8. Conclusion
The challenges of the transportation field continue and expand and the New Transportation Faculty — the I-Beam-Shaped New Transportation Faculty — has a special role therein in integrating knowledge, innovating, and effectively instructing the T-shaped New Transportation Professional.
But the challenges and opportunities are broader. Consider transportation as a special case of CLIOS and the special advantage the New Transportation Faculty has, given the inherently integrative nature of its intellectual approach and its track record in establishing how this integrated approach can impact the important societal domain of transportation. The future role of the New Transportation Faculty can include an engineering systems attack on societal issues using the CLIOS construct.
This positions faculty members to make important broader contributions to society and provides an intellectual growth path within academia, one that is in total concert with the new post-Cold War mission of the university for relevant, shorter timeframe approaches to important societal and industry problems.
Nor is the transportation field disadvantaged by this. The intellectual stimulation for the “New Transportation Faculty” can only make approaches to the core issues of transportation more effective.
Reprinted with permission of the Eno Foundation. Sussman, Joseph M., “The New Transportation Faculty: The Evolution to Engineering Systems”, Transportation Quarterly, Eno Transportation Foundation, Washington, DC, Summer 1999.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Sussman, Joseph M., “Educating the ‘New Transportation Professional’”, ITS Quarterly, ITS America, Washington, DC, Summer 1995.
Sussman, Joseph M., “ITS: A short History and a Perspective on the Future”, Transportation Quarterly, Vol. 50, No. 4, Anniversary Issue, 1996, ENO Transportation Foundation, Inc., Lansdowne, VA, p. 115–125.
Porter, Michael E., Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors, The Free Press, 1980.
Kanter, Rosabeth Moss, World Class: Thriving Locally in the Global Economy, Simon & Schuster, New York, 1995.
“Inside the Knowledge Factory”, The Economist, October 4, 1997, pp. 3–5.
Levine, Arthur, “How the Academic Profession is Changing”, Daedalus, Fall 1997.
Mitchell, Theodore R., “Border Crossings: Organizational Boundaries and Challenges to the American Professorate”, Daedalus, Fall 1997.
Fine, Charles H., Clock Speed: Winning Industry Control in the Age of Temporary Advantage, Perseus Books, October 1998.
Lenzer, Robert and Stephen S. Johnson, “Seeing things as they really are”, Forbes, March 10, 1997.
Vest, Charles, “MIT: The Path to Our Future”, Report of the President, Academic Year 1997–1998, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, September 1998.
Sussman, Joseph M., “ITS and Rescuing Prometheus”, ITS Quarterly, ITS America, Washington, DC, Winter 1998.
“A Report to the National Science Foundation on the Workshop on Planning, Design, Management and Control of Transportation Systems”, June 15, 1998.
Wulf, William A., “The Urgency of Engineering Education Reform”, The Bridge, Spring 1998.
Hughes, Thomas P., Rescuing Prometheus, Pantheon Books, New York, 1998.
“The Report of the MIT Task Force on Student Life and Learning”, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 1998.
Kennedy, Donald, Academic Duty, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1997.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2005). The New Transportation Faculty: The Evolution to Engineering Systems. In: Perspectives on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS). Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23260-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23260-5_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-23257-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-23260-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)