Advertisement

An Integrated Approach to Battlefield Situation Assessment

  • Yang Fan 
  • Chang Guocen 
  • Duan Tao 
  • Hua Wenjian 
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT, volume 163)

Abstract

Situation assessment (SA) is the basis for many of the planning activities performed by the battlefield commander and staff. And as a very complex military process, it requires the cooperation of lots of information processing technology. Multi-agents system (MAS) is a useful method to model the complex Command and Control (C2) system. In this paper, we present a multi-agents model for situation assessment. The three main components of this model, which are computation, reasoning and communication, were designed in detail by integrating series of new and useful technology. The computation component calculates the Battlefield Initiative; the reasoning component makes the situation prediction; and the communication component gives a help to interchange situation information among the Situation Assessment Agents (SA-Agents).This model can integrate qualitative reasoning, quantitative computing and multi-source communicating as a whole, and give the result of situation assessment and the risk value to take it, which is very useful in the C2 system simulation.

Key words

situation assessment multi-agents system command and control 

References

  1. 1.
    Yang Fan, Study on Battlefield Situation Assessment in Command Automation of Air Unit, muster thesis, (Air Force Engineering University, Xi’an, China, 2002).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Clinton Heinze, Simon Goss, and Adrian Pearce. Plan Recognition in Military Simulation: Incorporating Machine Learning with Intelligent Agents. In: Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Workshop on Team Behavior and Plan Recognition, (Stockholm, Sweden, 1999), pp.53–63.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wynn Stirling, A Model for Multiple Agent Decision Making, In: Proceedings of the 1991 IEEE Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. (New York, 1991), pp.2073–2078.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mazda Ahmadi, Mehran Motamed and Jafar Habibi, Arian: A General Architecture for Advisable Agents, In: International Conference of Machine Learning; Models, Technologies und Applications (MLMTA–03), (Las Vegas, Nevada, 2003), pp. 17–23.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nathan Griffiths and Michael Luck, Cooperative plan selection through trust. In: Multi-Agent System Engineering: Proceedings of the Ninth European Workshop on Modelling Autonomous Agents in a Multi-Agent World, edited by F. J. Garijo and M. Boman, (Springer, 1999), pp. 162–174.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Federation for Information Processing 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yang Fan 
    • 1
  • Chang Guocen 
    • 1
  • Duan Tao 
    • 1
  • Hua Wenjian 
    • 1
  1. 1.The Telecommunication Engineering InstituteAir Force Engineering UniversityXi’an, ShaanxiChina

Personalised recommendations