Skip to main content

Nuclear Bombs, Nuclear Energy, and Terrorism

  • Chapter
Nuclear Energy
  • 4404 Accesses

Abstract

Many observers believe that the most profound problem with using nuclear energy for electricity generation is the connection between nuclear power and nuclear weapons. In this view, the threat of nuclear weapons proliferation increases if the world relies on nuclear power, because nuclear power capabilities could be translated into nuclear weapons capabilities. The relative merits of renewable energy and nuclear fission energy (omitting fusion as still speculative) as eventual substitutes for fossil fuels are highly controversial, with unresolved arguments over relative economic costs, environmental impacts, practicality, and safety. However, the weapons connection is unique to nuclear fission energy and constitutes, for some people, a reason to limit or abandon it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. U.S. Enrichment Corporation, “Status Report: U.S Russian Megatons to Megawatts Program, Turning Nuclear Warheads into Electricity” (as of September 30, 2003). [From: http://www.usec.com/v2001_02/HTML/Megatons_status.asp]

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carey Sublette, Nuclear Weapons Frequently Asked Questions, Section 1.5.1, March 8, 1995. [From: http://www.virtualschool.edu/mon/Outlaws/faql].

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Carson Mark, “Explosive Properties of Reactor-Grade Plutonium,” Science and Global Security, 4, no. 1, 1993: 111–124. Frank von Hippel and Edwin Lyman, “Probabilities of Different Yields,” Science and Global Security, 4 no. 1, 1993: 125–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Robert Serber, The Los Alamos Primer, The First Lectures on How to Build an Atomic Bomb (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Malik, E. Tajima, G. Binninger, D.C. Kaul, and G.D. Kerr, “Yields of the Bombs,” in U.S.-Japan Joint Reassessment of Atomic Bomb Radiation Dosimetry in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Final Report, W.C. Roesch, ed. (Hiroshima: Radiation Effects Research Foundation, 1987): 26–36.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Frank Barnaby, “Types of Nuclear Weapons,” in Plutonium and Security, Frank Barnaby, ed. (New York: St. Martins Press, 1992): 264–279.

    Google Scholar 

  7. William J. Schull, Effects of Atomic Radiation, A Half-Century of Studies From Hiroshima and Nagasaki (New York: Wiley-Liss, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  8. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Management of Terrorist Events Involving Radioactive Material, NCRP Report No. 138 (Washington, DC: NCRP, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Samuel Glasstone and Philip J. Dolan, The Effects of Nuclear Weapons (Washington, DC: U.S. DOE and ERDA, 1977).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Thomas B. Cochran, William M. Arkin, and Milton M. Hoenig, Nuclear Weapons Data Book, Volume I, U.S. Nuclear Forces and Capabilities (Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Theodore B. Taylor, “Nuclear Safeguards,” Annual Review of Nuclear Science 25, 1975: 407–421.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Victoria McLane, Charles L. Dunford, and Philip F. Rose, Neutron Cross Section Curves, Vol. 2, Neutron Cross Sections (New York: Academic Press, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  13. F.J. Rahn, A.G. Adamantiades, J.E. Kenton, and C. Braun, A Guide to Nuclear Power Technology, A Resource for Decision Making (New York: Wiley, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Thomas B. Cochran and Christopher E. Paine, “The Amount of Plutonium and Highly-Enriched Uranium Needed for Pure Fission Nuclear Weapons” (Washington, DC: National Resources Defense Council, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  15. National Academy of Sciences, Management and Disposition of Excess Weapons Plutonium, Report of the Committee on International Security and Arms Control (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  16. David Albright, Frans Berkhout, and William Walker, Plutonium and Highly Enriched Uranium 1996, World Inventories, Capabilities and Policies (New York: Oxford University Press, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Leonard S. Spector, Nuclear Ambitions: The Spread of Nuclear Weapons 1989–1990 (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  18. D. Albright and H.A. Feiveson, “Plutonium Recycling and the Problem of Nuclear Proliferation,” Annual Review of Energy, 13, 1988: 238–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. David Albright and Holly Higgins, “Setting the Record Straight About Plutonium Production in North Korea,” Appendix 3 of Solving the North Korean Nuclear Puzzle, David Albrightand Kevin O’Neill, eds. (Washington, DC: ISIS Press, 2000). [From: http://www.isis-online.org/publications/dprk/book/app3.html]

    Google Scholar 

  20. Frank Barnaby, Introduction, in Plutonium and Security, Frank Barnaby, ed. (New York: St. Martins Press, 1992): 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  21. World Nuclear Association, Nuclear Power in Japan (April 2003). [From: http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf79print.htm]

    Google Scholar 

  22. Myron B. Kratzer, “Demythologizing Plutonium,” paper presented at Global’ 93, Future Nuclear Systems: Emerging Fuel Cycles and Waste Disposal Options, Seattle, September 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nuclear Power Issues and Choices, Report of the Nuclear Energy Policy Study Group, Spurgeon M. Keeny, Jr., Chairman (Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Luther Carter, Nuclear Imperatives and Public Trust: Dealing with Radioactive Waste (Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  25. National Research Council, Making the Nation Safer: The Role of Science and Technology in Countering Terrorism, Report of the Committee on Science and Technology for Countering Terrorism (Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Matthew Bunn, John P. Holdren, and Anthony Wier, Securing Nuclear Weapons and Materials: Seven Steps for Immediate Action, Report co-published by the Project on Managing the Atom and the Nuclear Threat Initiative (Cambridge, MA: JFK School of Government, Harvard, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  27. C. Braun, F. Steinhausler, and L. Zaitseva, “International Terrorists Threat to Nuclear Facilities,” paper presented at American Nuclear Society 2002 Winter Meeting, Washington, DC, November 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Steve Fetter, Valery A. Frolov, Marvin Miller, Robert Mozley, Oleg F. Prilutsky, Stanislav N. Rodionov, and Roald Z. Sagdeev, “Detecting Nuclear Warheads,” Science & Global Security, 1 1990: 225–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. John Roach, “Cosmic Particles Could Detect Nuke Materials, Scientists Say,” National Geographic News, March 19, 2003. [From: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2003/03/0319_030319_cosmicrays.html]

    Google Scholar 

  30. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation, UNSCEAR 1988 Report (New York: United Nations, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Steven E. Koonin, “Radiological Terrorism,” Physics and Society 31, no. 2, April 2002: 12–13; statement delivered before Senate Foreign Relations Committee (March 6, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Robert Alvarez, et al., “Reducing the Hazards from Stored Spent Power-Reactor Fuel in the United States, Science & Global Security, 11, no. 1, 2003: 1–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Douglas M. Chapin, et al., “Nuclear Power Plants and Their Fuel as Terrorist Targets,” Science, 297, no. 5589, September 2002: 1997–1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag New York, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2004). Nuclear Bombs, Nuclear Energy, and Terrorism. In: Nuclear Energy. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-26931-2_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics