Skip to main content

Evaluating Speech Separation Systems

  • Chapter
Speech Separation by Humans and Machines

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barker, J., Cooke, M., and Ellis, D., 2004, Decoding speech in the presence of other sources, submitted to Speech Communication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A.J. and Sejnowski, T.J., 1995, An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution, Neural Computation, 7(6): 1129–1159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourlard, H., Hermansky, H., and Morgan, N., 1996, Towards increasing speech recognition error rates, Speech Communication, pages 205–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. J. and Cooke, M., 1994, Computational auditory scene analysis, Computer speech and language, 8:297–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, V., 1945, As we may think. The Atlantic Monthly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherry, E.G., 1953, Some experiments on the recognition of speech with one and two ears. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 25:975–979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, B., Sawhney, N., and Pentland, A., 1998, Auditory context awareness via wearable computing, in Proc. Perceptual User Interfaces Workshop.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, M.P., 1991, Modelling auditory processing and organisation. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Sheffeld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, M., Green, P., Josifovski, L., and Vizinho, A., 2001, Robust automatic speech recognition with missing and unreliable acoustic data, Speech Communication, 34(3):267–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, M.D., Brown, G.J., Cooke, M.P., and Green, P.D., 1994, Design, collection and analysis of amulti-simultaneous-speaker corpus, In Proc. Inst. Acoustics, volume 5, pages 183–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, D.P.W., 1996, Prediction-driven computational auditory scene analysis. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, M.I.T.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, G. and Wang, D.L., 2003, Monaural speech separation, in Advances in NIPS 13, Cambridge MA. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, H. and Tranel, B., 1971, The Lombard sign and the role of hearing in speech. J. Speech and Hearing Res., (14):677–709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, N., Baron, D., Edwards, J., Ellis, D., Gelbart, D., Janin, A., Pfau, T., Shriberg, E., and Stolcke, A., 2001, The meeting project at ICSI, in Proc. Human Lang. Tech. Conf., pages 246–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallet, D.S., 1985, Performance assessment of automatic speech recognizers. J. Res. Natl. Bureau of Standards, 90:371–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D. and Hirsch, H.-G., 2000, The AURORA experimental framework for the performance evaluation of speech recognition systems under noisy conditions, in Proc. ICSLP’ 00, volume 4, pages 29–32, Beijing, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roweis, S., 2001, One-microphone source separation, in Advances in NIPS 11, pages 609–616. MIT Press, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt-Nielsen, A., Marsh, E., Tardelli, J., Gatewood, P., Kreamer, E., Tremain, T., Cieri, C., and Wright, J., 2000, Speech in Noisy Environments (SPINE), Evaluation Audio. Linguistic Data Consortium, Philadelphia PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiede, T., Treurniet. W.C., Bitto, R., Schmidmer, C. Sporer, T., Beerends, J.G., Colomes, C., Keyhl, M., Stoll, G., Brandeburg, K., and Feiten, B., 2000, PEAQ-the ITU standard for objective measurement of perceived audio quality, J. Audio Eng. Soc., 48(1/2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weintraub, M., 1985, A theory and computational model of auditory monoaural sound separation. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, H., Finke, M., and Waibel, A., 1999, Progress in automatic meeting transcription.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer Science + Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ellis, D.P.W. (2005). Evaluating Speech Separation Systems. In: Divenyi, P. (eds) Speech Separation by Humans and Machines. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-22794-6_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-22794-6_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8001-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-22794-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics