Skip to main content

Multicomponent Efficiency Measurement in Banking

  • Chapter
  • 1351 Accesses

6.6. Conclusions

This chapter has examined model structures for dealing with multi-component efficiency measurement in a banking environment. The conventional DEA approach, as applied in bank related studies, has tended to concentrate on a single measure of performance for the DMU. Very often, however, there are multiple components or sub units within the DMU whose individual performance is required. The model provided herein provides a mechanism for developing multi-component measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Banker, R.D., A. Charnes and W.W. Cooper (1984), Some models for technical and scale efficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis, Management Science 30, 1078–1092.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beasley, J.E. (1995), Determining teaching and research efficiencies, Journal of the Operational Research Society 46, 441–52.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Beasley, J.E. and Y.-H. B. Wong (1990), Restricting weight flexibility in data envelopment analysis, Journal of the Operational Research Society 41, 829–835.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper and E.L. Rhodes (1978), Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European Journal of Operational Research 2, 429–44.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper and Z.M. Huang and D.B. Sun (1990), Polyhedral cone-ratio DEA models with an illustrative application to large commercial banks, Journal of Econometrics 46, 73–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper and E.L. Rhodes (1978), Measuring the efficiency of Decision Making Units, European Journal of Operational Research 2, 429–444.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Cook, W.D., and M. Hababou (2001), Sales performance measurement in bank branches, OMEGA 29, 299–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cook, W.D., M. Hababou and H. Tuenter (2000), Multicomponent efficiency measurement and shared inputs in data envelopment analysis: An application to sales and service performance in bank branches, Journal of Productivity Analysis 14, 209–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cooper, W., K. Park and J. Pastor (1999), RAM: A range adjusted measure of inefficiency for use with additive models, and relations to other models and measures in DEA, Journal of Productivity Analysis 11, 5–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fare, R., C.A.K. Lovell (1978), Measuring the technical efficiency of production, Journal of Economic Theory 19, 150–62.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Fare, R. And S. Grosskopf (1996), Productivity and intermediate products: a frontier approach, Economic Letters 50, 65–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fare, R., and D. Primont (1984), Efficiency measures for multiplant firms, Operations Research Letters 3, 257–260.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Oral, M. And R. Yolalan (1990), An empirical study on measuring operational efficiency and profitability of bank branches, European Journal of Operational Research 46, 282–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Schaffnit, C, D. Rosen and J.C. Paradi (1997), Best practice analysis of bank branches: an application of data envelopment analysis in a large Canadian bank, European Journal of Operational Research, 98, 269–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sherman, H.D. and F. Gold (1985), Bank branch operating efficiency: evaluation with Data Envelopment Analysis, Journal of Banking and Finance 9, 297–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sherman, H.D., and G. Ladino (1995), Managing bank productivity using data envelopment analysis (DEA), Interfaces 25, 60–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Thompson, R.G., L.N. Langemeier and C.T. Lee and E. Lee and R.M. Thrall (1990), The role of multiplier bounds in efficiency analysis with application to Kansas farming, Journal of Econometrics 46, 93–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Thrall, R.M. (1996), The lack of invariance of optimal dual solutions under translations, Annals of Operations Research 66, 103–8.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Zieshang, K. (1984), An extended Farrell efficiency measure, Journal of Economic Theory 33:387–96.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2005). Multicomponent Efficiency Measurement in Banking. In: Modeling Performance Measurement. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24138-8_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics