Abstract
Software process improvement (SPI) is a well-known approach to enhance software quality and business efficiency. The approach has been widely used, discussed, adopted, and criticized within the software community since Watts Humphrey’s introduction of SPI in 1989. SPI is a particular instance of diffusion of innovations. One challenging difficulty within diffusion of innovations is crossing the chasm between early adopters and early majority. To explore this issue in relation to SPI, we have studied an initiative implementing a new change request process and tool at the telecom company Ericsson AB in Gothenburg, Sweden. An action research approach was adopted with the double purpose of supporting the SPI initiative toward success while at the same time learning about tactics that SPI change agents can adopt to successfully cross the chasm. The study identifies a tactic, the guerrilla tactic, that SPI change agents can use to successfully cross the chasm and it discusses lessons from practicing this tactic in relation to the SPI and diffusion of innovation literature.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrahamsson, P. “Rethinking the Concept of Commitment in Software Process Improvement.” Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems (13), 2001, pp. 69–98.
Andersson, I., and Nilsson, K. “Improving Diffusion Practices in a Software Organization,” in Proceedings of the 35 th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Science, Volume 8, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 2002.
Bach, J. “Enough About Process: What We Need Are Heroes,” IEEE Software (12:2), 1995, pp. 96–98.
Bartunek, J. M., and Louis, M. R. Insider/Outsider Team Research, Qualitative Research Methods, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1996.
Baskerville, R., Levine, L., Pries-Heje, J., Ramesh, B., and Slaughter, S. “How Internet Software Companies Negotiate Quality,” IEEE Computer (14:5), 1999, pp. 51–57.
Baskerville, R., and Pries-Heje, J. “Grounded Action Research: A Method for Understanding IT in Practice,” Management and Information Technology (9), 1999, pp. pp. 1–23.
Bollinger, T. B., and McGowan, C. “A Critical Look at Software Capability Evaluations,” IEEE Software (8:4), 1991, pp. 25–41.
Börjesson, A. “Improve by Improving the Improvers,” paper presented at the 27th Information Systems Research in Scandinavia Working Conference on Learn, Know and Move IT, Falkenberg, Sweden, 2004.
Börjesson, A., and Mathiassen, L. “Organization Dynamics in Software Process Improvement: The Agility Challenge,” in IT Innovation for Adaptablity and Competitiveness, B. Fitzgerald and E. Wynn (Eds.), Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004a, pp. 135–156.
Börjesson, A., and Mathiassen, L. “Successful Process Implementation,” IEEE Software (21:4), 2004b, pp. 36–44.
Davison, R., Maris, M. and Kock, N. “Principles of Canonical Action Research,” Infomation Systems Journal (14), 2004, pp. 65–86.
Delone, W., and McLean, E. “Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable,” Information Systems Research (3:1), March 1992), pp. 60–95.
Eason, K. Information Technology and Organizational Change, London: Tyler & Francis, 1988.
Fayad, M. E., and Laitinen, M. “Process Assessment Considered Wasteful,” Communications of the ACM (40:11), 1997, pp. 125–128.
Fichman, R. G., and Kemerer, C. F. “The Illusory Diffusion of Innovation: An Examination of Assimlation Gaps,” Information Systems Research (10:3), 1999, pp. 255–275.
Fowler, P., and Levine, L. “Technology Transition Pull: A Case Study of Rate Monotonic Analysis, Part 2,” Working Paper CMU/SEI-93-TR-031, ADA275637, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 1993.
Galliers, R. D. “Choosing an Information Systems Research Approach,” in Information Systems Research: Issues, Methods, and Practical Guidelines, R. D. Galliers (Ed.), Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1992. pp. 144–162.
Grady, R. B. Successful Software Process Improvement, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1997.
Holmberg, L., and Mathiassen, L. “Survival Patterns in Fast-Moving Software Organizations.,” IEEE Software (18:6), 2001, pp. 51–55.
Humphrey, W. S. Managing the Software Process, Reading, MA: Addison Wesley, 1989.
Humphrey, W. S., and Curtis, B. “Comments on a Critical Look at Software Capability Evaluations,” IEEE Software (8:4), 1991, pp. 42–46.
Kautz, K., Hansen, H. W., and Thaysen, K. “Understanding and Changing Software Organisations: An Exploration of Four Perspectives on Software Process Improvement,” in Diffusing Software Product and Process Innovations, M. A. Ardis and B. L. Marcolin (Eds.), Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001, pp. 87–109.
Lyytinen, K., and Rose, G. M. “Disruptive Nature of Information Technology Innovations: The Case of Internet Computing in Systems Development Organizations,” MIS Quarterly (27:4), December 2003, pp. 557–595.
Mathiassen, L. “Collaborative Practice Research,” Information, Technology & People (15:4), 2002, pp. 321–345.
McFeeley, B. “IDEAL. A User’s Guide for Software Process Improvement,” Handbook CMU/SEI-96-HB-001, The Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 1996.
Moore, G. Crossing the Chasm: Marketing and Selling Technology Products to Mainstream Customers (revised ed.), New York: Harper Collins Publishers, 2002.
Moore, G. Inside the Tornado: Marketing Strategies from Silicon Valley’s Cutting Edge (revised ed.), New York: Harper Collins Publishers, 1999.
Paulk, M. C. “Structured Approaches to Managing Change,” Crosstalk—The Journal of Defense Software Engineering (12:11), 1999, pp. 4–7.
Paulk, M. C, Weber, C. V., Curtis, B., and Crissis, M. B. The Capability Maturity Model: Guidelines for Improving the Software Process, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1995.
Pries-Heje, J., and Tryde, S. “Diffusion and Adoption of IT Products and Processes in a Danish Bank,” in Diffusing Software Product and Process Innovations, M. A. Ardis and B. L. Marcolin (Eds.), Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001, pp. 17–34.
Rogers, E. M. Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.), New York: Free Press, 2003.
Susman, G., and Evered, R. “An Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research,” Administrative Science Quarterly (23), 1978, pp. 582–603.
Weinberg, G. M. Quality Software Management Volume IV: Anticipating Change, New York: Dorset House Publishing, 1997.
Yin, R. Case Study Research, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1994
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Börjesson, A., Martinsson, F., Timmerås, M. (2005). Crossing the Chasm in Software Process Improvement. In: Baskerville, R.L., Mathiassen, L., Pries-Heje, J., DeGross, J.I. (eds) Business Agility and Information Technology Diffusion. TDIT 2005. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, vol 180. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-25590-7_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-25590-7_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-25589-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-25590-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)