Skip to main content

Equilibrium Analysis for a Network Market Model

  • Chapter
Robust Optimization-Directed Design

Part of the book series: Nonconvex Optimization and Its Applications ((NOIA,volume 81))

Summary

In this paper we model and analyze a market equilibrium structure working on a network. The model is motivated by competition in electricity power generation markets, where consumers and producers are located in different nodes connected by power transmission lines. We analyze two different equilibrium concepts, namely, the Walrasian and the noncooperative Nash outcomes. By using concepts coming from Variational Analysis and Game Theory, we prove that both equilibria exist. Our existence proofs rely on fixed point theorems and epiconvergence stable approximations.

This work was partially supported by ICM Complex Engineering Systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arrow, K.J., G. Debreu. 1954. Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy. Econometrica, 22, 265–290.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Aumann, R.J. 1965. Integrals of set-valued functions. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Aplications, 12, 1–12.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Balder, E. 2001. 2001. On equilibria for discontinuous games: Nash approximation schemes. Preprint.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Balder, E. 2004. An equilibrium existence result for games with incomplete information and indeterminate outcomes. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 40:297–320.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Billingsley, P (1968): Convergence of Probability Measures. New York, Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Day, C., B. Hobbs, J.-S. Pang. 2002. Oligopolistic competition in power markets: A conjectured supply function approach. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 17:597–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Escobar, J.F., A. Jofré. 2004. Electricity wholesale markets: An oligopoly-network framework. Submitted to Review of Economic Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Escobar, J.F., A. Jofré. 2005. A Variational convergence approach for equilibrium analysis on network markets. Mimeo

    Google Scholar 

  9. Escobar, J.F., A. Jofré, R. Palma. 2005. A bid-based pool power market model: Theory and computation. Mimeo

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fudenberg D., and J. Tirole (1991): Game Theory. Cambridge, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Green, R.J., D. Newbery. 1992. Competition in the British electricity spot market. Journal of Political Economy, 100:929–953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hobbs, B.F., C.B. Metzler, J.-S. Pang. 2000. Strategic gaming analysis for electric power networks: An MPEC approach. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 15:638–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. IEEE PES Tutorial. 1999. Game Theory Applications in Electric Power Markets. IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jofré, A., R.T. Rockafellar, R.J-B Wets. 2005. A variational inequality scheme for determining economic equilibrium Variational Analysis and Applications. F. Giannessi, A. Maugeri, eds. Kluwer, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Klemperer P., M. Meyer. 1989. Supply function equilibria in oligopoly under uncertainty. Econometrica, 57:1243–1277.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Motto, A., F. Galiana, A. Conejo, M. Haneault. 2003. On Walrasian equilibrium for pool-based electricity markets. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 17:774–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nagurney, A. 1999. Network Economics: A Variational Inequality Approach. Kluwer, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pang, J.-S., B. Hobbs. 2002. Spatial oligopolistic equilibria with arbitrage, shared resources, and price functions conjectures. To appear Mathematical Programming.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rockafellar, R.T., R.J-B Wets. 1998. Variational Analysis. Springer, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Schweppe, F., M. Caramanis, R. Tabors, R. Bohn. 1988. Spot Pricing of Electricity. Kluwer, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wei, J.-Y., Y. Smeers. 1999. Spatial oligopolistic models with Cournot firms and regulated transmission prices. Operations Research, 47:102–112.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Escobar, J.F., Jofré, A. (2006). Equilibrium Analysis for a Network Market Model. In: Kurdila, A.J., Pardalos, P.M., Zabarankin, M. (eds) Robust Optimization-Directed Design. Nonconvex Optimization and Its Applications, vol 81. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28654-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics