Advertisement

Implementing the Learner-Centered Design Paradigm for Web-Based Training Curricula

  • Panagiotis Zaharias
  • Angeliki Poulymenakou
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT, volume 167)

Abstract

e-Learning environments provide exciting possibilities for learning and training, but dropout rates are high and the quality of e-Learning courses is being questioned. Capturing requirements, and developing usable e-learning courses, focusing on usability and user-centred design are of high importance. Such efforts must be redefined for e-learning contexts. This paper stresses the need for usable and effective e-learning design and describes the authors’ experience in adapting methods and techniques of human-centred design implementing a learner-centred approach to the design e-Learning.

Key words

design-technology learner-centred design learning materials 

References

  1. Career Space project, (2000). Software & Applications Development job profile. Available at http://www.career-space.com/downloads/index.htmGoogle Scholar
  2. Diaz, D. P. (2002). Online Drop Rates Revisited. The Technology Source, May/June 2002. Available at http://ts.mivu.org/default.asp?show=article&id=981Google Scholar
  3. Ganzel, R. (2001). Associated Learning, Online Learning Magazine, May. Available at http://www.onlinelearningmag.com/Google Scholar
  4. Honey, P., & Mumford, A. (1992). The manual of learning styles. Maidenhead: Peter HoneyGoogle Scholar
  5. ISO (1999). Human-centred design processes for interactive systems. Geneva: ISOGoogle Scholar
  6. Johnson S., & Aragon S. (2002). An Instructional Strategy Framework for Online Learning Environments. In proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare & Higher Education, (pp. 529–536). Norfolk, VA: AACEGoogle Scholar
  7. Jones, A. et al. (1999). Contexts for evaluating educational software, Interacting with Computers 11(5) 499–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar
  9. Lee, S. H., (1999). Usability Testing for Developing Effective Interactive Multimedia Software: Concepts, Dimensions, and Procedures. Educational Technology and Society, 2(1), 20–29.Google Scholar
  10. Lohr. L L. (2000). Designing the instructional interface. Computers in Human Behaviour. 16 161–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lynch, P. J., & Horton, S. (1997). Web Style Guide Basic Design Principles for Creating Web sites. Yale University Press. Available http://www.info.med.yale.edu/caim/manuGoogle Scholar
  12. Maguire M. (2001). Methods to support human-centred design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 5, 587–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mayes. J. T., & Fowler C. J. (1999). Learning technology and usability: a framework for understanding courseware, Interacting with Computers 11(5) 485–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Murray, B. (2001). What Makes Students Stay? ACM eLearn Magazine. (May). Available at http://www.elearnmag.org/Google Scholar
  15. Nelson, R. R., Whitener, E. M., & Philcox, H. H., (1995). The Assessment of End-User Training Needs. Communications of the ACM, 38(7), 27–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nielsen, J. (2000). Designing web usability: The practice of simplicity. Indianapolis: New Riders Publishing.Google Scholar
  17. Nielsen, J. (1994). Heuristic evaluation. In J. Nielsen & R. Mack (Eds.), Usability inspection methods. New York: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nielson, J. (1991). Paper versus computer implementations as mock up scenarios for heuristic evaluation. In D. Diaper, et al. (Eds), Proceedings of the IFIP Third International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 315–320). Amsterdam: North-HollandGoogle Scholar
  19. Notess, M. (2001). Usability, User Experience, and Learner Experience. ACM eLearn Magazine. [Tutorial]. Available at http://www.elearnmag.org/Google Scholar
  20. Ostroff, C. and Ford, J. K. (1989). Assessing training needs: Critical levels of analysis. In Training and Development in Organizations. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1989, 25–62Google Scholar
  21. Preece, J., Rogers, Y., Sharp, H. et al., (1994). Human-computer interaction, Workingham, England: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  22. Shneiderman, B. (1998). Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective Human-Computer Interaction. (3rd edition). Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  23. Smulders, D., (2002). Designing for Learners, Designing for Users. ACM eLearn Magazine. Available at http://www.elearnmag.org/subpage/sub_page.cfm?section=3/Google Scholar
  24. Weston, C, Gandell, T., McApline, L., and Filkenstein, A. (1999). Designing Instruction for the Context of Online Learning, The Internet and Higher Education 2(1), 35–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zaharias, P., Poulymenakou, A. (2003a). Identifying training needs for ICT skills enhancement in South-Eastern Europe: Implications for designing web-based training courses Educational Technology & Society, 6(1). Available at http://ifets.ieee.orgGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Panagiotis Zaharias
    • 1
  • Angeliki Poulymenakou
    • 1
  1. 1.Athens University of Economics & BusinessGreece

Personalised recommendations