Sampling Strategies: Applications

Part of the Springer Series on Environmental Management book series (SSEM)


Home Range Point Count Sampling Protocol Adaptive Sampling Resource Selection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Block, W.M. 1990. Geographic variation in foraging ecologies of breeding and nonbreeding birds in oak woodlands. Stud. Av. Biol. 13:264–269.Google Scholar
  2. Block, W.M., and L.A. Brennan. 1992. The habitat concept in ornithology: theory and applications. Curr. Ornithol. 11:35–91.Google Scholar
  3. Block, W.M., and M.L. Morrision. 1998. Habitat relationships of amphibians and reptiles in California oak woodlands. J. Herpetol. 32:51–60.Google Scholar
  4. Block, W.M., K.A. With, and M.L. Morrison. 1987. On measuring bird habitat: Influence of observer variability and sample size. Condor 89:241–251.Google Scholar
  5. Bissonette, J.A. 1997. Scale-sensitive ecological properties: Historical context, current meaning. Pp. 3–31 In J.A. Bissonette (ed.). Wildlife and Landscape Ecology: Effects of Pattern and Scale. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Bonham, C.D. 1989. Measurements of Terrestrial Vegetation. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Canfield, R. 1941. Application of the line intercept method in sampling range vegetation. J. For. 39:388–394.Google Scholar
  8. Cochran, W.G. 1977. Sampling Techniques, 3d ed. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Conover, W.J. 1980. Practical Nonparametric Statistics, 2d ed. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Dawson, D.K., D.R. Smith, and C.S. Robbins. 1995. Point count length and detection of forest Neotropical migrant birds. In C.J. Ralph, J.R. Sauer, and S. Drogge (tech. eds.). Monitoring Bird Populations by Point Counts, pp. 35–43. Gen. Tech. Rpt. PSW-GTR-149. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, CA.Google Scholar
  11. Fretwell, S.D., and H.L. Lucas. 1970. On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. I. Acta Biotheoret. 19:16–36.Google Scholar
  12. Ganey, J.L., W.M. Block, J.S. Jenness, and R.A. Wilson. 1999. Mexican spotted owl home range and habitat use in pine-oak forest: Implications for forest management. For. Sci. 45:127–135.Google Scholar
  13. Green, R.H. 1979. Sampling Design and Statistical Methods for Environmental Biologists. J Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Grubb, T.C., Jr., and M.S. Woodrey. 1990. Sex, age, intraspecific dominance, and use of food by birds wintering in temperate-deciduous and cold-coniferous woodlands: A review. Stud. Av. Biol. 13:270–279.Google Scholar
  15. Hanowski, J.M., and G.J. Niemi. 1990. Effects of unknown sex in analysis of foraging behavior. Stud. Av. Biol. 13:280–283.Google Scholar
  16. Hanski, I.A., and M.E. Gilpin (eds.). 1997. Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution. Academic Pr., San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  17. Heady, H.F., R.P. Gibbons, and R.W. Powell. 1959. A comparison of charting, line intercept, and line point methods of sampling shrub types of vegetation. J. Range Manage. 21:370–380.Google Scholar
  18. Heyer, W.R., M.A. Donnelly, R.W. McDiarmid, L.C. Hayek, and M.S. Foster (eds.). 1994. Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity: Standards and Methods for Amphibians. Smithsonian Institution Pr., Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  19. Hurlbert, S.H. 1984. Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol. Monogr. 54:187–211.Google Scholar
  20. Jeffers, J.N.R. 1980. Sampling. Statistical Checklist 2. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, National Environment Research Council, Cambridge, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  21. Kepler, C.B., and J.M. Scott. 1981. Reducing bird count variability by training observers. Stud. Av. Biol. 6:366–371.Google Scholar
  22. Klopfer, P.H. 1963. Behavioral aspects of habitat selection: the role of early experience. Wilson Bull. 75:15–22.Google Scholar
  23. Laake, J.L., S.T. Buckland, D.R. Anderson, and K.P. Burnham. 1993. DISTANCE User’s Guide. Colorado Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO.Google Scholar
  24. Little, R.J.A., and D.B. Rubin. 1987. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  25. Littel, R.C., G.A. Milliken, W.W. Stroup, and R.D. Wolfinger. 1996. SAS System for Mixed Models. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.Google Scholar
  26. Manly, B.L., L. McDonald, and D. Thomas. 1993. Resource Selection by Animals. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  27. MacArthur, R.H., and J.W. MacArthur. 1961. On bird species diversity. Ecology 42:594–598.Google Scholar
  28. Miles, D.B. 1990. The importance and consequences of temporal variation in avian foraging behavior. Stud. Av. Biol. 13:210–217.Google Scholar
  29. Moir, W.H., B. Geils, M.A. Benoit, and D. Scurlock. 1997. Ecology of southwestern ponderosa pine forests. In W.M. Block, and D.M. Finch (tech. eds.). Songbird Ecology in Southwestern Ponderosa Pine Forests: A Literature Review, pp. 3–27. Gen. Tech. Rpt. RM-GTR-292. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO.Google Scholar
  30. Morrison, M.L. 1982. The structure of western warbler assemblages: analysis of foraging behavior and habitat selection in Oregon. Auk 98:578–588.Google Scholar
  31. —. 1987. The design and importance of long-term ecological studies: analysis of vertebrates in the Inyo-White mountains, California. In R.C. Szaro, K.E. Severson, and D.R. Patton (tech. coords.). Management of Amphibians, Reptiles, and Small Mammals in North America, pp. 267–275. Gen. Tech. Rpt. RM-166. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO.Google Scholar
  32. Noon, B.R., and W.M. Block. 1990. Analytical considerations for study design. Stud. Av. Biol. 13:126–133.Google Scholar
  33. Otis, D.L., K.P. Burnham, G.C. White, and D.R. Anderson. 1978. Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations. Wildl. Monogr. 62.Google Scholar
  34. Petit, D.R., L.J. Petit, V.A. Saab, and T.E. Martin. 1995. Fixed-radius point counts in forests: Factors influencing effectiveness and efficiency. In C.J. Ralph, F.R. Sauer, and S. Drogge (tech. eds.). Monitoring Bird Populations by Point Counts, pp. 49–56. Gen. Tech. Rpt. PSW-GTR-149. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, CA.Google Scholar
  35. Ralph, C.J., and J.M. Scott (eds.). 1981. Estimating numbers of terrestrial birds. Stud. Av. Biol. 6.Google Scholar
  36. Ralph, C.J., J.R. Sauer, and S. Drogge (tech. eds.). 1995. Monitoring Bird Populations by Point Counts. Gen. Tech. Rpt. PSW-GTR-149. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, CA.Google Scholar
  37. Schneider, D.C. 1994. Quantitative Ecology. Academic Pr., San Diego.Google Scholar
  38. Strayer, D., J.S. Glitzenstein, C.G. Jones, J. Kolasa, G.E. Likens, M.J. McDonnell, G.G. Parker, and S.T.A. Pickett. 1986. Long-term ecological studies: An illustrated account of their design, operation, and importance to ecology. Inst. Ecol. Systemat. Occas. Pap. 2:1–38.Google Scholar
  39. Swihart, R.K., and N.A. Slade. 1985. Testing for independence of observations in animal movements. Ecology 66:1176–1184.Google Scholar
  40. Thompson, S.K. 1992. Sampling. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  41. Thompson, F.R., and M.J. Schwalbach. 1995. Analysis of sample size, counting time, and plot size from an avian point count survey on the Hoosier National Forest, Indiana. In C.J. Ralph, F.R. Sauer, and S. Drogge (tech. eds.). Monitoring Bird Populations by Point Counts, pp. 45–48. Gen. Tech. Rpt. PSW-GTR-149. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, CA.Google Scholar
  42. Thompson, W.L., G.C. White, and C. Gowan. 1998. Monitoring Vertebrate Populations. Academic Pr., San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  43. Verner, J. 1985. An assessment of counting techniques. Curr. Ornithol. 2:247–302.Google Scholar
  44. Verner, J. 1987. Preliminary results from a system of monitoring population trends in bird populations in oak-pine woodlands. In T.R. Plumb, and N.H. Pillsbury (tech. coords.). Multiple-Use Management of California’s Hardwood Resources, pp. 214–222. Gen. Tech. Rpt. PSW-100. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
  45. White, G.C., and K.P. Burnham. 1999. Program MARK: Survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46:120–138.Google Scholar
  46. White, G.C., D.R. Anderson, K.P. Burnham, and D.L. Otis. 1982. Capture-Recapture and Removal Methods for Sampling Closed Populations. Rpt. LA-8787-NERP. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM.Google Scholar
  47. Wiens, J.A. 1984. The place for long-term studies in ornithology. Auk 101:202–203.Google Scholar
  48. —. 1985. Habitat selection in variable environments: Shrub-steppe birds. In M.L. Cody (ed.). Habitat Selection in Birds, pp. 227–251. Academic Pr., Orlando, FL.Google Scholar
  49. —. 1989. Spatial scaling in ecology. Funct. Ecol. 3:385–397.Google Scholar
  50. Wiens, J.A., J.F. Addicott, T.J. Case, and J. Diamond. 1986. Overview: The importance of spatial and temporal scale in ecological investigations. In J. Diamond and T.J. Case (eds.). Community Ecology, pp. 145–153. Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
  51. Wingfield, J.C., and J.D. Jacobs. 1999. The interplay of innate and experimental factors regulating the life-history cycle of birds. Proc. Int. Ornithol. Congr. 22:2417–2443.Google Scholar
  52. Zippen, C. 1958. The removal method of population estimation. J. Wildl. Manage. 22:82–90.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 2001

Personalised recommendations