Skip to main content

Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons

  • Chapter
Nuclear Energy
  • 4361 Accesses

Abstract

Following World War II, during which the United States (aided by Britain) developed and used atomic bombs, other countries undertook their own nuclear-weapon programs. The first successful international agreement to control the spread of nuclear weapons came after President Dwight Eisenhower’s “Atoms for Peace” proposal, made in 1953, under which the United States would aid countries in their pursuit of peaceful applications of nuclear energy while withholding the technology needed for weapons.1 This proposal eventually led to the establishment of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in 1957, with the dual role of promoting peaceful nuclear uses and establishing safeguards, including inspections, to prevent this aid from being used to develop nuclear weapons. The IAEA submits reports to the United Nations but is not an agency of the United Nations. It receives financial support from its 136 member states. The members include virtually all countries with current or prospective nuclear activities, with exception of North Korea, which withdrew its IAEA membership in June 1994.2

Relatively recent summaries of efforts to control the spread of nuclear weapons are given by Richard Garwin and Georges Charpak in Megawatts and Megatons [1] and by Robert Mozley in The Politics and Technology of Nuclear Proliferation [2].

Current listings of IAEA membership are posted on the IAEA website at [http://www.iaea.org/worldatom/About/Profile/member.html].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Richard L. Garwin and Georges Charpak, Megawatts and Megatons: A Turning Point in the Nuclear Age? (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Robert F. Mozley, The Politics and Technology of Nuclear Proliferation (Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  3. National Academy of Sciences, Nuclear Arms Control: Background and Issues, Report of the Committee on International Security and Arms Control (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  4. William Epstein, “Indefinite Extension—with Increased Accountability,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 51, no. 4, 1995: 27–30.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tariq Rauf, “An Unequivocal Success? Implications of the NPT Review Conference,” Arms Control Today, 2000. [From: http://www.armscontrol.org/act/2000_07-08/raufjulaug.asp]

    Google Scholar 

  6. United Nations, 2000 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, Final Document, NPT/CONF.2000/28 (May 24, 2000). [From: http://www.ceip.org/files/projects/npp/resources/NPT2000FinalText.htm]

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eliot Marshall, “Did Test Ban Watchdog Fail to Bark?” Science 280, no. 5372, 1998: 2038–2040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Paul Kerr, “North Korea Quits NPT, Says It Will Restart Nuclear Facilities” (Arms Control Association, January/February 2003). [From: http://www.armscontrol.org/act/2003_01-02/nkorea_janfeb03.asp?print]

    Google Scholar 

  9. Peter D. Zimmerman, private communication, March 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Myron B. Kratzer, “‘Demythologizing Plutonium,” Global’ 93, Future Nuclear Systems: Emerging Fuel Cycles and Waste Disposal Options, Seattle, September, 1993 (unpublished paper).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Robert S. Norris and Hans M. Kristensen, “NRDC Nuclear Notebook: Global Nuclear Stockpiles, 1945–2002,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 58, no. 6, 2002: 103–104.

    Google Scholar 

  12. David Albright, Frans Berkhout, and William Walker, Plutonium and Highly Enriched Uranium 1996, World Inventories, Capabilities and Policies (New York: Oxford University Press, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  13. A.S. Krass, P. Boskma, B. Elzen, and W.A. Smit, Uranium Enrichment and Nuclear Weapon Proliferation, Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (London: Taylor & Francis, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Richard Rhodes, Dark Sun: The Making of the Hydrogen Bomb (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Andrei Sakharov, Memoirs (New York: Knopf, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  16. “Ukraine: Country Joins NPT in December Ceremony.” Nuclear News 38, no. 1, January 1995: 45–46.

    Google Scholar 

  17. William Sweet, The Nuclear Age: Atomic Power, Proliferation and the Arms Race, 2nd Edition (Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Inc., 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bertrand Goldschmidt, The Atomic Complex: A Worldwide Political History of Nuclear Energy, translated by Bruce M. Adkins (La Grange Park, IL: American Nuclear Society, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  19. John Wilson Lewis and Xue Litai, China Builds the Bomb (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  20. “World List of Nuclear Power Plants,” Nuclear News 46, no. 3, March 2003: 41–67.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Leonard S. Spector, Nuclear Proliferation Today (New York: Vintage Books, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Embassy of India, Washington, DC, Evolution of India’s Nuclear Policy, May 27, 1998. [From: http://www.indianembassy.org/pic/nuclearpolicy.htm]

    Google Scholar 

  23. David Albright, India’s and Pakistan’s Fissile Material and Nuclear Weapons Inventories, End of 1999, Institute for Science and International Security, October 11, 2000. [From: http://www.isis-online.org/publications/southasia/stocks1000.html]

    Google Scholar 

  24. Leonard S. Spector and Jacqueline R. Smith, Nuclear Ambitions; The Spread of Nuclear Weapons 1989–1990 (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Federation of Atomic Scientists, Pakistan Nuclear Weapons, May 27, 2000. [From: http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/pakistan/nuke/]

    Google Scholar 

  26. Center for International Security and Cooperation (Stanford University) and Center for Global Security Research (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory), Verifying the Agreed Framework, Michael May, General Editor, Report UCRLID-142036 and CGSR-2001-001 (Palo Alto, CA: CISAC, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jared S. Dreicer, “How Much Plutonium Could Have Been Produced in the DPRK IRT Reactor?” Science & Global Security 8, 2000: 273–286.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Peter Auer, Marcelo Alonzo, and Jack Barkenbus, “Prospects for Commercial Nuclear Power and Proliferation,” in The Nuclear Connection, Alvin Weinberg, Marcelo Alonso, and Jack Barkenbus, Editors (New York: Paragon House Publishers, 1985): 19–47.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Peter D. Zimmerman, Iraq’s Nuclear Achievements: Components, Sources, and Stature, CRS Report for Congress, Report 93-323 F (Washington, DC: Library of Congress, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  30. International Atomic Energy Agency, “Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement in the Republic of Iran,” Report by the Director General, GOV/2003/40 (June 6, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  31. David Albright and Corey Hinderstein, “Iran: Furor over Fuel,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 59, no. 3, 2003: 12–15.

    Google Scholar 

  32. David Albright and Corey Hinderstein, “The Centrifuge Connection,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 60, no. 2, 2004: 61–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. International Atomic Energy Agency, “Iran Signs Additional Protocol on Nuclear Safeguards: Signing Takes Place at IAEA,” IAEA staff report (December 18, 2003). [From: http://www.iaea.org/NewsCenter/News/2003/iranap20031218.html]

    Google Scholar 

  34. Mitchell Reiss, Bridled Ambition: Why Countries Constrain their Nuclear Capabilities (Washington, DC: The Woodrow Wilson Center Press, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Peter A. Clausen, Nonproliferation and the National Interest, America’s Response to the Spread of Nuclear Weapons (New York: HarperCollins, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Arms Control Association, “Fact Sheets: The State of Nuclear Proliferation 2001” (2001). [From: http://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/statefct.asp]

    Google Scholar 

  37. Reuters News Service, “Brazil opens uranium enrichment plant” (December 13, 2002). [From: http://www.planetark.org/dailynewsstory.cfm?newsid=19032&newsdate=13-Dec-2003 ]

    Google Scholar 

  38. “Late News in Brief,” Nuclear News 34, no. 13, October 1991: 26.

    Google Scholar 

  39. “De Klerk Tells World South Africa Built and Dismantled Six Nuclear Weapons,” Nuclear Fuels 18, no. 7, March 1993: 6.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Patrick E. Taylor and David E. Sanger, “Pakistan Called Libyans’ Source of Atom Design,” The New York Times, January 6, 2004: A1.

    Google Scholar 

  41. H. A. Feiveson, “Nuclear Power, Nuclear Proliferation, and Global Warming,” Physics and Society 32, no. 1, 2003: 11–14.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Peter D. Zimmerman, private communication, May 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Nathaniel C. Nash, “Sequel to an Old Fraud: Argentina’s Powerful Nuclear Program,” The New York Times, January 18, 1994: p. A6.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Peter D. Zimmerman, “Proliferation: Bronze Medal Technology is Enough,” Orbis 38, no. 1, 1994: 67–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. The Future of Nuclear Power, An Interdisciplinary MIT Study, John Deutch and Ernest J. Moniz, Co-chairs (Cambridge, MA: MIT, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  46. National Academy of Sciences, Management and Disposition of Excess Weapons Plutonium, Report of Committee on International Security and Arms Control, John P. Holdren, Chair (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  47. F. Berkhout, A. Diakov, H. Feiveson, H. Hunt, E. Lyman, M. Miller, and F. von Hippel, “Disposition of Separated Plutonium,” Science and Global Security 3, 1993: 161–213.

    Google Scholar 

  48. U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Dismantling the Bomb and Managing the Nuclear Materials, Report OTA-O-572 (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  49. National Academy of Sciences, Management and Disposition of Excess Weapons Plutonium: Reactor-Related Options, Report of the Panel on Reactor-Related Options for the Disposition of Excess Weapons Plutonium, John P. Holdren, Chair (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Carl E. Walter and Ronald P. Omberg, “Disposition of Weapon Plutonium by Fission,” in Future Nuclear Systems: Emerging Fuel Cycles & Waste Disposal Options, Proceedings of Global’ 93 (La Grange Park, IL: American Nuclear Society, 1993): 846–858.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag New York, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2004). Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. In: Nuclear Energy. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-26931-2_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics