Abstract
Conservation policies will be pursued with quite different sets of instruments and conservation methods depending on the objectives and the costs implied. In this chapter, the objectives of genetic resources conservation are discussed and in situ conservation methods are described, and the costs related to these conservation methods are analyzed. This chapter demonstrates that despite the intensive multilateral discussions regarding the potential and the political will of various countries to foster in situ conservation activities, the direct costs have not yet been assessed, much less the related indirect costs which will be even more difficult to assess. It is discussed that agrobiodiversity is largely produced by farmers as a positive externality without any conservation program costs. In the future, assuming a risk of an unplanned loss of traditional varieties, the question will be with what economic instruments and incentives can agrobiodiversity be kept at the social optimum, securing nonmarketable genetic resources? It is argued that efficient interventions as well as flexible and self-targeting incentive mechanisms are needed to enable the farmers to benefit from the product agrobiodiversity and at the same time to decrease the social opportunity costs of in situ conservation without losing varieties.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alexandratos, N., ed., 1995, World Agriculture: Towards 2010: An FAO Study, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
Altieri, M. A., Merick, L. C, and Anderson, M. K., 1987, Peasant agriculture and the conservation of crop and wild plant genetic resources, Conservation Biology 1:49–58.
Altieri, M. A., and Montecinos, C, 1993, Conserving crop genetic resources in Latin America through farmers’ participation, in: Perspectives on Biodiversity: Case Studies of Genetic Resource Conservation and Development, C. S. Potter, J. I. Cohen, and D. Janczewski, eds.,AAAS Publication, Washington, D. C., pp.45–64.
Bolster, J. S., 1985, Selection for perceptual distinctiveness: Evidence from Aguarana cultivars of Manihot esculenta, Economic Botany 39:310–325.
Brush, S. B., 1991, Farmer conservation of new world crops: The case of Andean potatoes, Diversity 7:75–79.
Brush, S. B., and Meng, E., 1996, Farmers’ valuation and conservation of crop genetic resources, paper presented at the CEIS-Tor Vergata University, Symposium on the Economics of Valuation and Conservation of Genetic Resources for Agriculture (May 13–15, 1996).
Bücken, S., 1997, Personal communication at the genebank of the Federal Centre for Breeding Research on Cultivated Plants, Braunschweig.
CMIE (Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy), 1988, Basic Statistics Relating to the Indian Economy, Vol. I: All-India, CMIE Pvt. Ltd.
Cooper, H. D., and Cromwell, E., 1994, In situ conservation of crop genetic resources in developing countries: The influence of economic, policy and institutional factors, Draft Discussion Paper 1, Rural Poverty and Resources Research Programme, ODA.
Engelman, R., and LeRoy, P., 1995, Conserving Land: Population and Sustainable Food Production, Population Action International, Washington, D.C.
FAO, 1998, The State of the World’s Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, FAO, Rome.
(German Country Report), 1995, Country Report on Status of Plant Genetic Resources Germany, Submitted to FAO in the preparatory process for the International Technical Conference on Plant Genetic Resources, 1995.
GEF (Global Environment Facility), 1997, Quarterly Operational Report (June, 1997), GEF, Washington, D. C.
Gehl, J., 1997, Kosten-Wirksamkeits-Analyse zur Bewahrung genetischer Ressourcen, Fallbeispiele aus Deutschland und Peru, Diplomarbeit, Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universitat zu Bonn.
Gupta, A. K., 1996, Personal Communication, Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad.
ICR (Indian Country Report), 1995, Country Report on Status of Plant Genetic Resources India, Submitted to FAO in the preparatory process for the International Technical Conference on Plant Genetic Resources.
Meng, E., Taylor, J. E., and Brush, S. B., 1997, Household varietal choice decisions and policy implications for the conservation of wheat landraces in Turkey, Draft Paper presented at the Symposium: Building the Theoretical and Empirical Basis for the Economics of Genetic Diversity and Genetic Resources Conservation in Crop Plants, Held at Stanford University, Palo Alto, California (August 17–19, 1997).
Morris, M. L., and Heisey, P. W., 1997, Achieving desirable levels of crop genetic diversity in farmers’ fields: Factors affecting the production and use of improved seed, paper presented at the Symposium: Building the Theoretical and Empirical Basis for the Economics of Genetic Diversity and Genetic Resources Conservation in Crop Plants, Held at Stanford University, Palo Alto, California (August 17–19, 1997).
NRC (National Research Council), 1993, Managing Global Genetic Resources: Agricultural Crop Issues and Policies, National Academy Press, Washington, D. C.
Perrings, C, and Pearce, D., 1994, Threshold effects and incentives for the conservation of biodiversity, Environ, and Res. Econ. 4:13–28.
Pretty, J. N., 1995, Regenerating Agriculture: Policies and Practice for Sustainability and Self-Reliance, Earthscan Publications Ltd., London.
Pundis, R. P. S., 1996, Personal communication, ICRISAT.
Robertson, J., 1992, Biosphere reserves: Relations with natural world heritage sites, Parks 3:29–34.
Swanson, T. M., Pearce, D. W., and Cervigni, R., 1994, The Appropriation of the Benefits of Plant Genetic Resources for Agriculture: An Economic Analysis of the Alternative Mechanisms for Biodiversity Conservation, FAO Commission on Plant Genetic Resources, Background Study Paper No. 1, FAO, Rome.
UNEP (United Nations Environment Program), 1994, Convention on Biological Diversity, Text and Annexes, Interim Secretariat for the Convention on Biological Diversity, Geneva Executive Center, Switzerland.
Vicente, P. R., 1994, The MASIPAG program: An integrated approach to genetic conservation and use, in: Growing Diversity in Farmers Fields, Proceedings of a Regional Seminar for Nordic Development Cooperation Agencies, Lidingo, Sweden (September 26–28, 1993).
Virchow, D., 1999, Conservation of Genetic Resources: Costs and Implications for a Sustainable Utilization of Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, Springer, Heidelberg
von Braun, J., and Virchow, D., 1997, Conflict-prone formation of markets for genetic resources: Institutional and economic implications for developing countries. Quart. J. Inter. Agri. 1:6–38.
Worede, M., 1992, The role of Ethiopian farmers in the conservation and utilization of crop genetic resources, First Int. Crop Sci. Congress, Ames, Iowa.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Virchow, D. (2005). In Situ Conservation: Methods and Costs. In: Cooper, J., Lipper, L.M., Zilberman, D. (eds) Agricultural Biodiversity and Biotechnology in Economic Development. Natural Resource Management and Policy, vol 27. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-25409-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-25409-9_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-25407-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-25409-8
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)