Skip to main content

In Situ Conservation: Methods and Costs

  • Chapter
  • 1053 Accesses

Part of the book series: Natural Resource Management and Policy ((NRMP,volume 27))

Abstract

Conservation policies will be pursued with quite different sets of instruments and conservation methods depending on the objectives and the costs implied. In this chapter, the objectives of genetic resources conservation are discussed and in situ conservation methods are described, and the costs related to these conservation methods are analyzed. This chapter demonstrates that despite the intensive multilateral discussions regarding the potential and the political will of various countries to foster in situ conservation activities, the direct costs have not yet been assessed, much less the related indirect costs which will be even more difficult to assess. It is discussed that agrobiodiversity is largely produced by farmers as a positive externality without any conservation program costs. In the future, assuming a risk of an unplanned loss of traditional varieties, the question will be with what economic instruments and incentives can agrobiodiversity be kept at the social optimum, securing nonmarketable genetic resources? It is argued that efficient interventions as well as flexible and self-targeting incentive mechanisms are needed to enable the farmers to benefit from the product agrobiodiversity and at the same time to decrease the social opportunity costs of in situ conservation without losing varieties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexandratos, N., ed., 1995, World Agriculture: Towards 2010: An FAO Study, John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Altieri, M. A., Merick, L. C, and Anderson, M. K., 1987, Peasant agriculture and the conservation of crop and wild plant genetic resources, Conservation Biology 1:49–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Altieri, M. A., and Montecinos, C, 1993, Conserving crop genetic resources in Latin America through farmers’ participation, in: Perspectives on Biodiversity: Case Studies of Genetic Resource Conservation and Development, C. S. Potter, J. I. Cohen, and D. Janczewski, eds.,AAAS Publication, Washington, D. C., pp.45–64.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bolster, J. S., 1985, Selection for perceptual distinctiveness: Evidence from Aguarana cultivars of Manihot esculenta, Economic Botany 39:310–325.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brush, S. B., 1991, Farmer conservation of new world crops: The case of Andean potatoes, Diversity 7:75–79.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brush, S. B., and Meng, E., 1996, Farmers’ valuation and conservation of crop genetic resources, paper presented at the CEIS-Tor Vergata University, Symposium on the Economics of Valuation and Conservation of Genetic Resources for Agriculture (May 13–15, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bücken, S., 1997, Personal communication at the genebank of the Federal Centre for Breeding Research on Cultivated Plants, Braunschweig.

    Google Scholar 

  8. CMIE (Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy), 1988, Basic Statistics Relating to the Indian Economy, Vol. I: All-India, CMIE Pvt. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cooper, H. D., and Cromwell, E., 1994, In situ conservation of crop genetic resources in developing countries: The influence of economic, policy and institutional factors, Draft Discussion Paper 1, Rural Poverty and Resources Research Programme, ODA.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Engelman, R., and LeRoy, P., 1995, Conserving Land: Population and Sustainable Food Production, Population Action International, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  11. FAO, 1998, The State of the World’s Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, FAO, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  12. (German Country Report), 1995, Country Report on Status of Plant Genetic Resources Germany, Submitted to FAO in the preparatory process for the International Technical Conference on Plant Genetic Resources, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  13. GEF (Global Environment Facility), 1997, Quarterly Operational Report (June, 1997), GEF, Washington, D. C.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gehl, J., 1997, Kosten-Wirksamkeits-Analyse zur Bewahrung genetischer Ressourcen, Fallbeispiele aus Deutschland und Peru, Diplomarbeit, Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universitat zu Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gupta, A. K., 1996, Personal Communication, Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad.

    Google Scholar 

  16. ICR (Indian Country Report), 1995, Country Report on Status of Plant Genetic Resources India, Submitted to FAO in the preparatory process for the International Technical Conference on Plant Genetic Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Meng, E., Taylor, J. E., and Brush, S. B., 1997, Household varietal choice decisions and policy implications for the conservation of wheat landraces in Turkey, Draft Paper presented at the Symposium: Building the Theoretical and Empirical Basis for the Economics of Genetic Diversity and Genetic Resources Conservation in Crop Plants, Held at Stanford University, Palo Alto, California (August 17–19, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Morris, M. L., and Heisey, P. W., 1997, Achieving desirable levels of crop genetic diversity in farmers’ fields: Factors affecting the production and use of improved seed, paper presented at the Symposium: Building the Theoretical and Empirical Basis for the Economics of Genetic Diversity and Genetic Resources Conservation in Crop Plants, Held at Stanford University, Palo Alto, California (August 17–19, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  19. NRC (National Research Council), 1993, Managing Global Genetic Resources: Agricultural Crop Issues and Policies, National Academy Press, Washington, D. C.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Perrings, C, and Pearce, D., 1994, Threshold effects and incentives for the conservation of biodiversity, Environ, and Res. Econ. 4:13–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pretty, J. N., 1995, Regenerating Agriculture: Policies and Practice for Sustainability and Self-Reliance, Earthscan Publications Ltd., London.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pundis, R. P. S., 1996, Personal communication, ICRISAT.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Robertson, J., 1992, Biosphere reserves: Relations with natural world heritage sites, Parks 3:29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Swanson, T. M., Pearce, D. W., and Cervigni, R., 1994, The Appropriation of the Benefits of Plant Genetic Resources for Agriculture: An Economic Analysis of the Alternative Mechanisms for Biodiversity Conservation, FAO Commission on Plant Genetic Resources, Background Study Paper No. 1, FAO, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  25. UNEP (United Nations Environment Program), 1994, Convention on Biological Diversity, Text and Annexes, Interim Secretariat for the Convention on Biological Diversity, Geneva Executive Center, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Vicente, P. R., 1994, The MASIPAG program: An integrated approach to genetic conservation and use, in: Growing Diversity in Farmers Fields, Proceedings of a Regional Seminar for Nordic Development Cooperation Agencies, Lidingo, Sweden (September 26–28, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Virchow, D., 1999, Conservation of Genetic Resources: Costs and Implications for a Sustainable Utilization of Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  28. von Braun, J., and Virchow, D., 1997, Conflict-prone formation of markets for genetic resources: Institutional and economic implications for developing countries. Quart. J. Inter. Agri. 1:6–38.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Worede, M., 1992, The role of Ethiopian farmers in the conservation and utilization of crop genetic resources, First Int. Crop Sci. Congress, Ames, Iowa.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Joseph Cooper Leslie Marie Lipper David Zilberman

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Virchow, D. (2005). In Situ Conservation: Methods and Costs. In: Cooper, J., Lipper, L.M., Zilberman, D. (eds) Agricultural Biodiversity and Biotechnology in Economic Development. Natural Resource Management and Policy, vol 27. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-25409-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics