5. Conclusion
In this chapter a number of uses of treatment data to support epidemiological research, analysis, and interpretation were reviewed. It is clear that treatment data alone or integrated with other sources of information can provide important insights into the epidemiology of drug abuse. The major contributions appear to be in estimating trends and comparing these across geographic or demographic groups. The utility of treatment data to accurately estimate prevalence is limited by the proportionately few persons who enter treatment.
Despite these limitations, much more can and should be done to better utilize the rich information from treatment data bases. The first is to reach consensus on key questions on usage patterns, institutional contact (e.g. jails, social service, health care, etc), and treatment program admission that will enable cross study comparison and the potential aggregation of data. The second approach requires a systematic investigation of the influences on treatment admissions, particularly the substance abuse patterns and the ecology of treatment services. With the accumulation of data over the past decades such investigation should be feasible. Finally, we need strong theoretical models and heuristic hypotheses to guide future analyses and interpretations involving treatment data. The increased use of treatment data in a sound framework should advance not only our scientific knowledge about drug use epidemiology, but also help guide policy and practice to better address the needs of the millions suffering from drug abuse and dependence.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Brodsky, M.D. (1985). History of heroin prevalence estimation techniques. In: Rouse, B.A., Kozel, N.J., and Richards, L.G. (Eds.), Self-Report Methods of Estimating Drug Use: Meeting Current Challenges to Validity, NIDA Research Monograph 57, NIDA, Rockville, MD., pp. 94–103.
Craddock, S.G., Rounds-Bryant, J.L., Flynn, P.M., and Hubbard, R.L. (1997). Characteristics and pretreatment behaviors of clients entering drug abuse treatment: 1969 to 1993. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 23(1), pp. 43–59.
Gardiner, K.L. and Shreckengost, R.C. (1985). Estimating heroin imports into the United States. In: Rouse, B.A., Kozel, N.J., and Richards, L.G. (Eds.), Self-Report Methods of Estimating Drug Use: Meeting Current Challenges to Validity, NIDA Research Monograph 57, NIDA, Rockville, MD., pp. 141–157.
Greenwood, J.A. (1971). Estimating the Number of Narcotic Addicts. US Department of Justice Document No. SCID-TR-3, GPO, Washington, DC.
Levin, G., Roberts, E.V., and Hirsch, G.B. (1975). The Persistent Poppy. Ballinger Publishing Co., Cambridge.
National Institute on Drug Abuse. (1980). Data from the Client Oriented Data Acquisition Process (CODAP), Series E, No. 18, State Statistics 1979, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville, MD.
National Institute on Drug Abuse. (1994). TheWashington, DC, Metropolitan Area Drug Study. Current Treatment Client Characteristics In TheWashington, DC, Metropolitan Area: 1991. National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville, MD.
National Institute on Drug Abuse. (1998). Assessing Drug Abuse Within and Across Communities: Community Epidemiology Surveillance Networks On Drug Abuse. National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville, MD.
National Institute on Drug Abuse. (1997). Epidemiologic Trends In Drug Abuse, Volumes I and II: Proceedings, Community Epidemiology Work Group. National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville, MD.
National Institute on Drug Abuse. (1996). Epidemiologic Trends in Drug Abuse, Volumes I and II: Proceedings, Community Epidemiology Work Group. National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville, MD.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (1995). Treatment Episode Data Set. SAMHSA, Rockville, MD.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2003). The DASIS Report (May 30, 2003). http://oas.samhsa.gov/2k3/multiYr/multiYr.htm.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2004). The DASIS Report (April 9, 2004). http://oas.samhsa.gov/2k4/dualTX/dualTX.htm.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2004). State Estimates of Substance Use From The 2002 NSDUH, Chap. 5 http://oas.samhsa.gov/2k2State/html/ch5.htm#5.4.
Treatment Episode Data Set, 2002. http://icpsr.umich.edu/SDA/SAMHDA/04022-001/CODEBOOK.
Woodward, J.A., Bonnett, D.G., and Brecht, M.L. (1985). Estimating the size of a heroin-abusing population using multiple-recapture census. In: Rouse, B.A., Kozel, N.J., and Richards, L.G. (Eds.), Self-Report Methods of Estimating Drug Use: Meeting Current Challenges to Validity, NIDA Research Monograph 57, NIDA, Rockville, MD., pp. 158–171.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer Science + Business Media, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hubbard, R.L. (2005). The Role of Treatment Data in Studying the Epidemiology of Substance Use and Abuse. In: Sloboda, Z. (eds) Epidemiology of Drug Abuse. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24416-6_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24416-6_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-24415-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-24416-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)