Summary
Studies on spatial cognition in primates and other animals indicate that landmarks serve as reference points, and may be encoded as distance and/or direction vectors in navigating to concealed or out-of-sight goals (dens, nests, feeding sites). In the present research, we conducted an experimental field study of spatial cognition and foraging strategies in a group of 15 wild white-faced capuchins (C. capucinus) in northeastern Costa Rica (10°26′N, 83°47′W). Specifically, we examined the ability of wild capuchins to use the geometric relationships of an array of two and three landmark cues to predict the location of baited feeding sites. The research design involved the construction of eight visually identical feeding platforms arranged in a circle with a diameter of 8 m. We then conducted a series of six experiments in which the relative spatial positions of experimentally manipulated landmarks (yellow- and pink-colored poles measuring 2 m in height) were the only information available to the forager to efficiently distinguish the location of reward and sham feeding sites. Our results indicate that over the course of 55 consecutive days and 227 experimental trials, the capuchins visited the feeding platforms 3262 times. Group members quickly learned to attend to the spatial positions of landmark arrays and use this information to compute the location of reward platforms. In addition, given that foragers arrived at the feeding station from different directions and encountered alternative views of the landmarks, it is possible that the capuchins were able to mentally rotate the configuration of the landmark array to efficiently solve this foraging problem.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bicca-Marques, J. C. and Garber, P. A. 2005, The use of social and ecological information in primate foraging decisions. Int. J. Primatol. 26
Biegler, R. and Morris, R. G. M. 1996, Landmark stability: Further studies pointing to a role in spatial learning. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 49:307–345.
Boinski, S., Quatrone, R. P., and Swarts, H. 2001, Substrate and tool use by brown capuchins in Suriname: Ecological contexts and cognitive bases. Am. Anthropol. 102:741–761.
Cheng, K. 1989, The vector sum model of pigeon landmark use. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process. 15:366–375.
Cheng, K. and Spetch, M. L. 1998, Mechanisms of landmark use in mammals and birds, in: S. D. Healy, ed., Spatial Representation in Animals, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 1–17.
Dyer, F. C. 1991, Bees acquire route-based memories but not cognitive maps in a familiar landscape. Anim. Behav. 41:239–246.
Dyer, F. C. 2000, Group movement and individual cognition: Lessons from social insects, in: S. Boinski and P. A. Garber, eds., On the Move: How and Why Animals Travel in Groups, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 127–164.
Fedigan, L. M. 1993, Sex differences and intersexual relations in adult white-faced capuchins, Cebus capucinus. Int. J. Primatol. 14:853–877.
Gallistel, C. R. 1990, The Organization of Learning. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Garber, P. A. 1988, Foraging decisions during nectar feeding by tamarin monkeys (Saguinus mystax and Saguinus fuscicollis, Callitrichidae, Primates) in Amazonian Peru. Biotropica 20:100–106.
Garber, P. A. 1989, Role of spatial memory in primate foraging patterns: Saguinus mystax and Saguinus fuscicollis. Am. J. Primatol. 19:203–216.
Garber, P. A. 2000, Evidence for the use of spatial, temporal, and social information by primate foragers, in: S. Boinski and P. A. Garber, eds., On the Move: How and Why Animals Travel in Groups, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 261–298.
Garber, P. A. and Brown, E. 2004, Wild capuchins (Cebus capucinus) fail to use tools in experimental field study. Am. J. Primatol. 62:165–170.
Garber, P. A. and Dolins, F. L. 1996, Testing learning paradigms in the field: Evidence for use of spatial and peceptual information and rule-based foraging in wild moustached tamarins, in: M. Norconk, A. L. Rosenberger, and P. A. Garber, eds., Adaptive Radiations in Neotropical Primates, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 201–216.
Garber, P. A. and Paciulli, L. M. 1997, Experimental field study of spatial memory and learning in wild capuchin monkeys (Cebus capucinus). Folia Primatol. 68:236–254.
Gibson, B. M. and Kamil, A. C. 2001, Test for cognitive mapping in Clark’s nutcracerks (Nucifraga columbiana). J. Comp. Pyschol. 115:403–407.
Janson, C. H. 1996, Towards an experimental socioecology of primates: Examples for Argentine brown capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella nigritus), in: M. Norconk, A. L. Rosenberger, and P. A. Garber, eds., Adaptive Radiations in Neotropical Primates, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 309–325.
Janson, C. H. 1998, Experimental evidence for spatial memory in foraging wild capuchin monkeys, Cebus apella. Anim. Behav. 55:1129–1143.
Janson, C. H. and Di Bitetti, M. S. 1997, Experimental analysis of food detection in capuchin monkeys: Effects of distance, travel speed, and resource size. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 41:17–24.
Johnson, D. P., Kays, R., Blackwell, P. G., and Macdonald, D. W. 2002, Does the resource dispersion hypothesis explain group living? Trends Ecol. Evol. 17:563–570.
Kamil, A. C., Balda, R. P., and Good, S. 1999, Patterns of movement and orientation during caching and recovery by Clark’s nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana). J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process. 16:162–168.
Kamil A. C. and Cheng, K. 2001, Way-finding and landmarks: The multiple-bearings hypothesis. J. Exp. Biol. 204:103–113.
Menzel, C. R. 1991, Cognitive aspects of foraging in Japanese monkeys. Anim. Behav. 41:397–402.
Menzel, C. R. 1996, Structure-guided foraging in lion-tailed macaques. Am. J. Primatol. 38:117–132.
Menzel, C. R., Savage-Rumbaugh, E. S., and Menzel, E. W. Jr. 2002, Bonobo (Pan pansicus) spatial memory and communication in a 20-hectare forest. Int. J. Primatol. 23:601–620.
Panger M. A. 1998, Object-use in free-ranging white-faced capuchins (Cebus capucinus) in Costa Rica. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 106:311–321.
Poucet, B. 1993, Spatial cognitive maps in animals: Hew hypotheses on their structure and neural mechanism. Psychol. Rev. 100:163–182.
Roberts, A. D. L. and Pearce, J. M. 1998, Control of spatial behavior by an unstable landmark. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process. 24:172–184.
Robinson, J. G. 1986, Seasonal variations in use of time and space by wedge-capped capuchin monkeys, Cebus olivaceus: Implications for foraging theory. Smithsonian Control. Zool. 431:1–60.
Rose, L. M. 1998, Behavioral ecology of white-faced capuchins (Cebus capucinus) in Costa Rica. PhD Thesis, Washington University, St. Louis.
Shettleworth, S. J. 1998, Cognition, Evolution, and Behavior. Oxford University Press, New York.
Spetch, M. L., Cheng, K., and MacDonald, S. E. 1996, Learning the configuration f a landmark array: I. Touch-screen studies with pigeons and humans. J. Comp. Psychol. 110:55–58.
Tomasello, M. and Call, J. 1997, Primate Cognition. Oxford University Press, New York.
Vander Wall, S. B. 1990, Food Hoarding in Animals. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Vauclair, J., Fagot, J., and Hopkins, W. D. 1993, Rotation of mental images in baboons when the visual input is directed to the left cerebral hemisphere. Psychol. Sci. 4:99–103.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Spring Science+Business Media, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Garber, P.A., Brown, E. (2006). Use of Landmark Cues to Locate Feeding Sites in Wild Capuchin Monkeys (Cebus capucinus): An Experimental Field Study. In: Estrada, A., Garber, P.A., Pavelka, M.S.M., Luecke, L. (eds) New Perspectives in the Study of Mesoamerican Primates. Developments in Primatology: Progress and Prospects. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-25872-8_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-25872-8_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-25854-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-25872-0
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)