Abstract
In the last four decades, the United States has witnessed revolutionary changes in the organization of family life and gender relations. A large number of sociological observers of American religion in recent years have argued that religious institutions in the United States must accommodate themselves to the “changing family” by reaching out to and symbolically affirming persons in a range of nontraditional families: unmarried singles, stepfamilies, single mothers, dual-career families, and gays and lesbians (D’Antonio & Aldous, 1983; Edgell, 2005; Marler, 1995; Roof & Gesch, 1995). Pointing to marked changes in the organization of family and work, from rising rates of female labor force participation to the increasingly pluralistic character of American family life, these scholars argue that religious institutions must change their family-related discourse and practice to accommodate the family and gender revolutions of the last four decades if they seek to flourish in the 21st century.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abbasi-Shavazi, M. J. (2001, November). Fertility revolution in Iran. Population & Société, INED, 373, 1–4.
Alwin, D. F. (1986). Religion and parental child-rearing orientations: Evidence of a Catholic-Protestant convergence. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 412–40.
Amato, P. R., & Booth, A. (1997). A generation at risk: Growing up in an era of family upheaval. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Ammerman, N. T. (1997a). Golden rule Christianity: Lived religion in the American mainstream. In D. Hall (Ed.), Lived religion in America: Toward a history of practice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Ammerman, N. T. (1997b). Congregation & community. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Ammerman, N. T. & Roof, W. C. (1995). Introduction: Old patterns, new trends, fragile experiments. In N. Ammerman & W. C. Roof (Ed.), Work, family, and religion in contemporary society. New York: Routledge.
Argue, A., Johnson, D. R., & White, L. K. (1999). Age and religiosity: Evidence from a three-wave panel analysis. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 38, 423–435.
Bartkowski, J. P. (2001). Remaking the godly marriage: Gender negotiation in evangelical families. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Bartkowski, J. P., & Wilcox, W. B. (2000). Conservative protestant child discipline: The case of parental yelling. Social Forces, 79, 265–290.
Bartkowski, J. P., & Xu, X. (2000). Distant patriarchs or expressive dads? The discourse and practice of fathering in conservative protestant families. Sociological Quarterly, 41, 465–485.
Baumrind, D. (1971). Current patterns of parental authority. Development Psychology Monograph, 4, 1–103.
Becker, P. E., & Hofmeister, H. (2001). Work, family, and religious involvement for men and women. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 40, 707–722.
Berger, P. (1967). Religious institutions. In N. J. Smelser (Ed.), Sociology: An introduction (pp. 329–379). New York: John Wiley.
Booth, A., Johnson, D. R., Branaman, A., & Sica, A. (1995). Belief and behavior: Does religion matter in today’s marriage? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 661–671.
Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Browning, D. S. (2003). Marriage and modernization: How globalization threatens marriage and what to do about it. Wm. B. Eerdmans.
Browning, D. S., Miller-McLemore, B. J., Couture, P. D., Lyon, K. B., & Franklin, R. M. (1997). From culture wars to common ground: Religion and the American family debate. Louisville, KY: John Knox Press.
Bumpass, L. L. (1990). What happening to the family? Interactions between demographic and institutional change. Demography, 27, 483–498.
Bumpass, L. L. (2001). Family-related attitudes, couple relationships, and union stability. In R. Lesthaeghe (Ed.), Meaning and choice: Value orientations and life cycle decisions. Hague, Netherlands: Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute.
Bumpass, L. L., & Sweet, J. A. (1995). Cohabitation, marriage, and union stability. Madison, WI: Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Call, V. R. A., & Heaton, T. B. (1997). Religious influence on marital stability. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 36, 382–392.
Cammack, M., Young, L. A., & Heaton, T. B. (1997). An empirical assessment of divorce law in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal for Islamic Studies, 4, 93–108.
Casanova, J. (1994). Public religion in the modern world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Chaves, M. (1991). Family structure and protestant church attendance: The sociological basis of cohort and age effects. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 39, 329–340.
Chaves, M. (1997). Ordaining women: Culture and conflict in religious organizations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Christiano, K. J. (2000). Religion and family in modern American culture. In S. K. Houseknecht & J. G. Pankhurst (Eds.), Family, religion, and social change in diverse societies. New York: Oxford University Press.
Clydesdale, T. (1997). Family behaviors among early U.S. baby boomers: Exploring the effects of religion and income change, 1965–1982. Social Forces, 76, 605–635.
Coltrane, S. (2001). Marketing the marriage “solution”: Misplaced simplicity in the politics of fatherhood. Sociological Perspectives, 44, 387–418.
Coontz, S. (1992). The way we never were: American families and the nostalgia trap. New York: Basic Books.
Davidman, L. (1991). Tradition in a rootless world. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Dollahite, D. C. (Ed.). (2000). Strengthening our families: An in-depth look at the proclamation on the family. Salt Lake City: Bookcraft.
Dollahite, D. C. (2003). Fathering for eternity: Generative spirituality in latter-day saint fathers of children with special needs. Review of Religious Research, 44, 339–351.
Dollahite, D. C., Marks, L. D., & Goodman, M. (2004). Families and religious beliefs, practices, and communities: Linkages in a diverse and dynamic cultural context. In M. J. Coleman & L. H. Ganong (Eds.), The handbook of contemporary families: Considering the past, contemplating the future. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Durkheim, E. (1951). Suicide. New York: Free Press. (Original work published 1897)
D’Antonio, W., & Aldous, J. (1983). Families and religions: Conflict and change in modern society. Bevery Hills: Sage.
Edgell, P. (2003). In rhetoric and practice: Defining “the good family” in local congregations. In M. Dillon (Ed.), The handbook of the sociology of religion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Edgell, P. (2005). Religion and family: Understanding the transformation of linked institutions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Eggebeen, D., & Knoester, C. (2001). Does fatherhood matter for men? Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 381–393.
Elder, G. H., Jr., & Conger, R. D. (2000). Children of the land: Adversity and success in rural America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ellison, C. G. (1991). Religious involvement and subjective well-being. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 32, 80–99.
Ellison, C. G. (1994). Religion, the life stress paradigm, and the study of depression. In J. S. Levin (Ed.), Religion in aging and health: Theoretical foundations and methodological frontiers. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Ellison, C. G., & Bartkowski, J. P. (2002). Conservative protestantism and the division of household labor among married couples. Journal of Family Issues, 23, 950–985.
Ellison, C. G., Bartkowski, J. P., & Anderson, K. L. (1999). Are there religious variations in domestic violence? Journal of Family Issues, 20, 87–113.
Ellison, C. G., Bartkowski, J. P., & Segal, M. L. (1996). Conservative protestantism and the parental use of corporal punishment. Social Forces, 74, 1003–1029.
Ellison, C. G., & Sherkat, D. E. (1993a). Conservative protestantism and support for corporal punishment. American Sociological Review, 58, 131–44.
Ellison, C. G., & Sherkat, D. E. (1993b). Obedience and autonomy: Religion and parental values reconsidered. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 32, 313–329.
Furstenberg, F. (1988). Good dads/bad dads: The two faces of fatherhood. In A. Cherlin (Ed.), Changing American family and public policy. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
Gallagher, S. K. (2003). Evangelical identity and gendered family life. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Gesch, L. (1995). Responses to changing lifestyles: “Feminists” and “traditionalists” in mainstream religion. In N. T. Ammerman & W. C. Roof (Eds.), Work, family, and religion in contemporary society. New York: Routledge.
Goldscheider, F. K., & Waite, L. J. (1993). New families, no families?: The transformation of the American home. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Goode, W. J. (1993). World changes in divorce patterns. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Gottman, J. M. (1998). Toward a process model of men in marriages and families. In A. Booth & A. Crouter (Eds.), Men in families: When do they get involved? What difference does it make?. Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum.
Griffith, R. M. (1997). God’s daughters: Evangelical women and the power of submission. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Heaton, T. B. (1984). Religious homogamy and marital satisfaction reconsidered. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 46, 729–733.
Heaton, T. B., & Pratt, E. L. (1990). The effects of religious homogamy on marital satisfaction and stability. Journal of Family Issues, 11, 191–207.
Hertel, B. R. (1995). Work, family and faith: Recent trends. In N. Ammerman & W. C. Roof (Eds.), Work, family, and religion in contemporary society (pp. 81–121). New York: Routledge.
Hofferth, S. 2003. Race/ethnic differences in father involvement in two-parent families: Culture, context, or economy. Journal of Family Issues, 24, 185–216.
Houseknecht, S. K., & Pankhurst, J. G. (2000). Family, religion, and social change in diverse societies. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hout, M., Greeley, A., & Wilde, M. J. (2001). The demographic imperative in religious change in the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 468–500.
Kurtz, S. (1992). All the mothers are one. New York: Columbia University Press.
Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T., & Michaels, S. (1994). The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lawton, L., & Bures, R. (2001). Parental divorce and the “switching” of religious identity. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 40, 99–111.
Lesthaeghe, R. (1995). The second demographic transition in western countries: An interpretation. In K. O. Mason & A.-M. Jensen (Eds.), Gender and family change in industrialized countries. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Mahoney, A., Pargament, K. I., Tarakeshwar, N., & Swank, A. B. (2001). Religion in the home in the 1980s and 1990s: A meta-analytic review and conceptual analysis of links between religion, marriage, and parenting. Journal of Family Psychology, 15, 559–596.
Marks, L. D., & Dollahite, D. C. (2001). Religion, relationships, and responsible fathering in latter-day saint families of children with special needs. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18, 625–650.
Marler, P. L. (1995). Lost in the fifties: The changing family and the nostalgic church. In N. T. Ammerman and W. C. Roof (Eds.), Work, family, and religion in contemporary society. New York: Routledge.
Marquardt, E. (2004). The spiritual lives of children of divorce. New York: The Institute for American Values.
Marsiglio, W., & Pleck, J. (in press). Fatherhood and masculinities. In R. W. Connell, J. Hearn, & M. Kimmel (Eds.), The handbook of studies on men and masculinities. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
McLanahan, S., & Sandefur, G. (1994). Growing up with a single parent: What hurts, what helps. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Miller, A., & Stark, R. (2002). Gender and religiousness: Can socialization explanations be saved? American Journal of Sociology, 107, 1399–1423.
Myers, S. M. (1996). An interactive model of religiosity inheritance: The importance of family context. American Sociological Review, 61, 858–866.
Nason-Clark, N. (1997). The battered wife: How Christians confront family violence. Louisville, KY: Westminster/John Knox Press.
Niebuhr, H. R. (1929). The social sources of denominationalism. New York: Holt.
Nock, S. (1998). Marriage in men’s lives. New York: Oxford University Press.
Palkovitz, R. (2002). Involved fathering and men’s adult development: Provisional balances. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Pankhurst, J. G., & Houseknecht, S. K. (2000). Introduction: The religion-family linkage and social change-A neglected area of study. In S. K. Houseknecht & J. G. Pankhurst (Eds.), Family, religion, and social change in diverse societies. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pargament, K. I. (1997). The psychology of religion and coping: Theory, research, practice. New York: Guilford Press.
Pearce, L. D., & Axinn, W. G. (1998). The impact of family religious life on the quality of mother-child relations. American Sociological Review, 63, 810–828.
Popenoe, D. (1988). Disturbing the nest: Family change and decline in modern societies. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
Popenoe, D. (1996). Life without father. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Riesebrodt, M. (1993). Pious passion: The emergence of modern fundamentalism in the United States and Iran (D. Reneau, Trans.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Roof, W. C. (1993). A generation of seekers: The spiritual journeys of the baby boom generation. San Francisco: Harper.
Roof, W. C., & Gesch, L. (1995). Boomers and the culture of choice: Changing patterns of work, family, and religion. In N. Ammerman & W. C. Roof (Eds.), Work, family, and religion in contemporary society. New York: Routledge.
Sciolino, E. (2001). Persian mirrors: The elusive face of Iran. Free Press.
Shehan, C. L., Bock, E. W., & Lee, G. R. (1990). Religious heterogamy, religiosity, and marital happiness: The case of Catholics. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 73–79.
Sherkat, D. E. (1991). Religious socialization and the family: An examination of religious influence in the family over the life course. Unpublished dissertation, Sociology Department, Duke University. Durham, NC.
Sherkat, D. E. (2003). Religious socialization: Sources of influence and influences of agency. In M. Dillon (Ed.), The handbook of the sociology of religion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sherkat, D. E., & Ellison, C. G. (1999). Recent developments and current controversies in the sociology of religion. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 363–394.
Smith, C. (1998). American evangelicalism: Embattled and thriving. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Smith, C. (2000). Christian America?: What evangelicals really want. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Smith, C., & Kim, P. Family religious involvement and the quality of family relationships for early adolescents. Chapel Hill, NC: National Study of Youth and Religion.
Smith, S. R. (2000). Land of the rising son? Domestic organization, ancestor worship, and economic change in Japan. In S. K. Houseknecht & J. G. Pankhurst (Eds.), Family, religion, and social change in diverse societies. New York: Oxford University Press.
Stark, R. (1996). The rise of Christianity: A sociologist reconsiders history. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Stark, R., & Finke, R. (2000). Acts of faith: Explaining the human side of religion. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Stolzenberg, R. M., Blair-Loy, M., & Waite, L. J. (1995). Religious participation in early adulthood: Age and family life cycle effects on church membership. American Sociological Review, 60, 84–103.
Straus, M. A. (1994). Beating the devil out of them: Corporal punishment in American families. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51, 273–286.
Thompson, L., & Walker, A. (1989). Gender in families: Women and men in marriage, work, and parenthood. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 845–871.
Thornton, A. (1985). Reciprocal influences of family and religion in a changing world. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 381–94.
Thornton, A. (2004). Reading history sideways: The fallacy and enduring impact of the developmental paradigm on family life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Thornton, A., Axinn, W. G., & Hill, D. H. (1992). Reciprocal effects of religiosity, cohabitation, and marriage. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 628–651.
Thornton, A., & Lin, H.-S. (1994). Social change and the family in Taiwan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Tilley, J. R. (2003). Secularization and aging in Britain: Does family formation cause greater religiosity? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 42, 269–278.
Trost, J., & Palm, I. (2000). Family and religion in Sweden. In S. K. Houseknecht & J. G. Pankhurst (Eds.), Family, religion, and social change in diverse societies. New York: Oxford University Press.
Waite, L., & Gallagher, M. (2000). The case for marriage. New York: Doubleday.
Waite, L., & Lehrer, E. (2003). The benefits from marriage and religion in the United States: A comparative analysis. Population and Development Review, 29, 255–275.
Wallace, J. M., Forman, T. A., Caldwell, C. H., & Willis, D. S. (2003). Religion and U.S. secondary school students: Current patterns, recent trends, and sociodemographic. Youth and Society, 35, 98–125.
Warner, R. S. (1993). Work in progress toward a new paradigm for the sociological study of religion in the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1044–1093.
Wilcox, W. B. (1998). Conservative protestant childrearing: Authoritarian or authoritative? American Sociological Review, 63, 796–809.
Wilcox, W. B. (2002a). For the sake of the children?: Family-related discourse and practice in the mainline. In R. Wuthnow & J. H. Evans (Eds.), The quiet hand of God: Faith-based activism and the public role of mainline protestantism (pp. 287–316). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Wilcox, W. B. (2002b). Sacred vows, public purposes: Religion, the marriage movement, and public policy. Washington, DC: Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life.
Wilcox, W. B. (2002c). Religion, convention, and paternal involvement. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 780–792.
Wilcox, W. B. (2002d, June 25). Religion, parenting, and child well-being. Commission on Children at Risk, Hanover, NH: Dartmouth Medical School.
Wilcox, W. B. (2003). Conservative protestants and the family: Resisting, engaging, or accommodating modernity? In M. Cromartie (Ed.), A public faith: Varieties of evangelical civic engagement. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Wilcox, W. B. (2004). Soft patriarchs, new men: How Christianity shapes fathers and husbands. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wilcox, W. B. (2005). Mainline protestantism and the family. In D. Browning & D. Clairmont (Eds.), American religions and the family. New York: Columbia University Press.
Wilcox, W. B., & Bartkowski, J. P. (2000). The conservative protestant family: Traditional rhetoric, progressive practice. InE. J. Dionne & J. J. DiIulio (Eds.), What’s God got to do with the American experiment? Essays on religion and politics. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Wuthnow, R. (1989). Communities of discourse: Ideology and structure in the reformation, the enlightenment, and European socialism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wuthnow, R. (1998). After heaven: Spirituality in America since the 1950s. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wilcox, W.B. (2006). Family. In: Ebaugh, H.R. (eds) Handbook of Religion and Social Institutions. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23789-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23789-5_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-25703-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-23789-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)