychology. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pye, L.W. (1968). The spirit of Chinese politics: The psychocultural study of the authority crisis in political development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedikides, C., & Strube, M. (1995). The multiply motivated self. Personal and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1330–1335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suls, J. & Mullen, B. (1982). From the cradle to the grave: Comparison and self-evaluation across the life-span. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psycyological perspectives of the self (Vol. 1, pp. 97–128). Hillside, NJ: LEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tu, W. M. (1994). Embodying the universe: A note on Confucian self-realization. In R. T. Ames, W. Dissanayake, & T. P. Kasulis (Eds.), Self as person in Asian theory and practice (pp. 177–186). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, A. (2000). Cosmology and political culture in early China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, F. Y. (2002). The self in ancient Chinese mind: A cultural psychological interpretation. An unpublished manuscript. (In Chinese.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J. V. (1989). Theory and research concerning social comparison of personal attributes. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 231–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, C. F. (1991a). Introduction. In H.S.R. Kao and C. F. Yang (Eds.), The Chinese mind and the Chinese heart: Papers on indigenous Chinese psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 9–60). Taipei: Yuan-Liou. (In Chinese.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, C. F. (1991b). A theory on the Chinese self. In C. F. Yang and H.S.R. Kao (Eds.), The Chinese mind and the Chinese heart: Papers on indigenous Chinese psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 19–93). Taipei: Yuan-Liou. (In Chinese.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, C. F. (1991c). A critical review of self and self-related research in Taiwan and Hong Kong. In C. F. Yang and H.S.R. Kao (Eds.), The Chinese mind and the Chinese heart: Papers on indigenous Chinese psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 93–145). Taipei: Yuan-Liou. (In Chinese.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, C. F. (1993). Toward a framework for the study of Chinese personality. In K.S. Yang & A.B. Yu (Eds.), The mind and behavior of the Chinese (pp. 319–441). Taipei: Guei-Guan. (In Chinese.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, C. F. (1996). How to study the Chinese. Taipei: Gui Guan. (In Chinese.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, C. F. (2000a). Psychocultural foundations of informal groups: The issues of loyalty, sincerity, and trust. In L. Dittmer, H. Fukui, & P.N.S. Lee (Eds.), Informal Politics in East Asia (pp. 225–244). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, C. F. (2000b). A conceptualization of the Chinese interpersonal emotion, qing. Paper presented at The XVth Congress of the International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology (IACCP), July 16–22, Pultusk, Poland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, C. F. (2001). Toward a new conceptualization of guanxi and renqing. In C. F. Yang (Ed.), Chinese interpersonal relationship, affection, and trust: A interactional perspective (pp. 337–370). Taipei: Yuan Liou. (In Chinese.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, C. F. & Chiu, C.Y. (1997). A preliminary study of zhong-yong. Paper presented at the Fourth Symposium on “The Psychology and Behavior of the Chinese”, May 29–31, Taipei, Taiwan. (In Chinese.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, R. B. (2000). Self and I and public opinion. Paper presented at the First Conference on “Social Sciences Concepts: Indigenous and Western”, Taipei, Taiwan, April 1–2. (In Chinese.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, R. B., & Huang, C. C. (1996). The ancient Chinese thinking style: An exploration. Taipei: Cheng Chung Publishing Co. (In Chinese.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Y. S. (1976). The imperial power and the prime minister’s power under “juen zuen chan bei”. In Y. S. Yu (Ed.), History and thoughts (pp. 47–76). Taipei, Taiwan: Lien Jing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Y. S. (1993). Between the self and the group. Ming Bao Monthly, August Issue, 106–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, D. N. (1989a). Studies on Chinese Thoughts on Ethics. Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Publisher. (In Chinese.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, D. N. (1989b). The scope of classic Chinese philosophical concepts. Beijing: Academy of Chinese Social Sciences Press. (In Chinese.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L. W. (1989). The logical structure of Chinese philosophy. Beijing: Academy of Chinese Social Sciences Press. (In Chinese.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Y. L. (1991). Confucian model personality and Chinese culture. Shanyang, PRC: Liouning Educational Books. (In Chinese.)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chung-Fang, Y. (2006). The Chinese Conception of the Self. In: Kim, U., Yang, KS., Hwang, KK. (eds) Indigenous and Cultural Psychology. International and Cultural Psychology. Springer, Boston, MA . https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28662-4_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics