Advertisement

Simulations as Mental Tools for Network-Based Group Learning

  • Miika Lehtonen
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT, volume 167)

Abstract

The article presents pedagogical and technological applications developed and studied as part of the research project ‘Web-supported Mental Tools in Technology Education’ at the University of Lapland. The applications allow simulation tools, modern network-based solutions that support learning, and other mental tools, as well as traditional and modern digital learning materials, to be smoothly integrated into normal teaching-studying-learning activity. For example, efforts have been made make use of edutainment as part of the nature of tools and materials and game-like interactivity to enhance the learning process. The broader framework for the model of learning activity that is being developed and studied in the project centers on the question how and through which learning activity (learning process) study and learning in the field of electric technology and electronics (technical work and technology education) can be organized to take into account the challenges posed by the post-industrial information society.

Key words

Distance Learning Games Learning Models Research Simulation 

References

  1. Bransford, J., Brown, A.L. & Cocking, R.R. (Eds.) (2000). How people learn. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  2. Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction. 8, 293–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Crawford, C. (1984). The art of Computer game design. Berkley, USA: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  4. Farnill, D. (2001). Communication in a medical emergency. Dept of Behavioural Sciences. University of Sydney. Retrieved February 12, 2003 from http://www.gmp.usyd.edu.au/vguide/students/samplew/mscp/learningtopics/Kk9HHkf.htm 1Google Scholar
  5. Galperin, P.J. (1979). Johdatus psykologiaan. Suom. Riitta Kauppila, Klaus Helkama Helsinki. Kansankulttuuri.Google Scholar
  6. Gonzales, J. J., Reitman, L. & Stagno, T. (2001). An Interactive System for Teaching Electronics. Seminar paper presented at the 2001 ED-media conference, Tampere. June 25–30. 2001.Google Scholar
  7. Gokhale, A. 1996. Effectiveness of Computer Simulation for Enhancing Higher Order Thinking. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education. 33(4), 36–46. Retrieved February 12, 2003 from http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JITE/v33n4/jite-v33n4.gokhale.htmlGoogle Scholar
  8. Jonassen, D.H. (2000). Computers as mindtools for schools. Engaging critical thinking. (2nd ed). NJ. Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  9. Kangas, S. (1999). Mukautuvat käyttöliittymät elektronisissa peleissä. In T. Honkela (Ed.), Pelit, tietokone ja ihminen. [Games, Computers and People]. (pp. 128–134) Suomen tekoälyseuran julkaisuja. Symposiosarja No 15. University of Art and Design UIAH & Finnish Association of Artificial Intelligence. HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  10. Kapetelinin, V. & Nardi, B.A. (1997). Activity Theory: Basic Concepts and Applications. Retrieved February 12, 2003 from http://www.acm.org/sigchi/chi97/proceedings/tutorial/bn.htmGoogle Scholar
  11. Lehtonen, M. (2002a). Toward the Information Age Challenges in Technology Education. Modern learning methods & learning media supported and mediated learning processes as part of the new university technology education curriculum. In J. Kantola,. & T. Kananoj (Eds.), Looking at the Future: technical work in context of technology education. (pp.99–119) University of Jyväskylä: Jyväskylä University Printing House.Google Scholar
  12. Lehtonen, M. (2002b). Simulaatioiden avulla tapahtuvan oppimistoiminnan mallin ja sitä tukevien Web-pohjaisten välineiden kehittäminen teknisessä työssä ja teknologiakasvatuksessa. Paper presented at the 2002 ITK’02 Conference Workshop of Researchers. Ministry of Education and the University of Tampere Hypermedia Laboratory. 17.4.2002. Hämeenlinna, FIGoogle Scholar
  13. Lehtonen, M. (2002). The Online Interactive Curriculum Portal as One Key to the Well-Structured Learning Activity of Students. World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications. 2002(1), 1110–1115. [Online]. Available: http://dl.aace.org/10288Google Scholar
  14. Min, F.B. (1992). Parallel instruction, a theory for educational computer simulation. Interactive Learning International, 6(3), 117–183.Google Scholar
  15. Podolskij, A. (1997). Instructional Design for Schooling. Developmental Issues. In S. Dijkstra et al. (Eds.) Instructional Design. International perspectives. (Vol. 2). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  16. Vahtivuori, S., Ruokamo, H., Telia, S., & Tuovinen, H. (2002). Pedagogical Models in the Design and Assessment of Network-Based Education. World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications. 2002(1), 1676–1681. [Online]. Available: http://dl.aace.org/10418Google Scholar
  17. Sweller, J., & Chandler, P. (1994). Why some material is difficult to learn. Cognition and Instruction, 12, 185–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Uljens, M. (1997). School didactics and learning. Hove, East Sussex: Psychology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Wilson, B. & Cole, P. (1996). Improving Traditional Instruction. Cognitive Load Theory. Retrieved February 12, 2003 from http://carbon.cudenver.edu/~bwilson/cog/sweller.htmlGoogle Scholar
  21. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978/1932). Mind in Society. Cambridge. Massachusetts. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miika Lehtonen
    • 1
  1. 1.University of LaplandLaplandFinland

Personalised recommendations