Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Adoption of Biotechnology in Developing Countries

  • Chapter
Agricultural Biodiversity and Biotechnology in Economic Development

Part of the book series: Natural Resource Management and Policy ((NRMP,volume 27))

Abstract

This chapter identifies the factors that lead to the adoption of genetically modified varieties in developing countries and the sources of differences in the impacts and patterns of adoption of biotechnology between developed and developing countries. We present the finding of our model analyzing the profitability of pest-controlling biotechnologies. The model shows that in locations with mild pest issues, adoption of GMVs is likely to result in reduced pesticide use while in areas with high infestation levels, as is the case in many developing countries, adoption of GMVs will have both a pesticide-reducing and a yield-enhancing effect. Thus, successful adoption of biotechnologies in developing countries will depend on the availability of technologies appropriate for local agricultural conditions, and policies that enhance the ability of poor farmers to obtain these technologies such an affordable pricing schemes and credit programs. Following the conceptual model, the chapter provides some of the empirical findings on adoption of biotechnology for both developed and developing countries, discusses adoption and biosafety issues and, in the last section, synthesizes our results and provides further policy conclusions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alexander, C, Fernandez-Cornejo, J., and Goodhue, R., 2002, Determinants of GM use: A survey of Iowa corn soybean farmers’ acreage allocation, in: Market Development for Genetically Modified Foods, R. Evenson, V. Santaniello, and D. Zilberman, eds., CABI Publishers, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullock, D., and Nitsi, E., 2001, Roundup ready soybean technology and farm production costs, Amer. Behavioral Scientist 44: 283–1301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, J., and Gianessi, L., 1999, Herbicide tolerant soybeans: Why growers are adopting roundup ready varieties. AgBioForum. 2:65–72. Retrieved July 15, 1999, from the World Wide Web: http://www.agbioforum.missouri.edu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darr, D. A., and Chern W. S., 2002, Estimating adoption of GMO soybeans and maize: A case study of Ohio, USA, in: Market Development for Genetically Modified Foods, R. Evenson, V. Santaniello, and D. Zilberman, eds., CABI Publishers, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S. W., 1979, Interfirm diffusion of process innovations, European Econ. Rev. 12: 299–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falck-Zepeda, J. B., Traxler, G., and Nelson, R. G., 2000, Surplus distribution from the introduction of a biotechnology innovation, Amer. J. Agri. Econ. 82:360–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Cornejo, J., Daberkow, S., and McBride, W. D., 2001, Decomposing the size effect on the adoption of innovations: agrobiotechnology and precision farming. Selected paper presented at the American Agricultural Economics Association Annual meeting, Chicago, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisvold, G. B., Sullivan, J., and Raneses, A., 2003, Genetic improvements in major U. S. crops: the size and distribution benefits, Agri. Econ., 28:109–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulton, M, and Keyowski, L., 1999, The producer benefits of herbicide-resistant Canola. AgBioForum 2:85–93. Retrieved July 15, 1999, from the World Wide Web: http://www.agbioforum.missouri.edu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z., 1957, Hybrid corn: An exploration in the economics of technological change, Econometrica 25:501–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haung, J., Qiao, F., Pray, C, and Rozelle, S., 2001, Biotechnology as an alternative to chemical pesticide use: Lessons from Bt cotton in China. Paper presented at the 5th ICABR International Conference on Biotechnology, Science and Modern Agriculture: A New Industry at the Dawn of the Century, Ravello, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J., Hu, R., Fan, C, Pray, C, and Rozelle, S., 2002, Bt cotton benefits, costs, and impacts in China, AgBioForum 4:153–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herring, J., 2003, Underground seeds: Lessons of India’s Bt cotton episode for representations of the poor, property claims and biosafety regimes. Paper presented at the Transgenics and the Poor Conference, Cornell University, New York, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbell, B., Marra, M., and Carlson, G., 2000, Estimating the demand for a new technology: Bt cotton and insecticide policies, Amer. J. Agri. Econ. 82: 118–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ismael, Y., Beyers, L., Lin, L., and Thirtle, C, 2001, Smallholder adoption and economic impacts of Bt cotton in the Makhathini Flats, South Africa. Paper presented at the 5th ICABR International Conference on Biotechnology, Science and Modern Agriculture: A New Industry at the Dawn of the Century, Ravello, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, W., Falconi, C, and Komen, J., 2000, The role of NARS in providing biotechnology access to the poor: grassroots for an ivory tower, in: Agricultural Biotechnology in Developing Countries: Towards Optimizing the Benefits for the Poor, M. Qaim, A. F. Krattiger, and J. von Braun, eds., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Massachusetts, pp. 357–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayaraman, K. S., 2001, Illegal Bt cotton in India haunts regulators, Nature Biotechnology 19: 1090.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, K., Traxler, G., and Wilson, N., 2001, The economics of value enhanced crops: Status, institutional arrangements and benefit sharing. Paper presented at the 5th ICABR International Conference on Biotechnology, Science and Modern Agriculture: A New Industry at the Dawn of the Century, Ravello, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Just, R. E., and Zilberman, D., 1988, The effects of agricultural development policies on income distribution and technological change in agriculture, J. of Dev. Econ. 28:192–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenberg, E., 1989, Land quality, irrigation development, and cropping patterns in the northern high plains, Amer. J. Agrl Econ. 71:187–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenberg, E., and Zilberman, D., 1986, The econometrics of damage control: Why specification matters, Amer. J. Agri Econ. 68:262–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E., 1981, Composition of R and D expenditures: Relationship to size of firm, concentration, and innovative output, Rev. Econ. and Stat. 63:610–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marra, M. C., Hubbell, B. J., and Carlson, G., 2001, Information quality, technology depreciation, and Bt cotton adoption in the southeast, J. Agrl Res. Econ. 26:158–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moschini, G., Lapan, H., and Sobolevsky, A., 2000, Roundup Ready® soybeans and welfare effects in the soybean complex, Agribusiness—An Inter. J. 16:33–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, G., Lin, W., and Falck-Zepeda, J. B., 2001, The distribution of benefits resulting from biotechnology adoption. AJAE Annual Meeting, Chicago, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qaim, M., 2002, Personal communication (January 21, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Qaim, M., and Zilberman, D., 2003, Yield effects of genetically modified crops in developing countries, Science 299:900–902.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E., 1995, Diffusion of Innovations, Free Press, 4th ed., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, T. W., 1975, The value of the ability to deal with disequilibria, J. Econ. Literature. 13:827–846.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunding, D., and Zilberman, D., 2001, The agricultural innovation process: Research and technology adoption in a changing agricultural sector, in: The Handbook of Agricultural Economics, G. C. Rausser and B. Gardner, eds., North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, pp. 1–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traxler, G., Godoy-Avila, S., Falck-Zepeda, J., and Espinoza-Arellano, J. de J., 2001, Transgenic cotton in Mexico: Economic and environmental impacts. Paper presented at the 5th ICABR International Conference on Biotechnology, Ravello, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weibers, U.-C, 1993, Economic and environmental effects of pest management information and pesticides: The case of processing tomatoes in California. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Free University of Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, 207 Giannini Hall, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA

    Holly Ameden (Ph.D. Candidate)

  2. Department of Agricultural Economics and Social Sciences, University of Hohenheim, 70593, Stuttgart, Germany

    Matin Qaim (Professor)

  3. Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, 207 Giannini Hall, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA

    David Zilberman (Professor)

Authors
  1. Holly Ameden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Matin Qaim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. David Zilberman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Joseph Cooper Leslie Marie Lipper David Zilberman

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ameden, H., Qaim, M., Zilberman, D. (2005). Adoption of Biotechnology in Developing Countries. In: Cooper, J., Lipper, L.M., Zilberman, D. (eds) Agricultural Biodiversity and Biotechnology in Economic Development. Natural Resource Management and Policy, vol 27. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-25409-9_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation