Cell Adhesion and Motility

Part of the Biological and Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering book series (BIOMEDICAL)


Growth Cone Neural Cell Adhesion Molecule Energy Landscape Adhesive Contact Leukocyte Rolling 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and Further Reading

Cell Migration

  1. Laufenburger DA, and Horwitz AF [1996]. Cell migration: A physically integrated process. Cell, 84: 359–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ridley AJ [2001]. Rho GTPases and cell migration. J. Cell Sci., 114: 2713–2722.Google Scholar


  1. Boudreau NJ, and Jones PL [1999]. Extracellular matrix and integrin signaling: The shape of things to come. Biochem. J., 339: 481–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Giancotti FG, and Ruoslahti E [1999]. Integrin signaling. Science, 285: 1028–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hogg, N, et al. [2003]. T-cell integrins: More than just sticking points. J. Cell Sci., 116:4695–4705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Howe A, et al. [1998]. Integrin signaling and cell growth control. Curr. Opin Cell Biol., 10: 220–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hynes RO [2002]. Integrins: Bidirectional, allosteric signaling machines. Cell, 110:673–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Shimaoka M, et al. [2003]. Structure of the αL I domain and its complex with ICAM-1 reveals a shape shifting pathway for integrin regulation. Cell, 112:99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Takagi J, et al. [2002]. Global conformational rearrangements in integrin extracellular domains in outside-in and inside-out signaling. Cell, 110: 599–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar


  1. Boggon TJ, et al. [2002]. C-cadherin ectodomain structure and implications for cell adhesion mechanisms. Science, 296: 1308–1313.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. Gumbiner BM [2000]. Regulation of cadherin adhesive activity. J. Cell Biol., 148:399–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Yagi T, and Takeichi M [2000]. Cadherin superfamily genes: Functions, genomic organization, and neurologic diversity. Genes Dev., 14: 1169–1180.Google Scholar
  4. Yap AS, and Kovacs EM [2003]. Direct cadherin-activated cell signaling: A view from the plasma membrane. J. Cell Sci., 160: 11–16.Google Scholar
  5. Yap AS, Niessen CM, and Gumbiner BM [1998]. The juxtamembrane region of the cadherin cytoplasmic tail supports lateral clustering, adhesive strengthening, and interaction with p120ctn. J. Cell Biol., 141: 779–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Immunoglobulin Family Cell Adhesion Molecules (IgCAMs)

  1. Crossin KL, and Krushel LA [2000]. Cellular signaling by neural cell adhesion molecules of the immunoglobulin superfamily. Developmental Dynamics, 218:260–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Fields RD, and Itoh K [1996]. Neural cell adhesion molecules in activity-dependent development and synaptic plasticity. Trends Neurosci., 19: 473–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Klemke RL, et al. [1997]. Regulation of cell motility by mitogen-activated protein kinase J. Cell Biol., 137: 481–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Rosales C, et al. [1995]. Signal transduction by cell adhesion receptors. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1242: 77–98.Google Scholar


  1. Kansas GS [1996]. Selectins and their ligands: Current concepts and controversies. Blood, 88: 3259–3287.Google Scholar
  2. Vestweber D, and Blanks JE [1999]. Mechanisms that regulate the function of selectins and their ligands. Physiol. Rev., 79: 181–213.Google Scholar

Adhesive Forces Probed by AFM and Optical Tweezers

  1. Jiang G, et al. [2003]. Two-piconewton slip bond between fibronectin and the cytoskeleton depends on talin. Nature, 424: 334–337.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. Kellermayer MS, et al. [1997]. Folding-unfolding transitions in single titin molecules characterized with laser tweezers. Science, 276: 1112–1116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Oberhauser AF, et al. [1998]. The molecular elasticity of the extracellular matrix protein tenascin. Nature, 393: 181–185.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. Rief M, et al. [1997]. Reversible unfolding of individual titin immunoglobulin domains by AFM. Science, 276: 1109–1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Firm Adhesion, Shear Stresses, and Rolling

  1. Evans E [1998]. Energy landscapes of biomolecular adhesion and receptor anchoring at interfaces explored with dynamic force spectroscopy. Faraday Discuss., 111:1–16.zbMATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. Genbacev OD, et al. [2003]. Trophoblast L-selectin-mediated adhesion at the maternal-fetal interface. Science, 299: 405–408.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. Marshall BT, et al. [2003]. Direct observation of catch bonds involving cell-adhesion molecules. Nature, 423: 190–193.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. Merkel R, et al. [1999]. Energy landscapes of receptor-ligand bonds explored with dynamic force microscope. Nature, 397: 50–53.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. Smith MJ, Berg EL, and Lawrence MB [1999]. A direct comparison of selectinmediated transient, adhesive events using high temporal resolution. Biophys. J., 77: 3371–3383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Axon Guidance and Growth

  1. Araújo SJ, and Tear G [2003]. Axon guidance mechanisms and models: Lessons from invertebrates. Nature Rev. Neurosci., 4: 910–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Goldberg JL [2003]. How does an axon grow? Genes Dev., 17: 941–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Goodman CS, and Shatz CJ [1993]. Developmental mechanisms that generate precise patterns of neuronal connectivity. Cell, 72/Neuron, 10(suppl.): 77–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Tessier-Lavigne M, and Goodman CS [1996]. The molecular biology of axon guidance. Science, 274: 1123–1133.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Netrins, Slits and Their Receptors

  1. Bashaw GJ, and Goodman CS [1999]. Chimeric axon guidance receptors: The cytoplasmic domains of slit and netrin receptors specify attraction versus repulsion. Cell, 97: 917–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brose K, et al. [1999]. Slit proteins bind Robo receptors and have an evolutionalily conserved role in repulsive axon guidance. Cell, 96: 795–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Goodhill GJ [2003]. A theoretical model of axon guidance by the Robo code. Neural Comput., 15: 549–564.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hong KS, et al. [1999]. A ligand-gated association between cytoplasmic domains of UNC5 and DCC family receptors converts netrin-induced cone attraction to repulsion. Cell, 97: 927–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kidd T, Bland KS, and Goodman CS [1999]. Slit is the midline repellent for the Robo receptor in Drosophila. Cell, 96: 785–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ming GL, et al. [2002]. Adaptation in the chemotactic guidance of nerve growth cones. Nature, 417: 411–418.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Semaphorins, Scatter Factors, Their Receptors, and Invasive Growth

  1. Giordano S, et al. [2002]. The semaphorin 4D receptor controls invasive growth by coupling with Met. Nature Cell Biol., 4: 720–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Goshima Y [2002]. Semaphorins as signals for cell repulsion and invasion. J. Clin. Investig., 109: 993–998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Maina F, and Klein R [1999]. Hepatocyte growth factor, a versatile signal for developing neurons. Nature Neurosci., 2: 213–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Tamagnone L, and Comoglio PM [2000]. Signaling by semaphorin receptors: Cell guidance and beyond. Trends Cell Biol., 10: 377–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eph Receptors and Ephrins

  1. Holder N, and Klein R [1999]. Eph receptors and ephrins: Effectors of morphogenesis. Development, 126: 2033–2044.Google Scholar
  2. Kullander K, and Klein R [2002]. Mechanisms and functions of Eph and ephrin signaling. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 3: 475–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Mellitzer G, Xu QL, and Wilkinson DG [1999]. Eph receptors and ephrins restrict cell intermingling and communication. Nature, 400: 77–81.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. Orioli D, and Klein R [1997]. The Eph receptor family: Axonal guidance by contact repulsion. Trends Genet., 13: 354–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Wilkinson DG [2001]. Multiple roles of Eph receptors and ephrins in neural development. Nature Rev. Neurosci., 2: 155–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References on the Theory of Slip and Catch Bonds

  1. Bell GI [1978]. Models for specific adhesion of cells to cells. Science, 200: 618–627.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dembo M, et al. [1988]. The reaction-limited kinetics of membrane-to-surface adhesion and detachment. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 234: 55–83.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Personalised recommendations