Skip to main content

Potential Sociological and Political Barriers to Medical Emergency Team Implementation

  • Chapter
Medical Emergency Teams

Abstract

Implementing a MET response system in a hospital will likely alter the culture of care and threaten the status quo. There are many potential psychological, emotional, sociological, and economic barriers to bringing a new system of care to a stable environment. Nevertheless, strong data indicate that such a system of care will decrease unexpected mortality in a variety of hospital settings. Therefore, the key question with which hospital leadership must grapple is how to implement the system, not whether to implement it. There is no strong data to define the particular barriers, nor how to overcome them. Instead, in this chapter we have proposed strategies that have been effective in our hospital environments and may benefit others as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Lee A, Bishop G, Hillman KM, Daffurn K. The medical emergency team. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1995;23:183–186.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bristow PJ, Hillman KM, Chey T, et al. Rates of in-hospital arrests, deaths, and intensive care admissions: the effect of a medical emergency team. Med J Aust. 2000;173:236–240.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Buist MD, Moore GE, Bernard SA, Waxman BP, Anderson JN, Nguyen TV. Effects of a medical emergency team on reduction of incidence of and mortality from unexpected cardiac arrests in hospital: preliminary study. BMJ. 2002;324: 387–390.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bellomo R, Goldsmith D. Postoperative serious adverse events in a teaching hospital: a prospective study. Med J Aust. 2002;176:216–218.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nathens AB, Jurkovich GJ, Cummings P, Rivara FP, Maier RV. The effect of organized systems of trauma care on motor vehicle crash mortality. JAMA. 2000;283:1990–1994.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lecky F, Woodford M, Yates DW; the UK Trauma Audit Research Network. Trends in trauma care in England and Wales 1989–97. Lancet. 2000;355:1771–1775.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mullins RJ, Veum-Stone J, Helfand M, Zimmer-Gembeck M, Trunkey D. Outcome of hospitalized patients after institution of a trauma system in an urban area. JAMA. 1994;27:1919–1924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Plsek PE, Greenhalgh T. The challenge of complexity in health care. BMJ. 2001;323:625–628.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Eccles FR, Grimshaw J. Why does primary care need more implementation research? Fam Pract. 2001;18:353–355.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dellinger RP. Fundamental critical care support: another merit badge or more? Crit Care Med. 1996;24:556–557.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cook RI, Render M, Woods DD. Gaps in the continuity of care and progress on patient safety. BMJ. 2000;320:791–794.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Schneider EC, Lieberman T. Publicly disclosed information about the quality of health care: response of the US public. Qual Saf Health Care. 2001;10:96–103.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Beyea SC. Implications of the 2004 National Patient Safety Goals. AORN J. 2003;78:834–836.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Griffith JR, Knutzen SR, Alexander JA. Structural versus outcomes measures in hospitals: a comparison of joint commission and medicare outcomes scores in hospitals. Qual Manag Health Care. 2002;10:29–38.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Landis NT. Government finds fault with hospital quality review by joint commission and states. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1999;56:1699–1700.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Scanlon M. Computer physician order entry and the real world: we’re only humans. Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2004;30:342–346.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pugliese G. In search of safety: an interview with Gina Pugliese. Interview by Alison P. Smith. Nurs Econ. 2002;20:6–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cors WK. Physician executives must leap with the frog. Accountability for safety and quality ultimately lie with the doctors in charge. Physician Exec. 2001;27:14–16.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Foraida M, DeVita M, Braithwaite RS, Stuart S, Brooks MM, Simmons RL. Improving the utilization of medical crisis teams (Condition C) at an urban tertiary care hospital. J Crit Care. 2003;18:87–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hourihan F, Bishop G, Hillman KM, Daffurn K, Lee A. The medical emergency team: a new strategy to identify and intervene in high-risk patients. Clin Intensive Care. 1995;6:269–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee KH, Angus DC, Abramson NS. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation: what cost to cheat death? Crit Care Med. 1996;24:2046–2052.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. McQuillan P, Pilkington S, Alan A, et al. Confidential inquiry into quality of care before admission to intensive care. BMJ. 1998;316:1853–1858.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Goldhill DR, White SA, Sumner A. Physiological values and procedures in the 24 hours before ICU admission from the ward. Anaesthesia. 1999;54:529–534.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Reason J. Combating omission errors through task analysis and good reminders. Qual Saf Health Care. 2002;11:40–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hillman K, Alexandrou E, Flabouris M, et al. Clinical outcome indicators in acute hospital medicine. Clin Intensive Care. 2000;11:89–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

DeVita, M.A., Hillman, K. (2006). Potential Sociological and Political Barriers to Medical Emergency Team Implementation. In: DeVita, M.A., Hillman, K., Bellomo, R. (eds) Medical Emergency Teams. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-27921-0_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-27921-0_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-27920-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-27921-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics