Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Modeling Performance Measurement pp 225–254Cite as

Resource Constrained DEA

  • Chapter

  • 1348 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Athanassopoulos, A.D. and J.E. Storbeck (1995), Non-parametric models for spatial efficiency, Journal of Productivity Analysis 6, 225–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Balakrishnan, A., A. Desai, and J.E. Storbeck (1990), Efficiency evaluation of retail outlet networks, Environment and Planning B 15, 131–141.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Banker, R.D., A. Charnes and W.W. Cooper (1984), Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis, Management Science 30, 1078–1092.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bunch, D.S., D. Cardús, M.J. Fuhrer and R.M. Thrall (1989), When are additive models valid for evaluating proposed research, 28, 168–177.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Calvo, A. and D. Marks (1973), Location of health care facilities: An analytic approach. Journal of Socio Economic Planning Sciences 7, 407–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper, B. Golany, L.M. Seiford, and J. Stutz (1985), Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions. Journal of Econometrics 30, 91–107.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper and E. Rhodes (1978), Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European Journal of Operational Research 2, 429–444.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper and R.M. Thrall (1991), A structure for classifying and characterizing efficiencies and inefficiencies in DEA, Journal of Productivity Analysis 2, 191–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cook, W.D., and R. Green (2000), Project prioritization: A resource constrained data envelopment analysis approach, Journal of Socio Economic Planning Sciences 34, 85–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cook, W.D., and R.H. Green (2003), Selecting sites for new facilities using data envelopment analysis, Journal of Productivity Analysis 19, 77–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Desai, A. and J.E. Storbeck (1990), Characterization of the constraints in successively-inclusive location hierarchies, Environment and Planning B 15, 131–141.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Eaton, D.J., R. Church, V. Bennett, B. Harmon, and L. Lopez (1982), On deployment of health resources in rural Valle de Cauca, Colombia. Planning Processes in Developing Countries: Techniques and Achievements, 17:331–359. Editors W.D. Cook and T.E. Kuhn.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fisher, H., and G. Rushton (1979), Spatial efficiency of service locations and the regional development process, Papers of the Regional Science Association, 42:83–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Grosskopf, S. (1986), The role of reference technology in measuring productive efficiency, Economic Journal 96, 499–513.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Halmos, P.R. (1960), Naïve Set Theory, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Head, J.A. (1959), Predicting traffic accidents for highway elements on urban extensions of state highways, Highway Research Board Bulletin, 208, 45–63, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kao, C. (1998), Measuring the efficiency of forest districts with multiple working circles, Journal of the Operational Research Society 49, 583–590.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Maindiratta, A. (1990), Largest size-efficient scale and size efficiencies in data envelopment analysis, Journal of Econometrics 46, 57–72.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Martino, J.P. (1995), R&D Project Selection, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Oral, M., O. Kettani and P. Lang (1991), A methodology for collective evaluation and selection of industrial R&D projects, Management Science 37, 871–883.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Persaud, B.N., A. Kazakov and W. Cook (1992), Safety Expenditure and Achievable Benefits, MTO Report ECN-92-01, Research and Development Branch, Ministry of Transportation of Ontario, Toronto, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Savas, E. (1969), Simulation and cost-effectiveness analysis of New York’s emergency ambulance service, Management Science 15, 608–627.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Thompson, R.G., F.D. Singleton Jr., R.M. Thrall and B.A. Smith (1986), Comparative site evaluations for locating a high-energy physics lab in Texas, Interfaces 16, 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Troxel, I. (1993), Severity models for roadside objects, Transportation Research Circular 416, Transportation Research Board/National Research Council, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2005). Resource Constrained DEA. In: Modeling Performance Measurement. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24138-8_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation