Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Gutschalk, A., Patterson, R.D., Rupp, A., Uppenkamp, S. and Scherg, M. (2002) Sustained magnetic fields reveal separate sites for sound level and temporal regularity in human auditory cortex. NeuroImage 15, 207–16.
Imada, T., Watanabe, M., Mashiko, T., Kawakatsu, M. and Kotani, M. (1997) The silent period between sounds has a stronger effect than the interstimulus interval on auditory evoked magnetic fields. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 102, 37–45.
Krumbholz, K., Patterson, R.D. and Pressnitzer, D. (2000) The lower limit of pitch as determined by rate discrimination. J Acoust Soc Am 108, 1170–80.
Krumbholz, K., Patterson, R.D., Seither-Preisler, A., Lammertmann, C. and Lütkenhöner, B. (2003) Neuromagnetic evidence for a pitch processing centre in Heschl’s gyrus. Cereb Cortex (in press).
Lütkenhöner, B., Lammertmann, C. and Knecht, S. (2001a) Latency of auditory evoked field deflection N100m ruled by pitch or spectrum? Audiol Neurootol 6, 263–78.
Lütkenhöner, B., Lammertmann, C., Ross, B. and Steinsträter, O. (2001b) Tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex revisited: high precision neuromagnetic studies. In: Breebaart, D.J., Houtsma, A.J.M., Kohlrausch, A., Prijs, V.F., Schoonhoven, R. (Eds.), Physiological and Psychophysical bases of auditory function. Shaker, Maastricht, pp. 129–136.
Lütkenhöner, B. (2003) Single-dipole analyses of the N100m are not suitable for characterizing the cortical representation of pitch. Audiol Neurootol (in press).
Lütkenhöner, B., Krumbholz, K., Lammertmann, C., Seither-Preisler, A., Steinsträter, O. and Patterson, R.D. (2003) Localization of primary auditory cortex in humans by magnetoencephalography. NeuroImage 18, 58–66.
Pressnitzer, D., Patterson, R.D. and Krumbholz, K. (2001) The lower limit of melodic pitch. J Acoust Soc Am 109, 2074–84.
Roberts, T.P. and Poeppel, D. (1996) Latency of auditory evoked M100 as a function of tone frequency. NeuroReport 7, 1138–40.
Roberts, T.P.L., Ferrari, P., Stufflebeam, S.M. and Poeppel, D. (2000) Latency of the auditory evoked neuromagnetic field components: stimulus dependence and insights toward perception. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 17, 114–129.
Warren, R.M. and Bashford, J.A., Jr. (1981) Perception of acoustic iterance: pitch and infrapitch. Percept Psychophys 29, 395–402.
Lu, T., Liang, L. and Wang, X. (2001) Temporal and rate representations of time-varying signals in the auditory cortex of awake primates. Nat Neurosci. 4, 1131–1138.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lütkenhöner, B., Borgmann, C., Krumbholz, K., Seither, S., Seither-Preisler, A. (2005). Auditory processing at the lower limit of pitch studied by magnetoencephalography. In: Pressnitzer, D., de Cheveigné, A., McAdams, S., Collet, L. (eds) Auditory Signal Processing. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-27045-0_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-27045-0_19
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-21915-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-27045-6
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)