Skip to main content

Dispersion of Group Judgments

The Geometric Expected Value Operator

  • Conference paper
The Next Wave in Computing, Optimization, and Decision Technologies

Part of the book series: Operations Research/Computer Science Interfaces Series ((ORCS,volume 29))

Abstract

To achieve a decision with which the group is satisfied, the group members must accept the judgments, and ultimately the priorities. This requires that (a) the judgments be homogeneous, and (b) the priorities of the individual group members be compatible with the group priorities. There are three levels in which the homogeneity of group preference needs to be considered: (1) for a single paired comparison (monogeneity), (2) for an entire matrix of paired comparisons (multigeneity), and (3) for a hierarchy or network (omnigeneity). In this paper we study monogeneity and the impact it has on group priorities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aczel, J. and T. L. Saaty, 1983, Procedures for synthesizing ratio judgments. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 27: 93–102.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Condon, E., B. Golden and E. Wasil, 2003, Visualizing group decisions in the analytic hierarchy process. Computers & Operations Research 30: 1435–1445.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Galambos, J., 1978, The asymptotic theory of extreme order statistics. New York, J. Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, R. D. and S. Johansen, 1990, A Survey of product-integration with a view toward application in survival analysis. The Annals of Statistics 18(4): 1501–1555.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ramanathan, R. and L. S. Ganesh, 1994, Group preference aggregation methods employed in the AHP: An evaluation and an Intrinsic process for deriving member’s weightages. European Journal of Operational Research 79: 249–269.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L., 1994, Fundamentals of decision making. Pittsburgh, PA, RWS Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L. and L. G. Vargas, 2003, The Possibility of group choice: Pairwise comparisons and merging functions. Working Paper, The Joseph M. Katz Graduate School of Business, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Saaty, T.L., Vargas, L.G. (2005). Dispersion of Group Judgments. In: Golden, B., Raghavan, S., Wasil, E. (eds) The Next Wave in Computing, Optimization, and Decision Technologies. Operations Research/Computer Science Interfaces Series, vol 29. Springer, Boston, MA . https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23529-9_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23529-9_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-23528-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-23529-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics