Skip to main content

Schumpeter and the Micro-foundations of Endogenous Growth

  • Chapter
Book cover Essays in Honor of Edwin Mansfield

Abstract

This chapter traces the idea that technological change is endogenous to microeconomic roots considerably earlier than those emphasized in the “new” macroeconomic theories of economic growth. Building upon contributions by Richard Nelson, Jacob Schmookler, F.M. Scherer, and Yoram Barzel, it presents a lean model of how incentives for technological innovation arise endogenously from the interplay of changes in knowledge and demand. Paradoxes attributable to monopoly, parallel but independent technical initiatives, uncertainty, and the divergence between social and private benefits are resolved. A simulation analysis explores the implications of skew stochastic payoff distributions for the optimal number of R&D approaches.

This article was written for, and is reprinted with permission from, Horst Hanusch and Andreas Pykas, eds., The Elgar Companion on Neo-Schumpeterian Economics (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2005).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barzel, Y., 1968, ‘Optimal Timing of Innovations,’ Review of Economics and Statistics. 50, 348–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fellner, W.J., 1961, ‘Two Propositions in the Theory of Induced Innovations,’ Economic Journal, 71, 305–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golec, J. and M., Tamarkin, 1998, ‘Bettors Live Skewness, Not Risk, at the Horse Track,’ Journal of Political Economy, 106, 205–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J.R., 1932, The Theory of Wages. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitch, E.W., 1977, ‘The Nature and Function of the Patent System,’ Journal of Law & Economics, 20, 265–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield E. et al., 1977a, Research and Innovation in the Modern Corporation. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield E. et al, 1977b, ‘Social and Private Rates of Return from Industrial Innovations,’ Quarterly Journal of Economics, 91, 221–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.R., 1959, ‘The Economics of Invention: A Survey of the Literature,’ Journal of Business, 32, 101–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.R., 1961, ‘Uncertainty, Learning, and the Economics of Parallel Research and Development Projects,’ Review of Economics and Statistics, 43, 351–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, W.D., 1969, Invention, Growth, and Welfare: A Theoretical Treatment of Technological Change. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck, M.J. and Scherer, F. M. 1962, The Weapons Acquisition Process: An Economic Analysis. Boston: Harvard Business School Division of Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plant, A., 1934, ‘The Economic Theory Concerning Patents for Inventions,’ Economica, new series, 1, 30–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popp, D., 2002, ‘Induced Innovation and Energy Prices,’ American Economic Review, 92, 160–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P.M., 1994, ‘The Origins of Endogenous Growth.’ Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8, 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F.M., 1965, ‘Time-Cost Trade-offs in Uncertain Empirical Research Projects,’ Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 13, 71–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F.M., 1967, ‘Research and Development Resource Allocation under Rivalry,’ Quarterly Journal of Economics, 81, 359–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F.M., 1970, Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F.M., 1982, ‘Demand-Pull and Technological Innovation: Schmookler Revisited,’ Journal of Industrial Economics, 30, 225–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F.M., 2001, ‘The Innovation Lottery,’ in Rochelle Dreyfuss et al., (eds.), Expanding the Boundaries of Intellectual Property (New York: Oxford University Press), 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F.M. and Ross, D. 1990, Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. Third ed., Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F.M., D. Harhoff, and J. Kukies, 2000, ‘Uncertainty and the Size Distribution of Rewards from Innovation,’ Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 10, 175–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmookler, J., 1966, Invention and Economic Growth. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J.A., 1912, Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J.A., 1932, The Theory of Economic Development. Translated by Redvers Opie; Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J.A., 1942, Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thirtle, C. G. and Ruttan, V.W. 1987, The Role of Demand and Supply in the Generation and Diffusion of Technical Change. Chur: Harwood Academic Publishers

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Scherer Aetna, F. (2005). Schumpeter and the Micro-foundations of Endogenous Growth. In: Link, A.N., Scherer, F.M. (eds) Essays in Honor of Edwin Mansfield. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-25022-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics