Latent alarm signals: Are they present in vertebrates?

  • Ole B. Stabell


Latent alarm signals seem to be present in vertebrates, especially in tadpoles of frogs, and the existence of such signals may explain some basic evolutionary questions in the relationships between predators and prey. The presumable inactive compounds in question may be activated by the bacterial flora within the gut of predators, explaining why taxonomically different predators may release diverse responses within one single prey species. Knowing the exact source of the alarm signals will be of utmost importance for future work within predator-prey interactions.


Crucian Carp Alarm Signal Skin Extract Common Frog Anuran Tadpole 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Brown, W. L., Eisner, T., and Whittaker, R. H., 1970, Allomones and kairomones: transspecific chemical messengers, Bioscience 20:21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brönmark, C., and Miner, J. G., 1992, Predator-induced phenotypic change in body morphology in Crucian carp, Science 258:1348.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Chivers, D. P., and Smith, R. J. F., 1998, Chemical alarm signalling in aquatic predator-prey systems: A review and prospectus, Écoscience 5:338.Google Scholar
  4. Chivers, D. P., Kiesecker, J. M., Marco, A., Wildy, E. L., and Blaustein, A. R., 1999, Shifts in life history as a response to predation in western toads (Bufo boreas), J. Chem. Ecol. 25:2455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. DeVito, J., Chivers, D., Kiesecker, J., Marco, A., Wildy, E., and Blaustein, A., 1998, The effects of snake predation on metamorphosis of western toads, Bufo boreas (Amphibia, Bufonidae), Ethology 104: 185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. DeVito, J., Chivers, D. P., Kiesecker, J. M., Belden, L. K., and Blaustein, A. R., 1999. Effects of snake predation on aggregation and metamorphosis of Pacific treefrog (Hyla regilla) larvae, J. Herpetol. 33: 504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hews, D. K., and Blaustein, A. R., 1985, An investigation of the alarm response in Bufo boreas and Rana cascadae tadpoles, Behav. Neur. Biol. 43:47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hokit, D. G., and Blaustein, A. R., 1995, Predator avoidance and alarm-response behaviour in kin-discriminating tadpoles (Rana cascadae), Ethology 101:280.Google Scholar
  9. Karlson, P., and Lüscher, M., 1959, ‘Pheromones’: a new term for a class of biological active substances, Nature 183:55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kats, L. B., and Dill, L. M., 1998, The scent of death: Chemosensory assessment of predation risk by prey animals, Écoscience 5:361.Google Scholar
  11. Kiesecker, J. M., Chivers, D. P., Anderson, M., and Blaustein, A. R., 2002, Effect of predator diet on life history shifts of red-legged frogs, Rana aurora, J. Chem. Ecol. 28:1007.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lardner, B., 1998, Plasticity or fixed adaptive traits? Strategies for predation avoidance in Rana arvalis tadpoles, Oecologia 117:119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lardner, B., 2000, Morphological and life history responses to predators in larvae of seven anurans, Oikos 88:169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Laurila, A., 2000, Behavioural responses to predator chemical cues and local variation in antipredator performance in Rana temporaria tadpoles, Oikos 88:159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Laurila, A., Kujasalo, J., and Ranta, E., 1997, Different antipredator behaviour in two anuran tadpoles: Effects of predator diet, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 40:329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Laurila, A., Kujasalo, J., and Ranta, E., 1998, Predator-induced changes in life history in two anuran tadpoles: effects of predator diet, Oikos 83:307.Google Scholar
  17. Manteifel, Y., 1995, Chemically-mediated avoidance of predators by Rana temporaria tadpoles, J. Herpetol. 29:461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mathis, A., and Smith, R. J. F., 1993, Chemical labeling of northern pike (Esox lucius) by the alarm pheromone of fathead minnows (Pimephalespromelas), J. Chem. Ecol. 19:1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McCollum, S. A., and Leimberger, J. D., 1997, Predator-induced morphological changes in an amphibian: predation by dragonflies affects tadpole shape and color, Oecologia 109:615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Petranka, J. W., Kats, L. B., and Sih, A., 1987, Predator-prey interactions among fish and larval amphibians: use of chemical cues to detect predatory fish, Anim. Behav. 35:420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pfeiffer, W., 1963, Alarm substances, Experientia (Basel) 19:113.Google Scholar
  22. Pfeiffer, W., 1966, Die Verbreitung der Schreckreaktion bei Kaulquappen und die Herkunft des Schreckstoffes, Z. vergl. Physiol. 52:79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pfeiffer, W., 1974, Pheromones in Fish and Amphibia, in: Pheromones, M.C. Birch, ed., North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp. 269–296.Google Scholar
  24. Pfeiffer, W., 1977, The distribution of flight reaction and alarm substance cells in fishes, Copeia 1977(4):653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schutz, F., 1956, Vergleichende Untersuchungen über die Schreckreaction bei Fischen und deren Verbreitung, Z. vergl. Physiol. 38:84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Skelly, D., and Werner, E., 1990, Behavioral and life-historical responses of larval American toads to an odonate predator, Ecology 71:2313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stabell, O. B., and Lwin, M. S., 1997, Predator-induced phenotypic changes in crucian carp are caused by chemical signals from conspecifics, Env. Biol. Fishes 49:145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stabell, O. B., Ogbebo, F., and Primicerio, R., 2003, Inducible defences in Daphnia depend on latent alarm signals from conspecific prey activated in predators, Chem. Senses 28:141.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stauffer, H. P., and Semlitsch, R. D., 1993, Effects of visual, chemical and tactile cues of fish on the behavioural responses of tadpoles, Anim. Behav. 46:355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Van Buskirk, J., 2001, Specific induced responses to different predator species in anuran larvae, J. Evol. Biol. 14:482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Van Buskirk, J., and Relyea, R. A., 1998, Selection for phenotypic plasticity in Rana sylvatica tadpoles, Biol. J Linn. Soc. 65:301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. von Frisch, K., 1941, Ober einen Schreckstoff der Fischhaut und seine biologishe Bedeutung, Z. vergl. Physiol. 29:46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wilson, D. J., and Lefcort, H., 1993, The effect of predator diet on the alarm response of red-legged frog, Rana aurora, tadpoles, Anim. Behav. 46:1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wilson, E. 0., and Bossert, W. H., 1963, Chemical communication among animals, Rec. Prog. Horm. Res. 19:673.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ole B. Stabell
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Natural SciencesAgder University CollegeKristiansandNorway

Personalised recommendations