Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Fragile Families and Family Law

  • Chapter
Fragile Families and the Marriage Agenda

  • 468 Accesses

Abstract

Family law reforms concerning paternity, child support, illegitimacy, and domestic violence have helped fragile families over the past 50 years. Yet fragile families remain invisible to much of family law because historically lawmakers have focused on the problems of the middle and upper classes. Also, the law still enshrines some confining stereotypes, thus encouraging the poor to enter into unstable, dysfunctional relationships. Strengthening the culture of marriage in society and providing marriage skills training may help fragile families. This is the approach taken in a number of welfare reforms, including the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 and President Bush’s marriage initiatives. Because the law performs channeling and expressive functions in addition to regulatory functions, these marriage initiatives may be judged a success insofar as they have changed the public discourse and raised concerns about marriage as a social good for the underprivileged. Finally, prevention may be more effective than cure when it comes to helping fragile families via the law.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • The Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2002, Strengthening healthy marriages: A compendium of approaches, available at <http://faq.acf.hhs.gov>.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 2003, Healthy marriage matters to ACF, available at <http://faq.acf.hhs.gov>.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, T. D., 1993, Reclaiming law talk, book review of rights talk: the impoverishment of political discourse by Mary Ann Glendon, California Law Review, 81:803–815.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, C. D., 1966, Miracle at Philadelphia: The Story of the Constitutional Convention, Little, Brown, Boston, pp. 69–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, J. H., and Jouriles, E. N., 1995, Treatment of marital conflict and prevention of divorce, Journal of Marriage and Family Therapy 21:461–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, G. W., 2003, Marriage Protection Week: A Proclamation by the President of the United States, available at <http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/10/print/20031003-12.html>.

    Google Scholar 

  • California Evidence Code § 621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case, A., Lin, I., and McLanahan, S. S., 2000, How hungry is the selfish gene?, The Economic Journal 110:781–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, 2001, Educational attainment of siblings in stepfamilies, Evolution and Human Behavior 22:269–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Cato Institute, 2002, Bush’s welfare reauthorization plan boosts cash aid, weakens work, available at <http://www.cato.org/new/02-02/02-02-28r.html>.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cesar, S., OCSE Issues Final Paternity Establishment and Audit Rules, Child Support Rep. (Office of Child Support Enforcement, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, D.C.), Jan. 1995, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coven, M., 2002, An Introduction to TANF, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, available at <http://www.cbpp.org/1-22-02tanf2.htm>.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deuteronomy 24:20–21 (KJV).

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, S., 1971, The rule of law versus the order of custom, Social Research 38:44–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estin, A. L., 1998, Federalism and child support, Virginia Journal of Social Policy and the Law 5:541–601.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagan, P. F., Patterson, R. W., and Rector, R. E., 2002, Marriage and welfare reform: the overwhelming evidence that marriage education works, The Heritage Foundation, available at <http://www.heritage.org/research/welfare/bg1606.cfm>.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagan, P. F., 2001, Encouraging marriage and discouraging divorce, The Heritage Foundation, Policy Research and Analysis, available at <http://www.heritage.org/Research/Family/BG1421.cfm>.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fields, J., and Casper, L. M., 2001, America’s Families and Living Arrangements: 2000. Current Population Reports P20-537, U.S. Bureau of the Census, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishkin, J. S., 1983, Justice, Equal Opportunity, and the Family, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida Statutes Annotated § 61.21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida Statutes Annotated § 232.6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida Statutes Annotated § 741.04.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida Statutes Annotated § 741.0305.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study, available at <http://crcw.princeton.edu/fragilefamilies/index.asp>.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, L. L., 1969, Human interaction and the law, The American Journal of Jurisprudence 14:28–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • —., 1978, The forms and limits of adjudication, Harvard Law Review 92:353–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, M., 2003, Good news about marriage, available at <http://www.townhall.com/columnists/maggiegallagher/mg20030910.shtml>.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, I., and McLanahan, S. S., 1986, Single Mothers and Their Children, A New American Dilemma, Urban Institute Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glendon, M. A., 1987, Abortion and Divorce in Western Law, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1991, Rights Talk: The Impoverishment of Political Discourse, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glona v. American Guarantee and Liability Ins. Co., 391 U.S. 73 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez v. Perez, 409 U.S. 535, 538 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, L. A., 1998, Violence by intimates: analysis of data on crimes by current or former spouses, boyfriends, and girlfriends, Bureau of Justice Statistics Factbook (NCJ-167237), U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossberg, M., 1995, Balancing acts: crisis, change, and continuity in American family law, 1890–1990, Indiana Law Review 28:273–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gun Control Act, 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(33)(A) (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gun Control Act, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1)–(9) (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafen, B. C., 1983, The constitutional status of marriage, kinship, and sexual privacy—balancing the individual and social interests, Michigan Law Review 81:463–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, M. A., 2002, Law, medicine and trust, Stanford Law Review 55:463–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, C. C., and McLanahan, S. S., 1998, Father absence and youth incarceration, paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, San Francisco, California, available at <http://crcw.princeton.edu/papers.html>.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, B. J., 1998, Domestic violence overview, Manual for the 1st Judicial Circuit Family Violence Symposia § 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, A. J., 1998, Reflections on covenant marriage, The Family in America November: 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, B., 2002, Using excited utterances to prosecute domestic violence in New York: The door opens wide, Cardozo Women’s Law Journal 8:171–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, O. W., 1920, The path of the law, in: Collected Legal Papers, Harcourt, Brace and Howe, New York, pp. 167–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtsworth-Munroe, A., and Markman, H., 1995, The need for marital violence prevention efforts—A behavioral-cognitive secondary prevention program for engaged and newly married couples, Applied and Preventative Psychology 4:77–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horn, W., 2002, Promoting marriage as a means for promoting fatherhood, in: Revitalizing the Institution of Marriage for the Twenty-First Century: An Agenda for Strengthening Marriage, A. J. Hawkins, L. D. Wardle and D. O. Coolidge, eds., Praeger, Westport, p. 101.

    Google Scholar 

  • In re Baby M., 537 A.2d 1227 (N.J. 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • In re Findlay, 253 N.Y. 1, 170 N.E. 471, 472–473 (N.Y. 1930).

    Google Scholar 

  • Insabella, G. M., Williams, T., and Pruett, M. K., 2003, Individual and coparenting differences between divorcing and unmarried fathers, Family Court Review 41:290–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isaiah 1:17 (KJV).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, H., 1988, Silent Revolution: The Transformation of Divorce Law in the United States, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson v. Calvert, 851 P.2d 776 (Cal. 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A. M., Peterson, M., and Fonner, M., 1998, Welfare reform and the domestic relations caseload, Caseload Highlights 4:3–4, available at <http://www.ncsconline.org/D_Research/csp/Highlights>.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labine v. Vincent, 401 U.S. 532, 538, 541 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lalli v. Lalli, 439 U.S. 259 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, M. E., 2002, Placing children’s interests first: Developmentally appropriate parenting plans, Virginia Journal of Social Policy and the Law 10:98–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 68, 70–71, 80 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J., 1960, Second treatise of government, in: Two Treatises of Government, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnet, M. and Smith, B., 1992, The American family, Fortune August 10, 1992:42–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malachi 3:5 (KJV).

    Google Scholar 

  • Markman, H. J., Renick, M. J., Floyd, F. J., Stanley, and Clements, M., 1993, Preventing marital distress through communication and conflict management training: a 4-and 5-year follow up, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 61:74–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markman, H. J., Floyd, F. J., Stanley, S. M., and Storaasli, R. D., 1988, Prevention of marital distress: a longitudinal investigation, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 56:210–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marriage as public policy, available at <http://www.arches.uga.edu/∼bbethany/>.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. A., Hamilton, B. E., Ventura, S. J., Menacker, F., and Park, M. M., 2002, Births: Final data for 2000, National Vital Statistics Report 50:2.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGough, L. S., 2003, Starting over: The heuristics of family relocation decision making, St. John’s Law Review 77:291–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLanahan, S. S., 1985, Family structure and the reproduction of poverty, American Journal of Sociology 90:873–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ____, 1997, The consequences of single motherhood, in: Sex, Preference, and Family: Essays on Law and Nature, D. M. Estlund and M. C. Nussbaum, eds., Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 306–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____, 1999, Father absence and the welfare of children, in: Coping With Divorce, Single Parenting, and Remarriage: A Risk and Resiliency Perspective, E. M. Hetherington, ed., Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey, pp. 117–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLanahan, S. S., and Bumpass, L. L., 1988, Intergenerational consequences of family disruption, American Journal of Sociology 94:130–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLanahan, S. S., and Sandefur, G. D., 1994, Growing Up With a Single Parent: What Hurts, What Helps, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael H. v. Gerald D., 491 U.S. 110, 115 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller v. Albright, 523 U.S. 420 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, L. W., 1999, The federalization of child support, a shift in the ruling paradigm: Child support as outside the contours of “family law”, Journal of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers 16:195–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moskowitz, S., 1998, Saving granny from the wolf: Elder abuse and neglect-their legal framework, Connecticut Law Review 31:77–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, D. G., 2000, The American Paradox: Spiritual Hunger in an Age of Plenty, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nathan, A. J., 2002, At the intersection of domestic violence and guns: The public interest exception and the Lautenberg amendment, Cornell Law Review 85:822–858.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen and Boulais v. Immigration and Naturalization Services, 533 U.S. 53 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, M. C., 2002, Welfare reauthorization: President Bush’s agenda, Georgetown Journal on Poverty Law and Policy 9:489–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols-Casebolt, A., 1994, Establishing paternity: An analysis of cases from two Arizona counties, Social Work Research 18:5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols-Casebolt, A., and Garfinkel, I., 1991, Trends in paternity adjudications and child support awards, Social Science Quarterly 72:83–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, L. C., 2002, The limits of the law and raising a sentiment for marriage, in: Revitalizing the Institution of Marriage for the Twenty-First Century: An Agenda for Strengthening Marriage, A. J. Hawkins, L. D. Wardle and D. O. Coolidge, eds., Praeger, Westport, p. 185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, L. C., 1999, “Unwed children” and their parents before the United States Supreme Court from Levy to Michael H.: Unlikely participants in constitutional jurisprudence, Capital University Law Review 28:1–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Beirne, K., 2002, Bush tries to promote marriage through welfare reform, National Review Online May 3, available at <http://www.nationalreview.com/flashback/falshbackkob050302.asp>.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, C., 1999, Domestic violence, no-contact orders and the autonomy rights of victims, Boston College Law Review 40:937–967.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Farrell, T. J., Murphy, C. M., Neavins, T. M., and Van Hutton, V., 2000, Verbal aggression among male alcoholic patients and their wives in the year before and two years after alcoholism treatment, Journal of Family Violence 15:300–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of the Press Secretary, 2002, Press release: president announces welfare reform agenda, available at <http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/02/2002022611.html>.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ooms, T., 2002, Strengthening couples and marriage in low-income communities, in: Revitalizing the Institution of Marriage for the Twenty-First Century: An Agenda for Strengthening Marriage, A. J. Hawkins, L. D. Wardle and D. O. Coolidge, eds., Praeger, Westport, pp. 79–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, B. J., Flango, C. R., Way, K. G., LaFountain, R. C., and Fonner, M. J., 1994, State Court Caseload Statistics: Annual Report 1992, National Center for State Courts, 26:16–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, B. J., Kauder, N. B., and LaFountain, R. C., 2002, Examining the Work of State Courts, 2002: A National Perspective from the Court Statistics Project, National Center for State Courts, 35:9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parham v. Hughes, 421 U.S. 347 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-193, 110 Stat. 2105, 2110 (1996) (codified in multiple sections, especially in title 42 U.S.C.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, Pub. L. No 104–193, § 104, codified at 42 U.S.C. § 601 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinsof, W. M., and Wynne, L. C., 1995, The efficacy of marital and family therapy: An empirical overview, conclusions, and recommendations, Journal of Marriage and the Family Therapy 21:585–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Placek, P. J., 1999, National adoption data, in: Adoption Factbook III, C. Marshner, W. L. Pierce, eds., National Council for Adoption, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portwood, S. G., La Fond, J. Q., and Kinnison, K. E., 2001, Social science contributions to the study of domestic violence within the law school curriculum, Loyola Law Review 47:137–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Psalms 82:3 (KJV).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rennison, C. M., and Welchans, S., 2000, Intimate Partner Violence, U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivera, J., 1997–98, Preliminary report: Availability of domestic violence services for Latina survivors in New York state, Buffalo Public Interest Law Journal 16:1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotondo, A. M., 1997, Helping families help themselves: Using child support enforcement to reform our welfare system, California Western Law Review 33:281–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saylor, E. S., 2002, Federalism and the family after Morrison: An examination of the Child Support Recovery Act, the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act, and a federal law outlawing gun possession by domestic violence abusers, Harvard Women’s Law Journal 25:57–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, C. E., 2002, Legal acts and cultural admonitions, in: Revitalizing the Institution of Marriage for the Twenty-First Century: An Agenda for Strengthening Marriage, A. J. Hawkins, L. D. Wardle and D. O. Coolidge, eds., Praeger, Westport, p. 177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, C. E., 1992, The channeling function in family law, Hofstra Law Review 20:495–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solzhenitsyn, A. I., 1984, A world split apart, Commencement address delivered at Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spaht, K. S., 1998, Louisiana’s covenant marriage: Social analysis and legal implications, Louisiana Law Review 59:63–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, S. M., 2001, Making a case for premarital education, Family Relations 50:272–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, J., 1978, Locke, Rousseau, and the Idea of Consent: An Inquiry Into the Liberal-Democratic Theory of Political Obligation, Greenwood Press, Westport.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, M. A., and Gelles, R. J., 1990, How violent are American families? Estimates from the national family violence survey and other studies, in: Physical Violence in American Families: Risk Factors and Adaptations to Violence in 8,145 Families, M. A. Strauss and R. J. Gelles, eds., Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, pp. 95–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Symposium: individualism and communitarianism in contemporary legal system: tensions and accommodations, 1993, Brigham Young University Law Review 1993:385–742.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatum, M. L., 2001–02, A jurisdicational quandary: challenges facing tribal governments in implementing the full faith and credit provisions of the Violence Against Women Acts, Kentucky Law Journal 90:123–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. S., 2001, Heated debate on welfare may focus on marriage, Women’s eNews, available at <http://www.womensenews.org/article.cfm/dyn/aid/467/context/archive>.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ten Broek, J., 1964, California’s dual system of family law: its origin, development, and present status, Stanford Law Review 16:287–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____, J., 1971, Family Law and the Poor: Essays, J. F. Handler, ed., Greenwood Publishing Corporation, Westport.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjaden, P., and Thoennes, N., 2002, Extent, nature, and consequences of intimate partner violence: findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey, National Institute of Justice, iii, available at <http://www.ncjrs.org/pdffiles1/nij/181867.pdf>.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tocqueville, Alexis, 1961, Democracy in America, vol. I, H. Reeve, trans., Schoken Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census, 2001a, Table 632: child support enforcement programs—caseload and collections, 1980–1998, in: Statistical Abstract of the United States, available at <http://www.census.gov/prod/2001pubs/statab/sec12.pdf>.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census, 2001b, Table 602: number of families receiving specified sources of income, in: Statistical Abstract of the United States, available at <http://www.census.gov/prod/2001pubs/statab/sec12.pdf>.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utah Code Annotated § 30-6-1(2) (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Utah Code Annotated § 77-36-1 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Violence Against Women Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2261 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Violence Against Women Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2262 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Violence Against Women Act, 42 U.S.C. § 13981(d)(2)(A) (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardle, L. D., 1997, Liberty, equality and the quest for family justice in the United States, in: Families and Justice, Bruyland, Brussels, pp. 208–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardle, L. D., and Nolan, L. C., 2002, Fundamental Principles of Family Law, William S. Hein and Co., Buffalo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber v. Aetna Casualty Insurance Co., 406 U.S. 164, 175, 184 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, M. H., 2000, International child abduction and the escape from domestic violence, Fordham Law Review 69:593–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetzstein, C., 2001, Welfare promotes marriage, The Washington Times September 16, available at <http://www.washingtontimes.com>.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____, 2002, Promarriage initiatives win enthusiastic survey support, The Washington Times July 12, available at <http://www.washingtontimes.com>.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, L., 2002, Mandatory family mediation and domestic violence, Southern Illinois University Law Journal 26:559–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • The White House, 2002, Working toward Independence, executive summary, available at <http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/02/welfare-book-01.html>.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, W. C., 1997, The paradox of paternity establishment: As rights go up, rates go down, University of Florida Journal of Law and Public Policy 8:261–281.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. J. Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah

    Lynn D. Wardle

Authors
  1. Lynn D. Wardle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Family and Consumer Studies, University of Utah, 225 South 1400 East, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112-0080, USA

    Lori Kowaleski-Jones  & Nicholas H. Wolfinger  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wardle, L.D. (2006). Fragile Families and Family Law. In: Kowaleski-Jones, L., Wolfinger, N.H. (eds) Fragile Families and the Marriage Agenda. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-26025-0_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation