Using Information Systems to Build Capacity: A Public Health Improvement Tool Box

  • Jerry A. Schultz
  • Stephen B. Fawcett
  • Vincent T. Francisco
  • Bobbie Berkowitz
Part of the Health Informatics book series (HI)


The National Turning Point Initiative, jointly funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the W. K. Kellogg Foundation, is a major project dedicated to improving population health through an investment in strengthening and transforming the public health infrastructure. In this chapter, the methodology of the project and the ways in which the project is helping states and communities to improve public health are outlined. Much of the chapter focuses on changing and improving systems needed to help state and community partners to undertake activities associated with public health improvement. Central to this effort is the Internet-based Public Health Improvement Tool Box, developed by the Work Group on Health Promotion and Community Development at the University of Kansas. The PHI Tool Box provides access to information for supporting, documenting, and learning from the work of public health improvement. Although the initiative is ongoing and the lessons about it will come only later, the initiative and the PHI Tool Box are exciting developments in the field of public health at the state and local levels.


System Change Community Tool Faith Community Local Public Health Collaborative Planning 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Durch JS, Bailey LS, Stoto MA, eds. Improving Health in the Community: A Role for Performance Monitoring. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1997.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fawcett SB, Francisco VT, Hyra D, Paine-Andrews A, et al. Building healthy communities. In: Tarlov A, St. Peter R, eds. Society and Population Health: A State Perspective. New York: New Press; 2000.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fawcett SB, Francisco VT, Paine-Andrews A, Schultz JA. Working together for healthier communities: A research-based memorandum of collaboration. Public Health Rep 2000;115:174–179.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Roussos ST, Fawcett SB. A review of collaborative partnerships as a strategy for improving community health. Annu Rev Public Health 2000;21:369–402.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fawcett SB, Francisco VT, Paine-Andrews A. Promoting health through community development. In: Glenwick DS, Jason LA, eds. Promoting Health and Mental Health in Children, Youth and Families. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1993:233–255.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fawcett SB, Paine-Andrews AL, Francisco VT, Schultz JA, et al. Empowering community health initiatives through evaluation. In: Fetterman DM, Kafterian SJ, Wandersman A, eds. Empowerment Evaluation: Knowledge and Tools for Self-Assessment and Accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1996:167–187.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yasnoff WA, O’Carroll PW, Koo D, Linkins RW, et al. Public health informatics: Improving and transforming public health in the information age. J Public Manage Pract 2000;6(6):67–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Glenwick DS, Jason LA. Promoting Health and Mental Health in Children, Youth and Families. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1993.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Green LW, Kreuter MW. Health Promotion and Planning: An Educational and Environmental Approach. 2nd Ed. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield; 1991.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fawcett SB, Carson V, Collie V, Bremby R, et al. Promoting Healthfor All: An Action Planning Guide for Improving Access and Eliminating Disparities in Community Health. Work Group on Health Promotion and Community Development: University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS; 2000.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fawcett SB, Francisco VT, Schultz JA, Berkowitz B, et al. The Community Tool Box: An Internet-based resource for building healthier communities. Public Health 2000;115:274–278.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Francisco VT, Paine AL, Fawcett SB. A methodology for monitoring and evaluating community health coalitions. Health Educ Res 1993;8:403–406.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fawcett SB, Paine-Andrews A, Francisco VT, Schultz J, et al. Evaluating community initiatives for health and development. In: Rootman I, McQueen D, eds. Evaluation in Health Promotion; Principles and Perspectives. Copenhagen, Denmark: World Health Organization-Europe; 2001;241–270.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schultz JA, Fawcett SB, Francisco VT, Wolff T, et al. The Community Tool Box: Using the Internet to support the work of community health and development. Journal of Technology and Human Services. 2000;17:193–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Institute of Medicine. The Future of Public Health. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1988.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Public Health Practices. Public Health Practices Program Office; 1994.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fawcett SB, Paine-Andrews A, Francisco VT, Schultz JA, et al. Using empowerment theory in collaborative partnership for community health and development. Am J Community Psychol. 1995;23:677–697.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fawcett SB, Lewis RK, Paine-Andrews A, Francisco VT, et al. Evaluating community coalitions for prevention of substance abuse: The case of Project Freedom. Health EducBehav 1997;24:812–828.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fawcett SB, Sterling TD, Paine-Andrews A, Harris KJ, et al. Evaluating Community Efforts to Prevent Cardiovascular Diseases. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; 1995.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jerry A. Schultz
  • Stephen B. Fawcett
  • Vincent T. Francisco
  • Bobbie Berkowitz

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations