Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Complementarity of Species Distributions as a Tool for Prioritising Conservation Actions in Africa: Testing the Efficiency of Using Coarse-Scale Distribution Data

  • Conference paper
African Biodiversity

Abstract

Because of limited resources for conservation, and conflicts with other interests, systematic priority analysis is now a central task in conservation biology. Because of doubts about how efficient conservation schemes based on samples of biomes are for maintaining biodiversity, a major shift has taken place to use species distribution data compiled for large numbers of species. The spatial resolution of distribution data for regional or global analysis must necessarily be rather coarse, and it is therefore unclear whether identified priority areas will hold viable populations of all the species they are assumed to cover. We tested this using more finely resolved distribution data for forest birds of eastern Africa. The broad priority areas identified using coarse-scale data were corroborated using fine-scale data, and they appear to include suitable conservation sites for the majority of species. Exceptions to this were mainly in zones with few strictly forest-dependent species. Procedures for corrections and for moving on to identifying action sites within broader priority areas are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Araújo, M. B., and Williams, P. H., 2001, The bias of complementarity hotspots toward marginal populations, Conserv. Biol. 15:1710–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, N. and E., 2002, Important Bird Areas in Tanzania. WCST, Dar es Salaam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balmford, A., Leader-Williams, N., and Green, M. J. B., 1992, Protected areas of Afrotropical forest: history, status and prospects, in: Tropical Rain Forests: An Atlas for Conservation, Vol. 2, M. Collins and J.A. Sayer, eds., MacMillan, London, pp. 69–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balmford, A., Moore, J. L., Brooks, T., Burgess, N., Hansen, L. A., Williams, P., and Rahbek, C., 2001, Conservation conflicts across Africa, Science 291:2616–2619.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, C. D., 1999, Protecting a Garúa forest in Ecuador: the role of institutions and ecosystem valuation, Ambio 28:156–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennun, L., Dranzoa, C., and Pomeroy, D., 1996, The forest birds of Kenya and Uganda, J. East Afr. Nat. Hist. 85:23–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beresford, P. (in press) Toward a phylogenetic biogeography of the Guineo-Congolian biome: molecular systematics of Bleda and Criniger (Aves: Pycnonotidae), Mol. Phyl. Evol.

    Google Scholar 

  • BirdLife International, 2000, Threatened birds of the world, Lynx Edicions and BirdLife, Balcelona and Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boittani, L., Corsi, F., de Biase, A., Carranza, I. D., Ravagli, M., Reggiani, G., Sinibaldi, I., and Trapanese, P., 1999, A Databank for the Conservation and Management of the African Mammals. Inst. Ecol. Appl., Roma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowie, R. C. K., 2003, Birds, molecules, and evolutionary patterns among Africa’s islands in the sky. Ph.D. thesis, Percy FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, University of Cape Town.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowie, R. C. K., Fjeldså, J., Hackett, S. J. & Crowe, T. M., 2004, Systematics and biogeography of the double-collared sunbirds (Nectariniidae) of the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania, Auk 121:660–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Branch, W. R., Benn, G. A. & Lombard, A. T. 1995, The tortoises (Testudinidae) and terrapins (Pelomedusidae) of southern Africa: their diversity, distribution and conservation, S. Afr. J. Zool. 30:91–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brito, J. C., Crespo, E. G., and Paulo, O. S., 1999, Modelling wildlife distributions: Logistic multiple regression vs overlap analysis, Ecography 22:251–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broadley, D. G., and Cotterill, F. P. D., 2004, The reptiles of southeast Katanga, an overlooked ‘hot spot’, African J. Herpetol. 53:35–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, T., Balmford, A., Burgess, N., Fjeldså, J., Hansen, L. A., Moore, J., Rahbek, C., and Williams, P. H., 2001, Toward a blueprint for conservation in Africa, BioScience 51:613–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, D., Nielsen, D., and Tangley, L., 1997, The last frontier forests: ecosystems and economics on the edge, World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, N. D., Nummelin, M, Fjeldså, J., Howell, K. M., Lukumbyzya, K., Mhando, L., Phillipson, P., Vanden Berghe, E., and Depew, L. A. (eds), 1998, Biodiversity and Conservation of the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania and Kenya, J. East Afr. Nat. Hist. 87:1–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, N. D., Rahbek, C., Larsen, F. W., Williams, P., and Balmford, A., 2002, How much of the vertebrate diversity of sub-Saharan Africa is catered for by recent conservation proposals? Biol. Conserv. 107:327–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, N. D., and Clarke, G. P. (eds.) 2000, The coastal forests of Eastern Africa, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, N. D., Rahbek, C., Williams, P., and Balmford, A., 2002, How much of the vertebrate diversity of sub-Saharan Africa is catered for by recent conservation proposals, Biol. Conserv. 107:327–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, N., Küper, W., Mutke, J., Brown, J., Westaway, S., Turpie, S., Meschack, C., Taplin, J., McClean, C., and Lovett, J. C., 2004, Major gaps in the distribution of protected areas for threatened and narrow range Afrotropical plants, Biodiver. Conserv. In press

    Google Scholar 

  • Carswell, M., Pomeroy, D., Reynolds, J., and Tushabe, H., in press, The Bird Atlas of Uganda, BTO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, D. E., Gouch, S., Vickery, J. A., Firbank, L. G., Petit, S., Pywell, R., and Bradbury, R. B., 2004, Rule-based predictive models are not cost-effective alternatives to bird monitoring in farmland, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 101:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordeiro, N. J., 1998, Preliminary analysis of the nestedness patterns of montane forest birds in the Eastern Arc Mountains, J. East Afr. Nat. Hist. 87:101–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Klerk, H. M., Crowe, T. M., Fjeldså, J., and Burgess, N. D., 2002a, Biogeographical patterns of endemic terrestrial Afrotropical birds, Divers. Distr. 8:147–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Klerk, H. M., Crowe, T. M., Fjeldså, J., and Burgess, N. D., 2002b, Patterns of species richness and narrow endemism of terrestrial bird species in the Afrotropical Region, J. Zool. Lond. 256:327–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fa, J. E., Burn, R. W., Stanley Price, M. R., and Underwood, F. M., 2004, Identifying important endemic areas using ecoregions: birds and mammals in the Indo-Pacific, Oryx 38:91–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faith, D. P., and Walker, P. A., 1996, Environmental diversity: on the best-possible use of surrogate data for assessing the relative biodiversity of sets of areas, Biodiv. Conserv. 5:399–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishpool, L. D. C., and Evans, M. I., 2001, Important Bird Areas in Africa and Associated Islands. Priority Sites for Conservation, BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fjeldså, J., Lambin, E., and Mertens, B., 1999, The relationship of species richness and endemism to ecoclimatic stability-a case study comparing distributions of Andean birds with remotely sensed environmental data, Ecography 22:63–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fjeldså, J., 2001, Cartografiar la avifauna Andina: una base cientÍfica para establecer prioridades de conservación, in: Bosques nublados del neotrópico, M. Kapelle and A. D. Brown, eds, INBIO, Costa Rica, pp. 125–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fjeldså, J., 2003, Patterns of endemism in African birds: how much does taxonomy matter? Ostrich 74:30–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fjeldså, J., and Lovett, J. C., 1997, Geographical patterns of old and young species in African forest biota: the significance of specific montane areas as evolutionary centers, Biodiver. Conserv. 6:325–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fjeldså, J., Álvarez, M. D., Lazcano, J. M., and Leon, B., in press, Illicit crops and armed conflict as constraints on biodiversity conservation in the Andes Region, Ambio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, P., 2001, The potential negative impacts of global climate change on tropical montane cloud forest, Earth-Sci. Rev. 55:73–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friis, I., and Ryding, O., 2001, Biodiversity research in the Horn of Africa Region, Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters, Biol., Vol. 54.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICBP, 1992, Putting Biodiversity on the Map: Priority Areas for Global Conservation, ICBP, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imbeau, L., Drapeau, P., and Mönkönen, M., 2003, Are forest birds categorized as “edge species” strictly associated with edges? Ecography 26:514–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IUCN, 1993, Parks for Life: Report of the IVth World Congress on National Parks and Protected Areas. IUCN, Gland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansson, R., and Dynesius, M., 2002, The fate of clades in a world of recurrent climatic change: Milankovitch oscillations and evolution, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33:741–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jetz, W., and Rahbek, C., 2002, Geographic range size and determinants of avian species richness, Science 297:1548–1551.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jetz, W., Rahbek, C. and Colwell, R. K., 2004, The coincidence of rarity and richness and the potential signature of history in centers of endemism, Ecology Letters in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, L., 2001, Ten Million Trees Later, GTZ, Eschborn, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, F. W., and Rahbek, C., 2003, Influence of scale on conservation priority setting — a test on African mammals, Biodiver. Conserv. 12:599–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leader-Williams, N., and Dublin, H.T., 2000, Charismatic megafauna as ‘flagship species’, in: Priorities for conservation of mammalian biodiversity: has the panda had its day? A. Entwistle and N. Dunstone, eds., Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 53–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, A., and Pomeroy, D., 1989, A Bird Atlas of Kenya, Balkema, Rotterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loiselle, B. A., Lowell, C. A., Graham, C. H., Goerck, J. M., Brooks, T. M., Smith, K. G., and Williams, P. H., 2003, Avoiding pitfalls of using species distribution models in conservation planning, Conserv. Biol. 14:1591–1600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovett, J. C., Rudd, S., Taplin, J., and Frimodt-Møller, C., 2000, Patterns of plant diversity in Africa south of the Sahara and their implications for conservation management, Biodiver. Conserv. 9:33–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, J. and MacKinnon, K., 1986, Review of the Protected Area System in the Afrotropical Realm, IUCN, Gland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddock, A., and du Plessis, M. A., 1999, Can species data only be appropriately used to conserve biodiversity? Biodiver. Conserv. 8:603–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margules, C. R., and Pressey, R. L., 2000, Systematic conservation planning, Nature 405:243–253.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. L., Balmford, A., Brooks, T., Burgess, N. D., Hansen, L. A., Rahbek, C., and Williams, P. H., 2003, Performance of sub-Saharan vertebrates as indicator groups for identifying priority areas for conservation, Conserv. Biol. 17:207–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittermeier, R. A., Myers, N., Thomsen, J. B., and da Fonseca, G. A., 1998, Biodiversity hotspots and major tropical wilderness areas: approaches to setting conservation priorities, Conserv. Biol. 12:516–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittermeier, R. A., Myers, N., Gil, P. R., and Mittermeier, C. G., 2000, Hotspot; the Earth’s Biologically Richest and Most Endangered Terrestrial Ecoregions. CEMEX and Conservation International, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. L., Folkmann, M., Balmford, A., Brooks, T., Burgess, N., Rahbek, C., Williams, P.H., and Krarup, J., 2003, Heuristic and optimal solutions for set-covering problems in conservation biology, Ecography 26:595–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, A. O., 1998, Integrating population abundance, dynamics and distribution into broad-scale priority setting, in: Conservation in a Changing World, G. M. Mace, A Balmford, J. Ginsberg, eds., Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 251–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. M., Dinerstein, E., Wikramanayake, E. D., Burgess, N. D., Powell, G. V. N., Underwood, E. C., D’Amico, J. A., Itoua, I., Strand, H. E., Morrison, J. C., Loucks, C. J., Allnutt, T. F., Ricketts, T. H., Kura, Y., Lamoreux, J. F., Wettangel, W. W., Hedao, P., and Kassem, K. R., 2001, Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on Earth, BioScience 51:933–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plumptre, A. J., Behangana, M., Davenport, T. R. B., Kahindo, C., Kityo, R., Endomba, R., Nkuutu, D., Ssegawa, P., and Eilu, G., 2003, The Biodiversity of the Albertine Rift, Wildlife Conservation Society, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahbek, C. and Graves, C. R., 2001, Multiscale assessment of patterns of avian species richness, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 98:4534–4539.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raxworthy, C. J., Martinez-Meyer, E., Horning, N., Nussbaum, R. A., Schneider, G. E., Ortega-Huerta, M. A., and Peterson, A. T., 2003, Predicting distributions of known and unknown reptile species in Madagascar, Nature 426:837–841.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues, A. S., Cerdeira, J. O., and Gaston, K. J., 2000, Flexibility, efficiency, and accountability: adapting reserve selection algorithms to more complex conservation problems, Ecography 23:565–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues, A. S. L., Tratt, R, Wheeler, B. D, and Gaston, K. J., 1999, The performance of existing networks of conservation areas in representing biodiversity, Proc. Roy. Soc. London Ser. B-Biol.Sci. 266:1453–1460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rondinini, C., Stuart, S., and Boitani, L. (in press) Habitat suitability models reveal shortfall in conservation planning: the case of African vertebrates, Conserv. Biol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, M. S., Arctander, P., and Fjeldså, J., 1998, Speciation and taxonomy of montane greenbuls of the genus Andropadus (Aves: Pycnonotidae), Steenstrupia 24:51–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, S., 2002, Biogeographic crossroads as priority areas for biodiversity conservation, Conserv. Biol. 16:1480–1487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tushabe, H., Reynolds, J., and Pomeroy, D., 2001, Innovative aspects of the Bird Atlas of Uganda, Ostrich suppl. 15:183–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Geological Survey, 2000, Global Land Cover Characterisation. Available at http://edcdaac.usgs.gov/glcc/glcc.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P. H,. 1996, Worldmap 4 windows: software and help document 4. London: distributed privately.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P. H., 1998, Key sites for conservation: area-selection methods for biodiversity, in: Conservation in a Changing World, G. M. Mace, A Balmford, J. Ginsberg, eds., Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 211–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P. H., 2001, Complementarity, in: Encyclopedia of Biodiversity, S. A. Levin, ed., Vol. 1, Academic Press, pp. 813–829.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P. H., Gibbon, D. Margules, C., Rebelo, A., Humphries, C., and Pressey, R., 1996, A comparison of richness hotspots, rarity hotspots and complementarity areas for conserving the diversity of British Birds, Conserv. Biol. 10:155–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P. H., de Klerk, H. M., and Crowe, T. M., 1999, Interpreting biogeographical boundaries among Afrotropical birds: distinguishing spatial patterns in richness gradients and species replacement, J. Biogeog. 26:459–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P. H., Moore, J. L., Kamden Toham, A., Brooks, T. M., Strand, H., A’Amico, J., Wisz, M., Burgess, N. D., Balmford, A., and Rahbek, C., 2003, Integrating biodiversity priorities with conflicting socio-economic values in the Guinean-Congolian forest region, Biodiver. Conserv. 12:1297–1320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WWF and IUCN, 1994, Centers of Plant Diversity: a Guide and Strategy for their Conservation. Vol.1. Europe, Africa, SW Asia and the Middle East, IUCN Publications Unit, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Zoological Museum, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Jon Fjeldså

  2. Makerere University Institute of Environment and Natural Resources, P.O. Box 7298, Kampala, Uganda

    Herbert Tushabe

Authors
  1. Jon Fjeldså
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Herbert Tushabe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fjeldså, J., Tushabe, H. (2005). Complementarity of Species Distributions as a Tool for Prioritising Conservation Actions in Africa: Testing the Efficiency of Using Coarse-Scale Distribution Data. In: African Biodiversity. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24320-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation