Skip to main content

Dose of Progestogen in Postmenopausal Combined Hormone Therapy and Risk of Endometrial Cancer

  • Chapter
  • 592 Accesses

Summary

Progestogens are given to diminish the risk of endometrial cancer (ECA) observed with postmenopausal estrogen therapy. The pattern of progestogen administration and number of days that the progestogen is given per month appear to affect ECA risk. We studied the impact of dose of progestogen, specifically medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), on ECA risk in a population-based case control study of 647 cases and 1,209 controls, ages 45–74 years. Among women who took a combined hormone regimen with MPA for less than 10 days/mo, the overall adjusted risk of ECA (relative to that of hormone non-users) was 4.2 [95%, Confidence Interval (CI) 2.0, 8.9] in those with an MPA dose less than 70 mg/mo; and the adjusted risk of ECA was 2.8 (95%, CI 0.9, 8.6) in those with a higher monthly MPA dose. Among women who took MPA cyclically for 10–24 days/mo or as continuous combined therapy, the risk of ECA was similar to non-users, irrespective of the monthly dose. Our findings showed that among the combined hormone regimens most commonly used by postmenopausal women in the USA today, monthly dose of MPA bears little or no relation to risk of ECA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Grady D, Gebretsadik T, Kerlikowske K, et al (1995) Hormone replacement therapy and endometrial cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 85:304–313.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Beresford SA, Weiss NS, Voigt LF, et al (1997) Risk of endometrial cancer in relation to use of oestrogen combined with cyclic progestagen therapy in postmenopausal women. Lancet 349:458–461.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hill DA, Weiss, NS, Beresford SA, et al (2000) Continuous combined hormone replacement therapy and risk of endometrial cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:1456–1461.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pike MC, Peters RK, Cozen W, et al (1997) Estrogen-progestin replacement therapy and endometrial cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 89:1110–1115.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Weiderpass E, Adami H-O, Baron JA, et al (1999) Risk of endometrial cancer following estrogen replacement with and without progestins. J Natl Cancer Inst 91:1131–1137.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Greendale GA, Reboussin BA, Hogan P, et al (1998) Symptom relief and side effects of postmenopausal hormones: results from the Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions Trial. Obstet Gynecol 92:982–988.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hill DA, Weiss NS, LaCroix AZ (2000) Adherence to postmenopausal hormone therapy during the year after the initial prescription: A population-based study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182:270–276.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. The Writing Group for the PEPI trial (1995) Effects of estrogen or estrogen/progestin regimens on heart disease risk factors in postmenopausal women. The Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions (PEPI) Trial. JAMA 273:199–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Writing Group for the Women’s Health Initiative Investigators (2002) Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results from the Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA 288:321–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ross RK, Paganini-Hill A, Wan PC, et al (2000) Effect of hormone replacement therapy on breast cancer risk: estrogen versus estrogen plus progestin. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:328–332.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schairer C, Lubin J, Troisi R, et al (2000) Estrogen-progestin replacement and risk of breast cancer. JAMA 284:691–694.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Li CI, Weiss NS, Stanford JL, et al (2000) Hormone replacement therapy in relation to risk of lobular and ductal breast carcinoma in middle-aged women. Cancer 88:2570–2577.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Reed, S.D., Voigt, L.F., Beresford, S.A., Hill, D.A., Doherty, J.A., Weiss, N.S. (2005). Dose of Progestogen in Postmenopausal Combined Hormone Therapy and Risk of Endometrial Cancer. In: Li, J.J., Li, S.A., Llombart-Bosch, A. (eds) Hormonal Carcinogenesis IV. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23761-5_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23761-5_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-23783-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-23761-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics