Abstract
International trade theory has come a long way since the days of the classical economists. However, the intuition that can be gained from the great theorists such as Adam Smith and David Ricardo still dominates the thinking of modern economists. In particular, Ricardo demonstrated that free trade was a “first-best” policy solution.1 This holds true today, even though the formal analysis of international trade theory has changed substantially. In fact, many of the opponents of international trade today (from the “anti-globalists” on the left of the political spectrum to the economic nationalists on its right) present arguments that Ricardo himself was able to dismiss over a hundred years ago. While the names and the subjects have changed, the basic principles have not.
Economists frequently distinguish between “first-best policies,” which unambiguously lead to greater efficiency, and “second-best policies,” which may or may not, as they inevitably involve some sort of tradeoff.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
This section borrows from Mordechai E Kreinin, INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS: A POLICY APPROACH (2002).
See, e.g., R.W. Jones, A Three-Factor Model in Theory, Trade, and History, in TRADE, BALANCE OF PAYMENTS, AND GROWTH, ESSAYS IN HONOR OF C. KINDLEBERGER (J. Bhagwati et all eds. 1971).
See, e.g., R. Vernon, International Investment and Trade in the Product Cycle, 80 QUARTERLYJOURNAL OF ECONOMICS 190 (May 1966); and L. Wells, A Product Cycle for International Trade?, JOURNAL OF MARKETING (July 1968). Note that rapid technological diffusion shortens the product cycle.
For discussion, see S. Linder, AN ESSAY ON TRADE AND TRANSFORMATION (1962); E. Helpman, International Trade in the Presence of Product Differentiation, Economies of Scale, and Monopolistic Competition, 11 JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS 305 (August 1981); and P. Krugman, New Theories of Trade among Industrial Countries, 73 AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW 343 (May 1983).
See J. Gannon, NAFTA Creates Jobs for Joe and José, WALL STREET JOURNAL, editorial page (March 29, 1993).
JACOB VINER, THE CUSTOMS UNION ISSUE (1950).
See, for example: James Meade, THE THEORY OF CUSTOMS UNIONS (1955); F. Gehrels, Customs Unions from a Single Country Viewpoint, 24 REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES 61 (195672-57); R. Lipsey, The Theory of Customs Unions: A General Survey, 70 THE ECONOMIC JOURNAL 496 (1960); M. Michaely, On Customs Unions and the Gains from Trade, 74 ECONOMIC JOURNAL 577 (Sept. 1965); R. Cooper and Massell, A New Look at Customs Union Theory, 75 ECONOMIC JOURNAL742 (December 1965); Wonnacott and Wonnacott, Is Unilateral Tariff Reduction Preferable to a Customs Union?, 71 AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW 704 (Sept. 1981); Kemp and Wan, An Elementary Proposition Concerning the Formation of Customs Unions, 6(1) JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS 95 (February 1976).
For a more detailed discussion of the microeconomic foundations of the economies-of-scale argument, see F.M. Scherer, INDUSTRIAL MARKET STRUCTURE AND ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE, Ch. 4 (1980).
See W. Cordon, Economies of Scale and Customs Union Theory, 73 JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 465–475 (June 1972) for a theoretical exposition of the effects of regional economic integration on economies of scale.
H. Leibenstein, Allocative Efficiency vs. X-Efficiency, 56 AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW 392 (1966)
This term is from R. Lipsey, The Theory of Customs Unions: A General Survey, in INTERNATIONAL TRADE: SELECTED READINGS 281 (J. Bhagwati ed. 1981).
Mordechai Kreinin, On the Dynamic Effects of a Customs Union, 72 JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY 193 (1964)
H. Johnson, An Economic Theory of Protectionism, Tariff Bargaining, and the Formation of Customs Unions, JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY 73, 256, 258 (April 1965)
Paul Krugman, Is Bilateralism Bad?, in INTERNATIONAL TRADE AND POLICY (Helpman and Krugman eds. 1991)
Jeffrey A. Frankel, Is Japan Creating a Yen Block in East Asia and the Pacific?, NBERWORKING PAPER NO. 4050, (April 1992)
Mordechai E. Kreinin and Michael G. Plummer, Natural Economic Blocs: An Alternative Formulation, 8(2) THE INTERNATIONAL TRADE JOURNAL 193 (Summer 1994)
For an extensive survey of these models, see Mordechai E. Krenin and Michael G. Plummer, ECONOMIC INTEGRATION AND DEVELOPMENT: HAS REGIONALISM DELIVERED FOR DEVELOPING COUNTRIES? (2002).
Peter A. Petri, East Asian Trade Integration: An Analytical History, in REGIONALISM AND RIVALRY: JAPAN AND THE UNITED STATES IN PACIFIC ASIA, CHAPTER ONE (1993).
Jeffrey Frankel, REGIONAL TRADE GROUPINGS (1998).
Frankel, note 27 supra.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kreinin, M.E., Plummer, M.G. (2005). Economic Principles of International Trade. In: Macrory, P.F.J., Appleton, A.E., Plummer, M.G. (eds) The World Trade Organization: Legal, Economic and Political Analysis. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-22688-5_37
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-22688-5_37
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-22685-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-22688-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawLaw and Criminology (R0)