Skip to main content

When Does an Incentive for Free Riding Promote Rational Bidding?

  • Conference paper

Abstract

Economics has focused on models of individual rational agents. But many important decisions are made by small groups such as families, management teams, boards of directors, central bank boards, juries, appellate courts, and committees of various types. For example, bid amounts in common value auctions such as the Outer Continental Shelf oil lease auction are typically decided by committees. Previous experimental research with natural groups has found that group bidders are significantly less rational than individual bidders in how they use information in common value auctions. Experiments reported here involve cooperative and non-cooperative nominal groups. The unequal profit-sharing rule applied to non-cooperative nominal groups creates an incentive to free ride within the bidding groups. This incentive to free ride tends to offset the winner’s curse and promote rational bidding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Capen, E., Clapp, R. & Campbell, W. (1971). “Competitive Bidding in High-Risk Situations,” Journal of Petroleum Technology, 641–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, J. & Hayne, S. (2002), “Barking Up the Right Tree: Are Small Groups Rational Agents?”, The Behavioral Economics Conference, Great Barrington, MA, July 19–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, D. & Kagel, J. H. (1996). “Bidding in Common Value Auctions: How the Commercial Construction Industry Corrects for the Winner's Curse,” Management Science, 42(10):1463–1475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, E., Marsden, J. & Saidi, R. (1991). “Are Joint Bidding and Competitive Common Value Auctions Markets Compatible — Some Evidence from Offshore Oil Auctions,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 20: 99–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kagel, J. & Levin, D. (1986). “The Winner's Curse and Public Information in Common Value Auctions,” American Economic Review, 76(5): 894–920.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagel, J., Levin, D., Battalio, R. & Meyer, D. (1989). “First-Price Common Value Auctions: Bidder Behavior and the ‘Winner's Curse',” Economic Inquiry, 27: 241–248.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cox, J.C., Hayne, S.C. (2005). When Does an Incentive for Free Riding Promote Rational Bidding?. In: Rapoport, A., Zwick, R. (eds) Experimental Business Research. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24243-0_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics