Advertisement

Distance Learning Approaches in Teacher Training

Variables Related To Teacher-Training Students’ Preferences
  • Yaacov J. Katz
Part of the IFIP International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT, volume 167)

Abstract

Forty two teacher-training students participated in a 60 hour, year long teacher-training course that used two different distance learning approaches. Students worked in the first semester with synchronous Picture-Tel® videoconferencing, and in second semester with an asynchronous Internet based course. Their comparative satisfaction with each delivery system, and their comparative level of control of the learning process were examined. Results indicate that the interactive and asynchronous Internet Distance Learning approach contributes to a significantly higher level of satisfaction and higher level of control of the learning process than the interactive synchronous system. It is suggested that when the issue of introducing Distance Learning at the college level for teacher-training students is addressed, it is preferable to install an interactive Internet type method rather than a Picture-Tel® type system in order to best promote student satisfaction as well as student level of control of the learning situation.

Key words

distance learning Internet level of control satisfaction videoconference 

References

  1. Carswell, A. D. & Venkatesh, V. (2002). Learner outcomes in an asynchronous distance education environment. Int. Journal of Human Computer Studies, 56(5), 475–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Davies, T. G., & Quick, D. (2001). Reducing distance through Distance Learning: the community college leadership doctoral program at Colorado State University Community College. Journal of Research and Practice, 25(8),607–620.Google Scholar
  3. Glave, J. (1998). Dramatic Internet growth continues. Wired News. (online) http://www.com/news/news/email/other/technology/story/10323.html.Google Scholar
  4. Hwang, W., Shiu, R., Wu, S., & Li, C. (2002). An exploration of learning ability transition and material information. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 26(3), 301–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Katz, Y. J. (1994). Self-image, locus of control and computer-related attitudes. In R. Lewis and P. Mendelsohn (Eds.), Lessons from learning. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  6. Katz, Y. J. (1998). The relationship between distance learning methods and satisfaction and achievement of college students. In G. Davies (Ed.), Teleteaching’ 98: Distance learning, training and education. Vienna, OCG and IFIP.Google Scholar
  7. McCullagh, W. & Stacey, E. (1993). Telematics implications for Teacher Education. In G. Davies and B. Samways (Eds.), Teleteaching. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  8. Trentin, G. (1997). Telematics and on-line teacher-training: the POLARIS project. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 13, 261–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yaacov J. Katz
    • 1
  1. 1.School of EducationBar-Ilan UniversityRamat-GanIsrael

Personalised recommendations