Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Research Monographs in Japan-U.S. Business & Economics ((JUSB,volume 9))

  • 224 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Drandakis, E. M. and E. S. Phelps (1966) “A Model of Induced Invention, Growth and Distribution”, Economic Journal, Vol. 76, pp. 823–840.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G. M. and E. Helpman (1993) “Endogenous Innovation in the Theory of Growth”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 8, pp. 23–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J. R. (1932) Theory of Wages, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson, D. W. (1990) “Productivity and Growth”, in E. R. Berndt and J. E. Triplet (eds.), Fifty Years of Economic Measurement: The Jubilee of the Conference on Research in Income and Wealth, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamien, M. I. and N. L. Schwartz (1969) “Induced Factor Augmenting Technical Progress for a Microeconomic Viewpoint”, Econometrica, Vol. 37, pp. 668–684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendrick, J. W. and E. S. Grossman (1980) Productivity in the United States: Trends and Cycles, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, C. (1964) “Induced Bias in Innovation and the Theory of Distribution”, Economic Journal, Vol. 74, pp. 541–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucus, R. E. Jr (1993) “Making a miracle”, Econometrica, Vol. 61, pp. 251–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, W. D. (1967) Invention, Growth and Welfare, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salter, W. E. G. (1960) Productivity and Technical Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1965) “A Theory of Induced Innovation along Kennedy-Weizäcker Lines”, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 47, pp. 343–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1970) “Law of Conservation of the Capital-Output Ratio”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, Applied Mathematical Science, pp. 1477–1479.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1983) “Thünen at Two Hundred”, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 21, pp. 1468–1488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sato, R. (1963) “Fiscal Policy in a Neoclassical Growth Model: An Analysis of the Time Required for Equilibrating Adjustment”, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 30, pp. 16–20; reprinted in Growth Theory and Technical Change: The Selected Essays of Ryuzo Sato, Vol. 1, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1970) “The Estimation of Biased Technical Progress and the Production Function”, International Economic Review, Vol. 11, pp. 179–208; reprinted in Growth Theory and Technical Change: The Selected Essays of Ryuzo Sato, Vol. 1, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1981) Theory of Technical Change and Economic Invariance, New York: Academic Press; reprinted with revisions: Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1996) “A Note on Modelling Endogenous Growth”, Keio Economic Studies, Vol. 33, pp. 93–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1997) “Optimal Economic Growth: Test of Income—Wealth Conservation Laws in OECD Countries”, working paper, Center for Japan—US Business and Economic Studies, New York University.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and R. V. Ramachandran (1987) “Factor Price Variation and the Hicksian Hypothesis”, Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 39, pp. 343–356; reprinted in Growth Theory and Technical Change: The Selected Essays of Ryuzo Sato, Vol. 1, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, R. V. Ramachandran and C. Lian (1999) “A Model of Optimal Economic Growth with Endogenous Bias”, Macroeconomic Dynamics, Vol. 3, pp. 293–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R. M. (1956) “A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 70, pp. 65–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (1957) “Technical Change and Aggregate Production Function”, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 39, pp. 312–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzawa, H. (1965) “Optimal Technical Change in an Aggregative Model of Economic Growth”, International Economic Review, Vol. 6, pp. 18–31.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2006). A Three Sector Model of Endogenous Hicksian Bias. In: Biased Technical Change and Economic Conservation Laws. Research Monographs in Japan-U.S. Business & Economics, vol 9. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-26376-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics