Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Firms and the Creation of New Markets

  • Chapter
Handbook of New Institutional Economics

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Afuah, Allan. 2001. “Dynamic Boundaries of the Firm: Are Firms Better off Being Vertically Integrated in the Face of a Technological Change?” Academy of Management Journal 44(6): 1211–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aitken, Murray, Sunitha Baskaran, Eric Lamarre, Michael Silber, and Susan Walters. 2000. “A License to Cure”. McKinsey Quarterly 10(1): 80–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Erin and David C. Schmittlein. 1984. “Integration of the Sales Force: An Empirical Examination”. Rand Journal of Economics 15(3): 385–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Erin and Thomas S. Robertson. 1995. “Inducing Multi-Line Salespeople to Adopt House Brands”. Journal of Marketing 59: 16–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Erin and Barton Weitz. 1992. “The Use of Pledges to Build and Sustain Commitment in Distribution Channels”. Journal of Marketing Research 24: 18–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyres, Nicholas S. and Julia Porter Liebeskind. 2002. “Governance Inseparability and the Evolution of the US Biotechnology Industry”. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 47(2): 197–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyres, Nicholas S. and Julia Porter Liebeskind. 1999. “Contractual Commitments, Bargaining Power, and Governance Inspearability: Incorporating History Into Transaction Cost Theory”. Academy of Marketing Review 24(1): 49–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bain, Joseph. 1956. Barriers to Competition. Cambridge: MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, Frank M. 1969. “A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables”. Management Science 15(5): 215–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayus, Barry L., Gary Erickson, and Robert Jacobson. 2003. “The Financial Rewards of New Product Introductions in the Personal Computer Industry”. Management Science 49(2): 197–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Marshall H. 1970. “Sociometric Location and Innovativeness: Reformulation and Extension of the Diffusion Model”. American Sociological Review April: 267–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bensaou, Ben. M. and Erin Anderson. 1999. “Buyer-Supplier Relations in Industrial Markets: When Do Buyers Enter the Trap of Making Idiosyncratic Investments?” Organization Science 10: 460–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, Douglas and Hubert Gatignon. 1995. “Determinants of Competitor Response Time to a New Product Introduction”. Journal of Marketing Research 32(1): 42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, Douglas and Hubert Gatignon. 1996. “Order of Entry as a Moderator of the Effect of the Marketing Mix on Market Share”. Marketing Science 15(3): 222–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradach, Jeffrey L. 1997. “Using the Plural Form in the Management of Restaurant Chains”. Administrative Science Quarterly 42(2): 276–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breshnahan, Timothy F. and Robert J. Gordon. 1996. The Economics of New Goods. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Jacqueline and Peter H. Reingen. 1987. “Social Ties and Word-of-Mouth Referral Behavior”. Journal of Consumer Research 14: 350–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Shona L. and Kathleen M. Eisenhardt. 1995. “Product Development: Past Research, Present Findings, and Future Directions”. Academy of Management Review 20(2) 343–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capon, Noel, John U. Farley, and Scott Hoenig. 1990. “Determinants of Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis”. Management Science 36(10): 1143–1159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capron, Laurence. 1999. “The Long Term Performance of Horizontal Acquisitions”. Strategic Management Journal 20(11): 987–1018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerf, Christopher and Victor Navasky. 1984. The Experts Speak. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, Alfred D. 1977. The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu, Wujin. 1992. “Demand Signalling and Screening in Channels of Distribution”. Marketing Science 11(3): 327–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coughlan, Anne T., Erin Anderson, Louis W. Stern, and Adel I. El-Ansary. 2001. Marketing Channels, 6th Edn. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Darren W., Amitiva Chattopadhyay, and Gerald J. Gorn. 1999. “The Use of Visual Mental Imagery in New Product Design”. Journal of Marketing rq 36(1): 18–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darr, Eric D., Linda Argote, and Dennis Epple. 1995. “The Acquisition, Transfer, and Depreciation of Knowledge in Service Organizations: Productivity in Franchises”. Management Science 41(11): 1750–1762.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekimpe, Marnik G, Philip M Parker, and Miklos Sarvary. 2000. “Global Diffusion of Technological Innovations: A Coupled-Hazard Approach”. Journal of Marketing Research 37(1): 47–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz, Harold. 1982. “Barriers to Entry”. American Economic Review 72(1): 47–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, Avinash 1979. “A Model of Duopoly Suggesting a Theory of Entry Barriers”. Bell Journal of Economics 10(1): 20–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, Giovanni. 1997. “Opportunities, Incentives and the Collective Patterns of Technological Change”. The Economic Journal 107(3): 1530–1547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutta, Shantanu and George John. 1995. “Combining Lab Experiments and Industry Data in Transaction Cost Analysis: The Case of Competition as a Safeguard”. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 11: 87–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, Jeffrey H. 1995. “Specialized Supplier Networks as a Source of Competitive Advantage: Evidence from the Auto Industry”. Strategic Management Journal 11(3): 42–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliashberg, Jehoshua and Thomas S. Robertson. 1988. “New Product Preannouncing Behavior: A Market Signaling Study”. Journal of Marketing Research 25(3): 282–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fein, Adam J. and Erin Anderson. 1997. “Patterns of Credible Commitments: Territory and Category Selectivity in Industrial Distribution Channels”. Journal of Marketing 61: 19–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatignon, Hubert and Erin Anderson. 1988. “The Multinational Corporation's Degree of Control over Foreign Subsidiaries: An Empirical Test of a Transaction Cost Explanation”. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 4(2): 305–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatignon, Hubert, Jehoshua Eliashberg, and Thomas S. Robertson. 1989. “Modeling Multinational Diffusion Patterns: An Efficient Methodology”. Marketing Science 8(3): 231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatignon, Hubert and Thomas S. Robertson. 1985. “A Propositional Inventory for New Diffusion Research”. Journal of Consumer Research 11(4): 859–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatignon, Hubert and Thomas S. Robertson. 1989. “Technology Diffusion: An Empirical Test of Competitive Effects”. Journal of Marketing 53(1): 35–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatignon, Hubert and Thomas S. Robertson. 1991. “Innovative Decision Processes” in Harold Kassarjian and Thomas S. Robertson (eds.), Handbook of Consumer Behavior Theory and Research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, pp. 316–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatignon, Hubert, Thomas S Robertson, and Adam J. Fein. 1997. “Incumbent Defense Strategies Against New Product Entry”. International Journal of Research in Marketing 14(2): 163–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatignon, Hubert and Jean-Marc Xuereb. 1997. “Strategic Orientation of the Firm and New Product Performance”. Journal of Marketing Research 34(1): 77–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gielens, Katrijn and Marnik G. Dekimpe. 2001. “Do International Entry Decisions of Retail Chains Matter in the Long Run?” International Journal of Research in Marketing 18(3): 235–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Zvi. 1957. “Hybrid Corn: An Exploration in the Economics of Technical Change”. Econometrica 25(4): 501–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Zvi, Bronwyn Hall, and Ariel Pakes. 1991. “R&D, Patents, and Market Value Revisited: Is There A Second (Technological Opportunity) Factor?” Economic Innovation and New Technology 1(1): 183–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, Ranjay and Harbir Singh. 1998. “The Architecture of Cooperation: Managing Coordination Costs and Appropriation Concerns in Strategic Alliances”. Administrative Science Quarterly 43(4): 781–814.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haspeslagh, Philippe and David Jemison. 1991. Managing Acquisitions. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heide, Jan B. and George John. 1988. “The Role of Dependence Balancing in Safeguarding Transaction-Specific Assets in Conventional Channels”. Journal of Marketing 52(1): 20–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helsen, Kristiaan, Kamel Jedidi, and Wayne S. DeSarbo. 1993. “A New Approach to Country Segmentation Utilizing Multinational Diffusion Patterns”. Journal of Marketing 57: 60–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henard, David H. and David M Szymanski. 2001. “Why Some New Products Are More Successful Than Others”. Journal of Marketing Research 38(3): 362–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herr, Paul M., Frank R. Kardes, and John Kim. 1991. “Effects of Word-of-Mouth and Product-Attribute Information on Persuasion: An Accessibility-Diagnosticity Perspective”. Journal of Consumer Research 17: 454–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jap, Sandy D. 1999. “'Pie-Expansion’ Efforts: Collaboration Processes in Buyer-Supplier Relationships”. Journal of Marketing Research 36: 461–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalyanaram, Gurumurthy and Glen L. Urban. 1992. “Dynamic Effects of the Order of Entry on Market Share, Trial Penetration, and Repeat Purchases for Frequently Purchased Consumer Goods”. Marketing Science 11: 235–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, Elihu 1957. “The Two-Step Flow of Communication: An Up-To-Date Report on an Hypothesis”. Public Opinion Quarterly 21: 61–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaul, Anil and Vithala R. Rao. 1995. “Research for Product Positioning and Design Decisions: An Integrative Review”. International Journal of Research in Marketing 12(4): 293–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirmani, Amna and Akshay R. Rao. 2000. “No Pain, No Gain: A Critical Review of the Literature on Signaling Unobservable Quality”. Journal of Marketing 64: 66–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, Bruce and Nalin Kulatilaka. 2001. “Capabilities as Real Options”. Organization Science 12(6): 744–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan, V. and Karl T. Ulrich. 2001. “Product Development Decisions: A Review of the Literature”. Management Science 47(1): 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, Alan B. and Timothy Taylor. 2000. “An Interview With Zvi Griliches”. Journal of Economic Perspectives 14(2): 171–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuester, Sabine, Hubert Gatignon, and Thomas S. Robertson. 2000. “Firm Strategy and Speed of Diffusion”. in Vijay Mahajan, Eitan Muller and Yoram Wind (eds.), New-Product Diffusion Models. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard-Barton, Dorothy. 1992. “Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities: A Paradox in Managing New Products”. Strategic Management Journal 13(1): 11–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan, Vijay, Eitan Muller, and Frank Bass. 1993. “New Product Diffusion Models,” in Jehoshua Eliashberg and Gary L. Lilien (eds.), Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, pp. 349–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan, Vijay, Eitan Muller, and Yoram Wind (eds.). 2000. New-Product Diffusion Models. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mascarenhas, Briance 1992. “Order of Entry and Performance in International Markets”. Strategic Management Journal 13: 499–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, Rita Gunther. 1997. “A Real Options Logic for Initiating Technology Positioning Investments”. Academy of Management Review 22(4): 974–996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moorman, Christine. 1995. “Organizational Market Information Processes: Cultural Antecedents and New Product Outcomes”. Journal of Marketing Research 32(3): 318–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moorman, Christine and Anne S. Miner. 1997. “The Impact of Organizational Memory on New Product Performance and Creativity”. Journal of Marketing Research 34(1): 91–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayak, P. Ranganath and John M. Ketteringham. 1986. Breakthroughs! New York: Rawson Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Richard R. 1995. “Recent Evolutionary Theorizing About Economic Change”. Journal of Economic Literature 32: 48–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nerlove, Marc. 2001. “Zvi Griliches, 1930–1999: A Critical Appreciation”. The Economic Journal 111(3): F422–F448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborn, Richard N. and John Hageboorn. 1997. “The Institutionalization and Evolutionary Dynamics of Interorganizational Alliances and Networks”. Academy of Management Journal 40(2): 261–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxley, Joanne E. 1999. “Institutional Environment and the Mechanisms of Governance: the Impact of Intellectual Property Protection on the Structure of Inter-Firm Alliances”. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 38: 283–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, Philip and Hubert Gatignon. 1994. “Specifying Competitive Effects in Diffusion Models: An Empirical Analysis”. International Journal of Research in Marketing 11(1): 17–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawakapan, Niti. 2000. “Trade and Traders: Local Becomes National”. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 31(2): 374–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pisano, Gary P. 1990. “The R&D Boundaries of the Firm: An Empirical Analysis”. Administrative Science Quarterly 35(3): 153–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putsis, William P., Sridhar Balasubramanian, Edward H. Kaplan, and Subrata K. Sen. 1997. “Mixing Behavior in Cross-Country Diffusion”. Marketing Science 16(4): 354–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan, Laureen and Sharon Tennyson. 1996. “Agent Discretion and the Choice of Insurance Marketing Systems”. Journal of Law and Economics 39: 637–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, Thomas S. 1971. Innovative Behavior and Communication. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, Thomas S. and Hubert Gatignon. 1986. “Competitive Effects on Technology Diffusion”. Journal of Marketing 50(3): 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, Thomas S and Hubert Gatignon. 1998. “Technology Development Mode: A Transaction Cost Conceptualization”. Strategic Management Journal 19(6): 515–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Everett M. 1983. Diffusion of Innovations: New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, S. Prakash. 1971. “Comparative Cluster Analysis for World Markets”. Journal of Marketing Research 8(3): 348–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sako, Mari and Susan Helper. 1998. “Determinants of Trust in Supplier Relations: Evidence From the Automotive Industry in Japan and the United States”. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 34(3): 387–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F. M. and David Ross. 1990. Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, 3rd edn. Dallas: TX: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmookler, Jacob. 1966. Invention and Economic Growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1943. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shankar, Venkatesh, Gregory S. Carpenter, and Lakshman Krishnamurthi. 1998. “Late Mover Advantage: How Innovative Late Entrants Outsell Pioneers”. Journal of Marketing Research 35(1): 54–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, A. Michael 1977. “Entry, Capacity, Investment and Oligopolistic Pricing”. Bell Journal of Economics 8(2): 534–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spulber, Daniel F. 1999. Market Microstructure: Intermediaries and the Theory of the Firm. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sultan, Fareena, John U. Farley, and Donald R. Lehmann. 1990. “A Meta-Analysis of Applications of Diffusion Models”. Journal of Marketing Research 27(1): 70–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapon, Francis. 1989. “A Transaction Costs Analysis of Innovations in the Organization of Pharmaceutical R&D”. Journal of Economic Behavior&Organization Oct 12(2): 197–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, David. 1996. “Firm Organization, Industrial Structure, and Technological Innovation”. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 31: 193–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, David J. 1992. “Competition, Cooperation, and Innovation”. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 18: 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terpstra, Vern and Chwo-Ming J. Yu. “Piggybacking: A Quick Road to Internatlisation1990”. International Marketing Review 7(4): 52–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban, Glen L., Theresa Carter, Steven Gaskin, and Zofia Mucha. 1984. “Market Share Rewards to Pioneering Brands: An Empirical Analysis and Strategic Implications”. Management Science 32(6): 645–659.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban, Glen L. and Eric Von Hippel. 1988. “Lead User Analyses for the Development of New Industrial Products”. Management Science 34(5): 569–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bulte, Christophe and Rudy K. Moenaert. 1998. “The Effects of R&D Team Co-location on Communication Patterns among R&D, Marketing, and Manufacturing”. Management Science 44(11): S1–S18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wathne, Kenneth H. and Jan B. Heide. 2000. “Opportunism in Interfirm Relationships: Forms, Outcomes, and Solutions”. Journal of Marketing 64(4): 36–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, Oliver E. 1979, “Assessing Vertical Market Restrictions”. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 127: 953–993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, Oliver E. 1996. The Mechanisms of Governance. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, Oliver E. 1999. “Strategy Research: Governance and Competence Perspectives”. Strategic Management Journal 20(3): 1087–1108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Erin Anderson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hubert Gatignon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Paris (Pantheon-Sorbonne), France

    Claude Menard

  2. The Ronald Coase Institute, Chevy Chase, MD, USA

    Mary M. Shirley

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Anderson, E., Gatignon, H. (2005). Firms and the Creation of New Markets. In: Menard, C., Shirley, M.M. (eds) Handbook of New Institutional Economics. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-25092-1_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation