The response of prey fishes to chemical alarm cues: What recent field experiments reveal about the old testing paradigm
KeywordsFathead Minnow Skin Extract Trap Experiment Alarm Substance Fish Shoal
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Chivers, D. P., and Smith, R. J. F., 1998, Chemical alarm signaling in aquatic predator-prey systems: A review and prospectus, Écoscience 5:338–352.Google Scholar
- Chivers, D. P., Wisenden, B. D., and Smith, R. J. F., 1995, The role of experience in the response of fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) to skin extract of Iowa darters (Etheostoma exile), Behaviour 132: 665–674.Google Scholar
- Wisenden, B. D., Chivers, D. P., Brown, G. E., and Smith, R. J. F., 1995, The role of experience in risk assessment: Avoidance of areas chemically labelled with fathead minnow alarm pheromone by conspecifics and heterospecifics, Écoscience 2:116–122.Google Scholar
- Wisenden, B. D., Pollock, M. S., Tremaine, R. J., Webb, J. M., Wismer, M. E., and Chivers, D. P., in press, Synergistic interactions between chemical alarm cues and the presence of conspecific and heterospecific fish shoals, Behav. Ecol Sociobiol. Google Scholar
© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005