Intelligent Marine Control Systems

  • Roman Śmierzchalski
Conference paper


The paper discusses current directions of development in marine control systems, special attention being paid to artificial intelligence methods. Taking into account tasks attributed to the control of particular processes on a ship, the control systems were divided into integrated sub-systems. The ship was defined as an intelligent machine making use of artificial intelligence to control processes.

Key words

integrated control system artificial intelligent ship control evolutionary computation intelligent machine 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Balchen J. G. 1995. Modelling, identification and control, Vol. 15, No. 3, Research Council of Norway.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Burns R. S. 1992. An Intelligent Integrated Ship Guidance System. 2nd IFAC Workshop Control Applications in Marine Systems, Genova, Italy.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Burns R. S. 1995. An intelligent automatic guidance system for surface ships. Marine Technology and Transportation, Coputational Mechanics Publications, Southampton, Boston, pp. 641–652.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Burns R. S. 1995. The aplication of artificial intelligence techniques to modelling and control of surface ships. Eleventh Ship Control Systems Symposium, Coputational Mechanics Publications, Southampton, Boston Vol. 1, pp. 77–83.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Dove M. I, Burns R. S., Stockel C. T. 1986. An Automatic Collision Avoidance and Guidance System for Marine Vehicles in Confined Waters. Journal of Navigation, Vol. 39.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Furuhashi T, Nakaoka K, Uchikawa Y. 1996. A Study on Classifier System for Finding Control Knowledge of Multi-Input Systems F. Herrera, J.L. Verdegay Editors. Genetic Algorithms and Soft Computing, Phisica-Verlang.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Hayashi S, Kuwajima S, Sotooka K, Yamakazi H, Murase H. 1991. A stranding avoidance system using radar image matching: development and experiment. Journal of Navigation, Vol. 44.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Iijima Y, Hayashi S. 1991. Study towards a twenty-first century intelligent ship. Journal of Navigation, Vol. 44.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Iijima Y, Hagiwara H. 1994. Results of Collision Avoidance Manoeuvre Experiments Using a Knowledge-Based Autonomous Piloting System. Journal of Navigation, Vol. 47.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Lin HS, Xiao J, Michalewicz Z. 1994. Evolutionary Algorithm for Path Planning in Mobile Robot Environment. Proceeding IEEE Int. Conference of Evolutionary Computation, Orlando, Florida,.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Michalewicz Z. 1996. Genetic Algorithms + Data structures = Evolution Programs. Spriger-Verlang, 3rd edition.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Michalewicz Z, Xiao J. 1995. Evaluation of Paths in Evolutionary Planner/Navigator. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Biologically Inspired Evolutionary Systems, Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Śmierzchalski R, The Decision Support System to Design the Safe Manoeuvre Avoiding Collision at Sea. 14th International Conference Information Systems Analysis and Synthesis, Orlando, USA, 1996.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Śmierzchalski R, Multi-Criterion Modeling the Collision Situation at Sea for Application in Decision Support. 1996. 3rd International Symp. on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics, Miedzyzdroje, Poland.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Śmierzchalski R. 1997. Trajectory planning for ship in collision situations at sea by evolutionary computation. 4th IFAC Conference on Manoeuvring and Control of Marine, Brijuni, Creotia.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Śmierzchalski R. 1997. Dynamic Aspect in Evolutionary Computation on Example of Avoiding Collision at Sea. 4th International Symp. on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics, Międzyzdroje, Poland.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Śmierzchalski R. 1997. Evolutionary Guidance System for Ship in Collisions Situation at Sea. 3rd IFAC Conference Intelligent Autonomous Vehicle, Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Śmierzchalski R, Michalewicz Z. 1998. Adaptive Modeling of a Ship Trajectory in Collision Situations. 2nd IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence, Alaska, USAGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Sudhendar H, Grabowski M. 1996. Evolution of Intelligent Shipboard Piloting Systems: A Distributed System for the St Lawrence Seaway. Journal of Navigation, Vol. 49.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Trojanowski K, Michalewicz Z. 1998. Planning Path of Mobil Robot (in Polish). 1st Conference Evolutionary Algorithms, Murzasichle, Poland.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Witt NA, Sutton R, Miller KM. 1994. Recent Technological Advances in the Control and Guidance of Ship. Journal of Navigation Vol. 47.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Xiao J, Michalewicz Z, Zhang L. 1996. Evolutionary Planner/Navigator: Operator Performance and Self-Tuning. Proceeding IEEE Int. Conference of Evolutionary Computation, Nagoya, Japan.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    Zhang Y., Hearn G.E., Sena P. 1995. Neural network approaches to a class of ship control problems. Part I and II. Eleventh Ship Control Systems Symposium, Coputational Mechanics Publications, Southampton, Boston Vol. 1, pp. 115–150.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roman Śmierzchalski
    • 1
  1. 1.Gdynia Maritime UniversityGdyniaPoland

Personalised recommendations