Conclusions
There is incontrovertible evidence that the MHC region is associated with type-specific odours in a number of species. Existing experimental paradigms have demonstrated that animals can discriminate between classes of MHC-associated odour with great acuity. Furthermore, experiments on mate choice and kin selection provide convincing evidence of a functional role for these odours. At the moment, evidence for genuine individual recognition or discrimination, meaning the “learned discrimination among conspecific individuals” (Halpin, 1986; p. 44), is lacking. This is partly because the four main experimental paradigms have not been used explicitly to address the question of individual recognition, but rather to test whether broader subgroups of MHC-associated odours exist and are distinguishable. These types of experiment can certainly be adapted to test individual recognition. For example Gheusi et al., (1997) found evidence for individual discrimination by rats using operant training, although this study did not examine MHC-associated odours specifically. The experimental paradigms described here have been vital in narrowing down the search for potential sources of individual odours, and testing odour discrimination abilities. Ultimately however, they can only allow an assessment of olfactory acuity, rather than whether this acuity is put to any use. In order to demonstrate that MHC-associated odours have an adaptive role in individual recognition, functional tests in a realistic behavioural context are required. Such functional tests exist (e.g. see Rich and Hurst, 1999; Hurst et al., 2001; Lai and Johnston, 2002) and now need to be applied to the unresolved issue of MHC-associated odours and individual recognition.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aeschlimann, P. B., Hberli, M. A., Reusch, T. B. H., Boehm, T., and Milinski, M., 2003, Female sticklebacks Gasterosteus aculeatus use self-reference to optimize MHC allele number during mate selection, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 54:119–126.
Bard, J., Yamazaki, K., Curran, M., Boyse, E. A., and Beauchamp, G. K., 2000, Effect of B2m gene disruption on MHC-determined odortypes, Immunogenetics 51:514–518.
Beauchamp, G. K., Yamazaki, K., Bard, J., and Boyse, E. A., 1988, Preweaning experience in the control of mating preferences by genes in the major histocompatibility complex of the mouse, Behav. Genetics 18: 537–547.
Beauchamp, G. K., Yamazaki, K., Wysocki, C. J., Slotnick, B. M., Thomas, L., and Boyse, E. A., 1985, Chemosensory recognition of mouse major histocompatibility types by another species, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82:4186–4188.
Boyse, E. A., Beauchamp, G. K., and Yamazaki, K., 1987, The genetics of body scent, Trends Genet. 3: 97–102.
Bruce, H. M., 1960, A block to pregnancy in the mouse caused by proximity of strange males, J. Reprod. Fert. 1:96–103.
Bruce, H. M., and Parrott, D. M. V., 1960, Role of olfactory sense in pregnancy block by strange males, Science 131:1526.
Carroll, L. S., Penn, D. J., and Potts, W. K., 2002, Discrimination of MHC-derived odors by untrained mice is consistent with divergence in peptide-binding region residues, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 2187–2192.
Eggert, F., Muller-Ruchholtz, W., and Ferstl, R., 1999, Olfactory cues associated with the major histocompatibility complex, Genetica 104:191–197.
Egid, K., and Brown, J. L., 1989, The major histocompatibility complex and female mating preferences in mice, Anim. Behav. 38:548–549.
Ehman, K. D., and Scott, M. E., 2001, Urinary odour preferences of MHC congenic female mice, Mus domesticus: implications for kin recognition and detection of parasitized males, Anim. Behav. 62:781–789.
Eklund, A. C., 1999, Use of the MHC for mate choice in wild house mice (Mus domesticus), Genetica 104:245–248.
Gheusi, G., Goodall, G., and Dantzer, R., 1997, Individually distinctive odours represent individual conspecifics in rats, Anim. Behav. 53:935–944.
Halpin, Z. T., 1986, Individual odors among mammals: origins and functions, Adv. Stud. Behav. 16:39–70.
Hurst, J. L., Payne, C. E., Nevison, C. M., Marie, A. D., Humphries, R. E., Robertson, D. H. L., Cavaggioni, A., and Beynon, R. J., 2001, Individual recognition in mice mediated by major urinary proteins, Nature 414:631–634.
Iványi, P., 1978, Some aspects of the H-2 system, the major histocompatibility system in the mouse, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B. 202:117–158.
Johnston, R. E., and Bullock, T. A., 2001, Individual recognition by use of odours in golden hamsters: the nature of individual representations, Anim. Behav. 61:545–557.
Johnston, R. E., and Jernigan, P., 1994, Golden hamsters recognize individuals, not just individual scents, Anim. Behav. 48:129–136.
Klein, S. L., Gamble, H. R., and Nelson, R. J., 1999, Trichinella spiralis infection in voles alters female odor preference but not partner preference, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 45:323–329.
Lai, W. S., and Johnston, R. E., 2002, Individual recognition after fighting by golden hamsters: a new method, Physiol. Behav. 76:225–239.
Manning, C. J., Potts W. K., Wakeland, E. K., and Dewsbury, D.A., 1992a, What’s wrong with MHC mate choice experiments?, in: Chemical Signals in Vertebrates VI, R. L. Doty and D. Müller-Schwarze, eds., Plenum Press, New York, pp. 229–235.
Manning, C. J., Wakeland, E. K., and Potts, W. K., 1992b, Communal nesting patterns in mice implicate MHC genes in kin recognition, Nature 360:581–583.
Mayeaux, D. J., and Johnston, R. E., 2002, Discrimination of individual odours by hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) varies with the location of those odours, Anim. Behav. 64:269–281.
Ninomiya, K., and Brown, R.E., 1995, Removal of the preputial glands alters the individual odors of MHC-congenic mice and the preferences of females for these odors, Physiol. Behav, 58:191–194.
Olsen, K. H., Grahn, M., and Lohm, J., 2002, Influence of MHC on sibling discrimination in Arctic char, Salvelinus alpinus (L.), J. Chem. Ecol. 28:783–795.
Olsson, M., Madsen, T., Nordby, J., Wapstra, E., Ujvari, B., and Wittsell, H., 2003, Major histocompatibility complex and mate choice in sand lizards, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. (Supplement) doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2003.0079.
Pearse-Pratt, R., Schellinck, H. M., Brown, R. E., Singh, P. B., and Roser, B., 1999, Soluble MHC antigens and olfactory recognition of genetic individuality: the mechanism, Genetica, 104:223–230.
Penn, D. J., 2002, The scent of genetic compatibility: sexual selection and the major histocompatibility complex, Ethology 108:1–21.
Penn, D. J., and Potts, W. K., 1998, MHC-disassortative mating preferences reversed by cross-fostering, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 265:1299–1306.
Penn, D. J., and Potts, W. K., 1998, Untrained mice discriminate MHC-determined odors, Physiol. Behav. 63:235–243.
Penn, D. J., and Potts, W. K., 1999, The evolution of mating preferences and major histocompatibility complex genes, Am. Nat. 153:145–164.
Porter, R. H., and Moore, D., 1981, Human kin recognition by olfactory cues, Physiol. Behav., 27:493–495.
Potts, W. K., Manning, C.J., and Wakeland, E.K., 1991, Mating patterns in seminatural populations of mice influenced by MHC genotype, Nature 352:619–621.
Rich, T. J., and Hurst, J. L., 1999, The competing countermarks hypothesis: reliable assessment of competitive ability by potential mates, Anim. Behav. 58:1027–1037.
Roberts, S. C., and Gosling, L. M., 2003, Genetica similarity and quality interact in mate choice decisions by female mice, Nat. Genet. 35:103–106.
Singh, P. B., 2001, Chemosensation and genetic individuality, Reproduction 121:529–539.
Singh, P. B., 1999, The present status of the ‘carrier hypothesis’ for chemosensory recognition of genetic individuality, Genetica 104:231–233.
Wang, H., Wysocki, C. J., and Gold, G. H., 1993, Induction of olfactory receptor sensitivity in mice, Science 260:998–1000.
Wedekind, C., Seebeck, T., Bettens, F., and Paepke, A., 1995, MHC-dependent mate preferences in humans, Proc. Roy Soc. Lond. B. 260:245–249.
Weir, M. W., and de Fries, J. C., 1963, Blocking of pregnancy in mice as a function of stress, Psych. Rep. 13:365–366.
Yamaguchi, M., Yamazaki, K., Beauchamp, G. K., Bard, J., Thomas, L., and Boyse, E. A., 1981, Distinctive urinary odors governed by the major histocompatibility locus of the mouse, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78: 5817–5820.
Yamazaki, K., Beauchamp, G. K., Bard, J., and Boyse, E. A., 1990, Chemosensory identity and the Y chromosome, Behav. Genet. 20:157–165.
Yamazaki, K., Beauchamp, G. K., Curran, M., Bard, J., and Boyse, E. A., 2000, Parent-progeny recognition as a function ofMHC odortype identity, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:10500–10502.
Yamazaki, K., Beauchamp, G. K., Egorov, I. K., Bard, J., Thomas, L., and Boyse, E. A., 1983a, Sensory distinction between H-2b and H-2bm1 mutant mice, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80:5685–5688.
Yamazaki, K., Beauchamp, G. K., Matsuzaki, O., Kupniewski, D., Bard, J., Thomas, L., and Boyse, E. A., 1986, Influence of a genetic difference confined to a mutation of H-2K on the incidence of pregnancy block in mice, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83:740–741.
Yamazaki, K., Beauchamp, G. K., Shen, F.-W., Bard, J., and Boyse, E. A., 1994, Discrimination of odortypes determined by the major histocompatibility complex among outbred mice, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91: 3735–3738.
Yamazaki, K., Beauchamp, G. K., Singer, A., Bard, J., and Boyse, E. A., 1999, Odortypes: their origin and composition, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:1522–1525.
Yamazaki, K., Beauchamp, G. K., Wysocki, C. J., Bard, J., Thomas, L., and Boyse, E. A., 1983b, Recognition of H-2 types in relation to the blocking of pregnancy in mice, Science 221:186–188.
Yamazaki, K., Boyse, E. A., MikU, V., Thaler, H. T., Mathieson, B. J., Abbott, J., Boyse, J., Zayas, Z. A., and Thomas, L., 1976, Control of mating preferences in mice by genes in the major histocompatibility complex, J. Expt. Med. 144:1324–1335.
Yamazaki, K., Yamaguchi, M., Andrews, P. W., Peake, B., and Boyse, E. A., 1978, Mating preferences of F2 segregants of crosses between MHC-congenic mouse strains, Immunogenetics 6:253–259.
Zelano, B., and Edwards, S. V., 2002, An MHC component to kin recognition and mate choice in birds: predictions, progress, and prospects, Am. Nat. 160:S225–S237.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Thom, M.D., Beynon, R.J., Hurst, J.L. (2005). The role of the major histocompatibility complex in scent communication. In: Mason, R.T., LeMaster, M.P., Müller-Schwarze, D. (eds) Chemical Signals in Vertebrates 10. Springer, Boston, MA . https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-25160-X_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-25160-X_22
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-25159-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-25160-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)