Summary and Conclusions
I opened this chapter by arguing that theoretical relevance is the most important criterion for sampling. The composition of units in the sample should match the theory used. Statistical representativeness is desirable when possible to achieve at all, but secondary to theoretical relevance. We have further observed that entrepreneurship research can be conducted on many different levels of analysis, and that each level has its problems that have to be dealt with. It is not always possible to overcome those problems—there is no such thing as “perfect” research—but it is certainly worth trying to solve as many as possible and to be aware of the remaining shortcomings of one’s sample.
Importantly, the most conventional levels of analysis in entrepreneurship research—the individual and the firm—are not markedly less problematic than are other alternatives. This insight should provide incentive for researchers to consider leaving the most trodden paths and apply other levels of analyses than those that first come to mind.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer Science + Business Media, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2004). Sampling Issues. In: Researching Entrepreneurship. International Studies in Entrepreneurship, vol 5. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23054-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23054-8_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-22838-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-23054-2
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)