Skip to main content

Private Research and Public Goods: Implications of Biotechnology for Biodiversity

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Natural Resource Management and Policy ((NRMP,volume 27))

Abstract

The pattern of crop genetic diversity in the developing world has changed over the past two centuries with the modernization of agriculture, accelerating with the advent of the green revolution. Since the green revolution, the locus of agricultural research has shifted from the public to the private sector. The growing importance of the private sector in agricultural R&D is changing the types of crop technologies that are developed and the ways they are delivered to farmers, perhaps best illustrated by transgenic crops which are being developed and commercialized almost exclusively by private multinational companies. The spread of transgenic crops will influence crop genetic diversity, but their implications for the availability of plant genetic resources and the resilience of agricultural ecosystems are not entirely clear. Transgenic crops, per se, may increase or decrease crop genetic diversity, depending on how they are regulated and deployed. This paper explores a range of policy options to increase the likelihood that private sector R&D, particularly in the form of transgenic crops, enhances rather than erodes crop genetic diversity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ammann, K., 2004, Biodiversity and agricultural biotechnology: A review of the impact of agricultural biotechnology on biodiversity, Botanischer Garten Bern. (March 2004); http://www.botanischergarten.ch/EFB/Report-Biodiv-Biotech6.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boserup, E., 1981, Population and Technological Change: A Study of Long Term Change, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, D., May, O., and Creech, J., 2003, Genetic uniformity of the US upland cotton crop since the introduction of transgenic cottons, Crop Science, 43:515–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A., Clegg, M., Kahler, A., and Weir, B., eds., 1990, Plant Population Genetics: Breeding and Genetic Resources, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byerlee, D., and Fischer, K., 2002, Accessing modern science: Policy and institutional options for agricultural biotechnology in developing countries, World Dev., 30(6):931–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalrymple, D. G., 1988, Changes in wheat varieties and yields in the United States, 1919–1984, Agri History 62(4):20–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Groote, H., Mugo, S., Bergvinson, D., and Owuor, G., 2004, Debunking the myths of GM crops for Africa: The case of Bt maize in Kenya, Paper presented to FAO (February 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • Evenson, R. E., and Gollin, D., 2003, Assessing the impact of the green revolution: 1960–1980, Science, 300:758–762.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • FAO, 2004, Agricultural biotechnology: Meeting the needs of the poor, The State of Food and Agriculture: 2003–04, FAO, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, J. G., 1983, The Diversity of Crop Plants, Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayami, Y., and Ruttan, V. W., 1985, Agricultural Development: An International Perspective. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Council for Science (ICSU), 2003, New Genetics, Food and Agriculture: Scientific Discoveries-Societal Dilemmas (March 2004); http://www.icsu.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, C, 2003, Preview: Global Status of Commercialized Transgenic Crops: 2003, ISAAA Briefs No. 30, ISAAA: Ithaca, NY (March 2004); www.isaaa.org/kc/CBTNews/press release/brief30/es b30/pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, F. G. H., 1992, Wheat varieties cultivated in Europe, in: Changes in Varietal Distribution of Cereals in Central and Western Europe: Agroecological Atlas of Cereal Growing in Europe, Vol. 4, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M., 1998, Maize Seed Industries in Developing Countries. Lynne Rienner Publishers: Boulder, Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pingali, P., 1997, From subsistence to commercial production systems: The transformation of Asian agriculture, Amer. J. Agri. Econ. 79:628–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pingali, P., and Heisey, P. W., 2001, Cereal-crop productivity in developing countries: Past trends and future prospects, in: Agricultural Science Policy, J. M. Alston, P. G. Pardey, and M. Taylor, eds., IFPRI & Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pingali, P., and Smale, M., 2001, Agriculture, industrialized. Encyclopaedia of Biodiversity, Vol. 1. Academic Press, pp. 85–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pingali, P., and Traxler, G., 2002, Changing locus of agricultural research: Will the poor benefit from biotechnology and privatization trends? Food Policy, 27:223–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porceddu, E., Ceoloni, C, Laflandra, D., Tanzarella, O. A., and Scarascia Mugnozza, G. T., 1988, Genetic resources and plant breeding: Problems and prospects, The Plant Breeding International, Cambridge Special Lecture, pp. 7–21. Institute of Plant Science Research, Cambridge, U. K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pray, C. E., Huang, J., Hu, R., and Rozelle, S., 2002, Five years of B1 cotton in China#x2014;The benefits continue, The Plant Journal, 31(4):423–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pray, C. E., and Naseem, A., 2003, The economics of agricultural biotechnology research, ESA Working Paper No. 03-07, FAO, Rome, Italy (March 2004); http://www.fao.org/es/esa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qaim, M., and Traxler, G., 2004, Roundup-ready soybeans in Argentina: Farm level, environmental and welfare effects, Agr. Econ., forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smale, M., 1997, The Green Revolution and wheat genetic diversity: Some unfounded assumptions, World Dev., 25(8):1257–1269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sneller, C, 2003, Impact of transgenic genotypes and subdivision on diversity within elite North American soybean germplasm, Crop Science, 43:409–414; http://crop.scijournals.org/cgi/reprint/43/l/409.pdf.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Traxler, G., 2004, The economic impacts of biotechnology-based technological innovations. ESA Working Paper No. 04-08, FAO, Rome, Italy (June, 2004); http://www.fao.org/es/ESA/pdf/wp/ESAWP04_08.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Joseph Cooper Leslie Marie Lipper David Zilberman

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Raney, T., Pingali, P. (2005). Private Research and Public Goods: Implications of Biotechnology for Biodiversity . In: Cooper, J., Lipper, L.M., Zilberman, D. (eds) Agricultural Biodiversity and Biotechnology in Economic Development. Natural Resource Management and Policy, vol 27. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-25409-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics