Skip to main content

Transport and Climate Policy Modeling the Transport Sector: The Role of Existing Fuel Taxes in Climate Policy

  • Chapter
Energy and Environment

Abstract

Existing fuel taxes play a major role in determining the welfare effects of exempting the transportation sector from measures to control greenhouse gases. To study this phenomenon we modify the MIT Emissions Prediction and Policy Analysis (EPPA) model to disaggregate the household transportation sector. This improvement requires an extension of the GTAP data set that underlies the model. The revised and extended facility is then used to compare economic costs of cap-and-trade systems differentiated by sector, focusing on two regions: the USA where the fuel taxes are low, and Europe where the fuel taxes are high. We find that the interplay between carbon policies and pre-existing taxes leads to different results in these regions: in the USA exemption of transport from such a system would increase the welfare cost of achieving a national emissions target, while in Europe such exemptions will correct pre-existing distortions and reduce the cost.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Agras, J. and Chapman, R. (1999). The Kyoto Protocol, CAPE standards, and gasoline taxes. Contemporary Economic Policy, 17(3):296–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archibald, R. and Gillingham, R. (1981). A Decomposition of the price and income elasticities of the consumer demand for gasoline. Southern Economic Journal, 47:1021–1031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babiker M., Criqui P., Ellerman D., Reilly J., and Viguier, L. (2003). Assessing the impact of carbon tax differentiation in the European Union. Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 8(3):187–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babiker, M., Reilly, J., Mayer, M., Eckaus, R., Sue Wing, I., and Hyman, R. (2001). The MIT Emissions Prediction and Policy Analysis (EPPA) Model: Revisions, Sensitivities, and Comparison of Results. Report 71, MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change. Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babiker M., Metcalf, G., and Reilly, J. (2003). Tax distortions and global climate policy. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 46:269–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babiker, M., Reilly J. and Viguier, L. (2004). Is international emissions trading always beneficial? The Energy Journal, 25(2):33–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, J.-F. (2002). La consommation automobile depuis quarante ans. INSEE Première, vol. 844, INSEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, A., Paltsev, S., Reilly, J., Vielle, M., and Viguier, L., (2003). Russia's Role in the Kyoto Protocol. MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Report 98, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of European Union (2003). Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC, Official Journal of the European Union, L275:32–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, C.A. and Sterner, T. (1991). Analyzing gasoline demand elasticities: A survey. Energy Economics, 13(3):203–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimaranan B. and McDougall, R. (2002). Global Trade, Assistance, and Production: The GTAP 5 Data Base. Center for Global Trade Analysis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • EUROSTAT (1999). Household Budget Survey of 1999. Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Protection Agency (2002). Annex D, Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990–2000, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Atmospheric Programs, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, D.J. and Glaister, S. (2002). The demand for automobile fuel: A survey of elasticities. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 36(1):1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, D.L., Kahn, J.R., and Gibson, R.C. (1999). Fuel economy rebound effect for US household vehicle. The Energy Journal, 20(3):1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagler Bailly (1999). Potential for Fuel Taxes to Reduce Greenhouse Emissions from Transport, Transportation Table of the Canadian National Climate Change Process. Hagler Bailly Inc., Arlington, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haughton, J., and Sarkar, S. (1996). Gasoline tax as a corrective tax: Estimates for the United States, 1970–1991. The Energy Journal, 17(2):103–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertel, T. (1997). Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, R.C., Reilly, J.M., Babiker, M.H., de Masin, A., and Jacoby, H.D. (1997). Modeling non-CO2 greenhouse gas abatement. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 8(3):175–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Energy Agency (2000a). Energy Balances of OECD Countries 1997–1998. Paris, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Energy Agency (2000b), Energy Statistics of Non-OECD Countries, 1997–1998. Paris, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Energy Agency (2001). Energy Prices and Tahxes, 1999. Paris, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, H., Eckaus, R., Ellermann, A.D., Prinn, R., Reiner, D., and Yang, Z. (1997). CO2 emissions limits: Economic adjustments and the distribution of burdens. The Energy Journal, 18:31–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, H. and Sue Wing, I. (1999). Adjustment time, capital malleability, and policy cost. The Energy Journal, Special Issue, The Costs of the Kyoto Protocol: A Multi-Model Evaluation, 73–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson, D.W., Gollop, F.M., and Fraumeni, B.M. (1987). Productivity and US Economic Growth. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahiri, S., Babiker, M., and Eckaus, R.S. (2000). The Effects of Changing Consumption Patterns on the Costs of Emission Restrictions. Report 64, MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation (2001). Statistical Abstract of India 2001. Central Statistical Organisation, New Dehli

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulton B., and Moylan, C. (2003). Comprehensive Revision of the National Income and Product Accounts 1929 Through Second Quarter 2003. Bureau of Economic Analysis, BEA News, BEA 03-48.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Bureau of Statistics of China (2002). China Statistical Yearbook 2002. China Statistics Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newbery, D. (1992). Should carbon taxes be additional to other transport fuel taxes? The Energy Journal, 13(2):49–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nivola, P and Crandall, R. (1995). The Extra Mile: Rethinking Energy Policy for Automobile Transportation. The Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1997). National Accounts of OECD Countries. OECD, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD/IEA (2004). Energy Prices and Taxes, Quarterly Statistics, 2nd Quarter. OECD/IEA, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paltsev, S., Reilly, J., Jacoby, H., Ellerman, A.D., and Tay, K.H. (2003). Emissions Trading to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the United States: The McCain — Lieberman Proposal. Report 97, MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paltsev S., Viguier, L., Babiker, M., Reilly, J., and Tay, K.H. (2004a). Disaggregating Household Transport in the MIT EPPA Model. Technical Note 5, MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paltsev, S., Reilly, J.M., Jacoby, H.D., and Tay, K. (2004b). The Cost of Kyoto Protocol Targets: The Case of Japan. Report 112, MIT Joint Program for the Science and Policy of Global Change, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reilly J., Prinn, R., Harnisch, J., Fitzmaurice, J., Jacoby, H., Kicklighter, D., Melillo, J., Stone, P., Sokolov, A., and Wang, C. (1999). Multi-gas Assessment of the Kyoto Protocol. Nature, 401:549–555.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schäfer, A. and Jacoby, H. (2003). Technology Detail in a Multi-Sector CGE Model: Transport Under Climate Policy, Report 101, MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Cambridge, MA. Also in Energy Economics. In press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Canada (2002). Survey of Household Spending 2002. Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2002). National Accounts Statistics: Main Aggregates and Detailed Tables, 1999. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Paltsev, S., Jacoby, H.D., Reilly, J.M., Viguier, L., Babiker, M. (2005). Transport and Climate Policy Modeling the Transport Sector: The Role of Existing Fuel Taxes in Climate Policy. In: Loulou, R., Waaub, JP., Zaccour, G. (eds) Energy and Environment. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-25352-1_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics