Skip to main content

Constructing a Preference-Oriented Index of Environmental Quality

A Welfare-Theoretic Generalization of the Concept of Environmental Indices

  • Chapter
Book cover Advances in Public Economics: Utility, Choice and Welfare

Part of the book series: Theory and Decision Library C: ((TDLC,volume 38))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ahlheim, M. 1993. Zur Theorie rationierter Haushalte. Ein Beitrag über die Berücksichtigung limitierter staatlicher Subventionsprogramme in der Haushaltstheorie, Heidelberg: Physica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahlheim, M. 1998. “Measures of Economic Welfare”, in: S. Barbera, P.J. Hammond, and C. Seidl (eds.): Handbook of Utility Theory, Vol. 1: Principles, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher, 483–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahlheim, M. 2003. “Zur ökonomischen Bewertung von Umweltveränderungen”, in: B. Genser (ed.): Finanzpolitik und Umwelt, Berlin: Duncker und Humblot, 9–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, R. G. D. 1975. Index Numbers in Theory and Practice, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, N., C. Simmons, and M. Wackernagel. 2000. Sharing Nature’s Interest — Ecological Footprints as an Indicator of Sustainability, London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaton, A., and J. Muellbauer. 1980: Economics and Consumer Behavior, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Den Butter, F. A. G. 1992. “The Mirror of Cleanliness: On the Construction and Use of an Environmental Index”, in: J.J. Krabbe and W.J.M. Heiman (eds.): National Income and Nature: Externalities, Growth and Steady State, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 49–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Den Butter, F. A. G., and J. A. C. van der Eyden. 1998: “A Pilot Index for Environmental Policy in the Netherlands”, Energy Policy 26(2), 95–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebert, U., and H. Welsch. 2004. “Meaningful Environmental Indices: A Social Choice Approach”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 47, 270–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, I. 1927. The Making of Index Numbers, A study of Their Varieties, Tests, and Reliability, 3rd edition (reprinted in 1967), Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hope, C., and J. Parker. 1990. “Environmental Information for All-The Need for a Monthly Index”, Energy Policy 18(4), 312–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hope, C., and J. Parker. 1995. “Environmental Indices for France, Italy and the UK”, European Environment 5, 13–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inhaber, H. 1974. “Environmental Quality: Outline for a National Index for Canada”, Science 186, 798–805.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, S. M. 2002. “A Sensitivity Analysis of the Korean Composite Environmental Index”, Ecological Economics 43, 159–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markandya, A., and N. Dale. 2001. Measuring Environmental Degradation. Developing Pressure Indicators for Europe, Cheltenham.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2001. OECD Environmental Indicators. Towards Sustainable Development, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ott, W. R. 1978. Environmental Indices. Theory and Practice, Ann Arbor, Michigan: Ann Arbor Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollak, R. A. 1978. “Welfare Evaluation and the Cost of Living Index in the Household Production Model”, American Economic Review 68, 285–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, W. E. 1992. “Ecological Footprints and Appropriated Carrying Capacity: What Urban Economics Leaves Out”, Environment and Urbanization 4(2), 121–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rees, W. E. 2000. “Eco-footprint Analysis: Merits and Brickbats”, Ecological Economics 32(3), 371–374.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ten Brink, B. J. E., S. H. Hosper, and F. Colijn. 1991. “A Quantitative Method for Description and Assessment of Ecosystems: The AMOEBA-approach”, Marine Pollution Bulletin 23, 265–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggering, H., and F. Müller. 2004: Umweltziele und Indikatoren. Wissenschaftliche Anforderungen an ihre Festlegung und Fallbeispiele, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, B. W. 2004. “Health-related Environmental Indices and Environmental Equity in England and Wales”, Environment and Planning A 36, 803–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ahlheim, M., Frör, O. (2005). Constructing a Preference-Oriented Index of Environmental Quality. In: Schmidt, U., Traub, S. (eds) Advances in Public Economics: Utility, Choice and Welfare. Theory and Decision Library C:, vol 38. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-25706-3_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics