Skip to main content

Brainstem and State dependency of Thalamocortical Systems

  • Chapter
Brain Control of Wakefulness and Sleep
  • 1145 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Steriade and Demetrescu (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hubel (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Steriade et al. (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Steriade et al. (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  5. McCarley et al. (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Glenn and Steriade (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Domich et al. (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hirsch et al. (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Steriade (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Steriade (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Carli et al. (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Steriade (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jones et al. (1976); Hallanger et al. (1988); Semba et al. (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Earlier extracellular data reported excitatory responses of cortical neurons to stimulation of peripallidal and basal forebrain areas (Edstrom and Phillis, 1980). Contradictory results have been obtained by investigating the action of muscarinic and nicotinic blockers, administered systemically, upon the brainstem-induced potentiation of electrically evoked field responses in the visual cortex (Bremer and Stoupel, 1959; Singer, 1979) since the action could have been exerted either at the thalamic LG level or at the cortical level (see note [20]).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jones and Cuello (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Khateb et al. (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fort et al. (1995). Contrary to the depolarizing effect on cholinergic neurons, norepinephrine hyperpolarizes and inhibits noncholinergic neurons in the basal forebrain (Fort et al., 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Steriade and Glenn (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Endo et al. (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Adams et al. (1988). Those experiments also attempted to dissociate the thalamic from the cortical level of action after administration of cholinergic blockers (see note [14]).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Steriade et al. (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kulics et al. (1977); Kulics (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cauller and Kulics (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Emerson et al (1988); Yamada et al. (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Desmedt et al. (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sakakura (1968); Steriade et al (1977b); Glenn and Steriade (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Coenen and Vendrik (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Maffei et al. (1965a, b,c).

    Google Scholar 

  29. The cholinergic nature of the effects induced by stimulating the upper brainstem reticular core was shown by Francesconi et al. (1988; see also intracellular data in Section 8.1.4).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Stimulation of locus coeruleus increases the spontaneous firing as well as the responses of thalamic LG neurons to optic tract stimulation (Kayama et al., 1982), a response mediated by alpha-1 adrenergic receptors (Rogawski and Aghajanian, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Pape and Eysel (1988). Opposite, facilitatory effects were obtained in vitro by McCormick and Prince (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rivner and Sutin (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Filion et al. (1971); Steriade et al. (1971); MacLeod et al (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Curró Dossi et al. (1991); Steriade et al. (1991a, 1993a); Timofeev et al. (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Steriade (2001c).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Gucer (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Steriade and Morin (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Singer (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Singer (1977, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Sillito et al. (1983); Sillito (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Hu et al. (1989b).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Steriade and Deschêenes (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  43. The increased membrane conductance during the early nicotinic depolarization ranges from 10% up to 50% in animals treated with reserpine to avoid costimulation of axons arising from locus coeruleus. The increased conductance is sometimes observed even in the absence of overt membrane depolarization and is reflected by the decreased amplitude of the voltage deflection to a hyperpolarizing current pulse and by reduction of the rebound LTS (Curró Dossi et al., 1991). These results obtained by stimulating synaptic brainstem-thalamic pathways in vivo are similar to the effects elicited by applying ACh in vitro (McCormick and Prince, 1987a, b).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Hu et al. (1989c).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Under reserpine treatment, the duration of the late (muscarinic), long-lasting depolarization is prolonged to 40–60 s (see [42]. The late and very prolonged excitation in LG relay cells depicted in Fig. 8.4. may well be due to the action of peptides that are found in brainstem cholinergic neurons (Vincent et al, 1983, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Marks and Roffwarg (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Hirsch et al. (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Steriade et al (1990a).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Williams et al. (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Timofeev et al. (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Paré and Steriade (1990); Paré et al. (1990b). The anterior nuclear group of cat thalamus was chosen to investigate the long-term activation process induced by brainstem cholinergic stimulation because it is devoid of inputs from the thalamic reticular complex (Steriade et al, 1984a; Velayos et al., 1989) and, thus, the prolonged potentiation (up to 4 min) is not attributable to disinhibition through the cholinergic inhibition of GABAergic thalamic reticular cells.

    Google Scholar 

  52. The monkey model of severe amnesia consists of mammillary nuclei and midline/medial thalamic lesions (Aggleton and Mishkin, 1983a,b; Bentivoglio et al., 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  53. See Squire and Alvarez (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  54. This statement is based, among many other data, on the following evidence showing that thalamic (1) LG neurons exhibit far greater reduction in response to stimuli including the field surround than do retinal ganglion cells or optic tract axons (Hubel and Wiesel, 1961) and larger coefficient of variation than retinal cells, with little variability added at the cortical level (Hartveit and Heggelund, 1994); and (2) ventroposterior (VP) thalamic neurons have receptive fields that are different from those of neurons in brainstem relay stations and dynamic responses demonstrating that they are not simple relays for somatosensory signals (Alloway et al., 1994; Nicolelis and Chapin, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Hicks et al. (1986); Salt (1989). Selective lesions of thalamic reticular GABAergic neurons increase the receptive field size of VP neurons by ∼ 3-fold (Lee et al., 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Jones (1985); Steriade et al. (1997a).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Liu et al. (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Steriade et al. (1985). We showed that, after thalamic transections separating the thalamic reticular nucleus from the remaining thalamus or after excitotoxic lesions of reticular neurons, there was an increased number of GABAA-receptor-mediated IPSPs in TG neurons, as if local-circuit inhibitory neurons were released from the inhibition arising in reticular neurons. See also Fig. 4.4 in Chapter 4, depicting the circuitry of reticular, local-circuit, and TC neurons.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Jones and Powell (1969); Ralston (1971); Ohara and Lieberman (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Paré et al. (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Hirsch and Burnod (1987); Crunelli et al. (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Curró Dossi et al. (1992b).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Schlag and Waszak (1971); Yingling and Skinner (1975, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Dingledine and Kelly (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Steriade et al. (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Hu et al. (1989a).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Ahlsén (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  68. The failure to observe a nicotinic response in reticular neurons maintained in vitro (McCormick and Prince, 1986a) could well be attributed to the mode of ACh application leading to a rapid desensitization of the response. Nicotinic receptors have been mapped within the reticular thalamic nucleus of monkeys (Jones, 1985) and rats (Clarke et al., 1985). The suggestion that the early excitation in reticular neurons is produced by nicotinic receptors (Hu et al., 1989a) was subsequently confirmed in work done in thalamic slices (Lee and McCormick, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Walter et al. (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Reviewed in Hillyard and Picton (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Lang et al. (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Desmedt and Bourguet (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Mauguière and Courjon (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Picton et al. (1977, 1978); Schulman-Galambos and Galambos (1979); Desmedt (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Desmedt et al. (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Wilder et al. (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Neville and Foote (1984); Pineda et al. (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Arthur and Starr (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Wurtz et al. (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Galambos and Hillyard (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Hebb (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Evarts et al. (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Notable exceptions are Evarts and his colleagues (Evarts and Tanji, 1976; Tanji and Evarts, 1976) who have recorded identified pyramidal tract neurons in the primary motor cortex.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Mountcastle et al. (1984). Mountcastle has also studied the command functions for the exploration of extrapersonal space and attentive fixation in monkeys (Mountcastle et al., 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Wurtz and Mohler (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  86. Wurtz et al. (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  87. Mountcastle et al. (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  88. Steriade et al. (1977b).

    Google Scholar 

  89. Purpura et al. (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  90. Singer (1977); Ahlsén et al. (1984); McCormick and Prince (1986b); McCormick and Pape (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  91. Godfraind and Meulders (1969); Meulders and Godfraind (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  92. Steriade et al. (1974b).

    Google Scholar 

  93. Livingstone and Hubel (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  94. See details for the visual thalamocortical system in Steriade et al. (1990e).

    Google Scholar 

  95. Steriade and Deschênes (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  96. Swadlow and Weyand (1987).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2005). Brainstem and State dependency of Thalamocortical Systems. In: Brain Control of Wakefulness and Sleep. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-26270-9_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics