Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Health Informatics ((HI))

Overview

Both during development and after implementation of an information system, well-designed and timely evaluations are essential to help insure that the system accomplishes its intended purposes and is successful. In developing an evaluation, the evaluator needs to select an evaluation strategy and evaluation methods that are appropriate for analyzing the effectiveness of a system. Depending on the issues to be studied, an evaluator will select between subjectivist and objectivist methods or use a combination of both. Subjectivist strategies and methods focus on identifying the issues and the aspects of organizational culture that will impact system success. Objectivist strategies and methods, on the other hand, answer questions relative to specific and previously identified goals and objectives of a system. Regardless of the evaluation strategy and methods used, an evaluator’s conclusions will be of little use if they are not communicated in a clear, focused, credible evaluation report that directly addresses the purpose of the evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Friedman CP, Wyatt JC. Evaluation Methods in Medical Informatics. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1997.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Kaplan B. Addressing organizational issues into the evaluation of medical systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1997;4:94–101.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson JG, Aydin CE. Overview: theoretical perspectives and methodologies for the evaluation of health care information systems. In: Anderson JG, Aydin CE, Jay SJ, eds. Evaluating Health Care Information Systems: Methods and Applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1994:5–29.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lewis DA. Computer-based approaches to patient education: A review of the literature. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1999;6:272–282.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lange LL. Integrating public health data and information: A case example. In: Proceedings of the 1999 American Medical Informatics Association Symposium, Washington, DC, November 6–10, 1999:1104.6

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tang PC, et al. Meeting the information needs of patients: Results from a patient focus group. In: Proceedings of the 1997 American Medical Informatics Association Symposium, Nashville TN, October 25–29, 1997:672–676.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Forsythe DE. New bottles, old wine: Hidden cultural assumptions in a computerized explanation system for migraine sufferers. Med Anthropol Q 1996;10:551–574.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cannon DS, Allen SN. Comparison of the effects of computer and manual reminders on compliance with a mental health clinical practice guideline. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2000;7:196–203.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Overhage JM, et al. A randomized trial of “corollary orders” to prevent errors of omission. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1997;4:364–375.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rocca MA, et al. The evolution of a teledentistry system within the Department of Defense. In: Proceedings of the 1999 American Medical Informatics Association Symposium, Washington, DC, November 6–10, 1999:921–924.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Aydin CE, et al. Computers in the consulting room: A case study of clinician and patient perspectives. Health Care Manage Sci 1998;1:61–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Suggestion for Further Reading

  • Anderson JG. Evaluating clinical information systems: A step towards reducing medical errors. MD Comput 2000;17:21–23.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lewis, D. (2003). Evaluation for Public Health Informatics. In: O’Carroll, P.W., Ripp, L.H., Yasnoff, W.A., Ward, M.E., Martin, E.L. (eds) Public Health Informatics and Information Systems. Health Informatics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-22745-8_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-22745-8_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-3018-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-22745-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics