Abstract
I owe much of my understanding of the difference between synthetic and analytic thinking in mathematics to my reading of Michael Otte’s papers and the conversations we had with him within the BACOMET group. One of the first sources of inspiration for me has been his work on arithmetic and geometric thinking. In the paper I shall outline the consequences of the distinction for analyzing processes of mathematics teaching and learning in my own research. 1 shall further use this distinction to look critically upon the recent trend in mathematics education of considering mathematics as a kind of “discursive practice.”
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Brousseau, G. (1996). L’enseignant dans la théorie des situations didactiques. In R. Noirfalise, & M.-J. Perrin-Glorian (Eds.), Actes de la Huitième Ecole d’été de Didactique des Mathématiques (Saint-Sauve d’Auvergne, 22 — 31 août 1995). Clermont-Ferrand: IREM, 3–46.
Chevallard, Y. (1999). L’analyse des pratiques enseignantes en théorie anthropologique du didactique. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques 19.2, 221–266.
Otte, M. (1990a). Arithmetic and geometry: Some remarks on the concept of complementarity. Studies in Philosophy and Education 10, 37–62.
Otte, M. (1990b). Intuition and formalism in mathematical proof. Interchange 21.1, 59–64.
Sierpinska, A. (1996). The diachronic dimension in research on understanding in mathematics — usefulness and limitations of the concept of epistemological obstacle. In H. N. Jahnke, N. Knoche, M. Otte (Eds.), History of Mathematics and Education: Ideas and Experiences. Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht, 289–318.
Sierpinska, A., Defence, A., Khatcherian, T., Saldanha, L. (1997). A propos de trois modes de raisonnement en algèbre linéaire. In J.-L. Dorier (Ed.), L’Enseignetnent de l’Algèbre Linéaire en Question. Grenoble: La Pensée Sauvage éditions, 249–268.
Sierpinska, A., Nnadozie, A. A. & Oktaç, A. (2002). A Study of Relationships between Theoretical Thinking and High Achievement in Linear Algebra. Concordia University: Manuscript.
Sierpinska, A., Nnadozie, A. A. (2001). Methodological problems in analyzing data from a small scale study on theoretical thinking in high achieving linear algebra students. Proceedings of the 25th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education 4. Utrecht, 177–184.
Sierpinska, A. (2000). On some aspects of students’ thinking in linear algebra. In J.-L. Dorier (Ed.), On the Teaching of Linear Algebra. Dortrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 209–246.
Steinbring, H. (1991). The concept of chance in everyday teaching: Aspects of a social epistemology of mathematical knowledge. Educational Studies in Mathematics 22, 503–522.
Steinbring, H. (1993). Problem in the development of mathematical knowledge in the classroom: the case of a calculus lesson. For the Learning of Mathematics 13.3, 37–50.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky 1. Problems of General Psychology, including the volume Thinking and Speech. New York and London: Plenum Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sierpinska, A. (2005). On Practical and Theoretical Thinking and Other False Dichotomies in Mathematics Education. In: Hoffmann, M.H., Lenhard, J., Seeger, F. (eds) Activity and Sign. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24270-8_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24270-8_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-24269-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-24270-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)